journal article·2020-09

Biomimetic potential of cerium oxide nanoparticles in modulating the metabolic gene signature in GBM-derived cell lines

Preethi Sridharan, G. Vinothkumar, Pooja Pratheesh, K. Suresh Babu

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 55· Issue 25
Publisher page

Abstract

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a lethal and the most common type of primary brain tumor. Extensive hypoxic regions in GBMs turn these tumors highly malignant and worsen the prognosis and clinical outcomes of the patients. Tumor cells residing in hypoxic regions exhibit high ROS levels and resistance to chemo- and radiation therapies. This facilitates the cancer stem cell niche to expand and contribute to cell proliferation and further tumor growth. Therapeutic approaches targeting hypoxia-induced factors, such as the anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody, bevacizumab have shown promising results in stabilizing the disease. Glioblastomas are predominantly glycolytic and hypoxia-induced factors are useful in the metabolic reprogramming of these tumors. Hence, developing therapeutic approaches that counter hypoxia may hold the key to improving the prognosis and clinical outcome of GBMs. In this work, we report that cerium oxide nanoparticles (CNPs) hold therapeutic potential for the treatment of GBM. CNPs of size 6 nm (CNP-6) and 12 nm (CNP-12) were used for this study. Our results show that CNP-6 exhibits short-term mitigation of ROS levels (up to 24 h) and are able to modulate the TMZ IC50 in tumor microenvironment-like conditions. CNP-12, on the other hand, mitigated ROS levels for up to 72 h, but the mitigation proved to be too lethal for the cells to survive given the important role played by basal-level ROS inside cells. Also, CNP-6 was better at altering metabolic gene expression profile compared to CNP-12 under tumor microenvironment-like conditions. These results indicate that CNPs of size < 10 nm may hold potential for development as nano-therapeutic modalities for tumor treatment. Cerium oxide nanoparticles modulate the metabolic gene expression in GBM derived cell lines
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Nanomaterials in Catalysis · Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics · Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (54)

Show source-provided references
1. Thakkar JP, Dolecek TA, Horbinski C et al (2014) Epidemiologic and molecular prognostic review of glioblastoma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 23:1985–1996. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-027510.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0275 ↗
2. Carlsson SK, Brothers SP, Wahlestedt C (2014) Emerging treatment strategies for glioblastoma multiforme. EMBO Mol Med 6:1359–1370. https://doi.org/10.15252/emmm.20130262710.15252/emmm.201302627 ↗
3. Zeng W, Liu P, Pan W et al (2015) Hypoxia and hypoxia inducible factors in tumor metabolism. Cancer Lett 356:263–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2014.01.03210.1016/j.canlet.2014.01.032 ↗
4. Ogunrinu TA, Sontheimer H (2010) Hypoxia increases the dependence of glioma cells on glutathione. J Biol Chem 285:37716–37724. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.16119010.1074/jbc.M110.161190 ↗
5. Kumari S, Badana AK, Malla R (2018) Reactive oxygen species: a key constituent in cancer survival. Biomark Insights 13:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/117727191875539110.1177/1177271918755391 ↗
6. Weinhouse S, Warburg O, Burk D, Al S (1956) On respiratory impairment in cancer cells. Science 124:267–272. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.124.3215.26710.1126/science.124.3215.267 ↗
7. Brat DJ, Mapstone TB (2003) Malignant glioma physiology: cellular response to hypoxia and its role in tumor progression. Ann Intern Med 138:659–668. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-138-8-200304150-0001410.7326/0003-4819-138-8-200304150-00014 ↗
8. Semenza GL (2003) Targeting HIF-1 for cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer 3:721–732. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc118710.1038/nrc1187 ↗
9. Sborov DW, Haverkos BM, Harris PJ (2015) Investigational cancer drugs targeting cell metabolism in clinical development. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 24:79–94. https://doi.org/10.1517/13543784.2015.96007710.1517/13543784.2015.960077 ↗
10. Ozdemir-Kaynak E, Qutub AA, Yesil-Celiktas O (2018) Advances in glioblastoma multiforme treatment: new models for nanoparticle therapy. Front Physiol 9:1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.0017010.3389/fphys.2018.00170 ↗
11. Cho J-H, Kim A-R, Kim S-H et al (2017) Development of a novel imaging agent using peptide-coated gold nanoparticles toward brain glioma stem cell marker CD133. Acta Biomater 47:182–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2016.10.00910.1016/j.actbio.2016.10.009 ↗
12. Zhang J, Chen N, Wang H et al (2016) Dual-targeting superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoprobes with high and low target density for brain glioma imaging. J Colloid Interface Sci 469:86–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2016.02.00410.1016/j.jcis.2016.02.004 ↗
13. Sack-Zschauer M, Bader S, Brenneisen P (2017) Cerium oxide nanoparticles as novel tool in glioma treatment: an in vitro study. J Nanomed Nanotechnol 08:1–9. https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7439.100047410.4172/2157-7439.1000474 ↗
14. Maeda H (2001) The enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect in tumor vasculature: the key role of tumor-selective macromolecular drug targeting. Adv Enzyme Regul 41:189–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2571(00)00013-310.1016/S0065-2571(00)00013-3 ↗
15. Hanafy N, Dini L, Citti C et al (2018) Inihibition of glycolysis by using a micro/nano-lipid bromopyruvic chitosan carrier as a promising tool to improve treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Nanomaterials 8:1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano801003410.3390/nano8010034 ↗
16. Fernandez-Fernandez A, Manchanda R, McGoron AJ (2011) Theranostic applications of nanomaterials in cancer: drug delivery, image-guided therapy, and multifunctional platforms. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 165:1628–1651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-011-9383-z10.1007/s12010-011-9383-z ↗
17. Barreto JA, O’Malley W, Kubeil M et al (2011) Nanomaterials: applications in cancer imaging and therapy. Adv Mater 23:H18–H40. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20110014010.1002/adma.201100140 ↗
18. Bertrand N, Wu J, Xu X et al (2014) Cancer nanotechnology: the impact of passive and active targeting in the era of modern cancer biology. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 66:2–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2013.11.00910.1016/j.addr.2013.11.009 ↗
19. Som A, Raliya R, Paranandi K et al (2019) Calcium carbonate nanoparticles stimulate tumor metabolic reprogramming and modulate tumor metastasis. Nanomedicine 14:169–182. https://doi.org/10.2217/nnm-2018-030210.2217/nnm-2018-0302 ↗
20. Miranda RR, Gorshkov V, Korzeniowska B et al (2018) Co-exposure to silver nanoparticles and cadmium induce metabolic adaptation in HepG2 cells. Nanotoxicology 12:781–795. https://doi.org/10.1080/17435390.2018.148998710.1080/17435390.2018.1489987 ↗
21. Lee MJ, Lee SJ, Yun SJ et al (2015) Silver nanoparticles affect glucose metabolism in hepatoma cells through production of reactive oxygen species. Int J Nanomed 11:55–68. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S9490710.2147/IJN.S94907 ↗
22. Sridharan P, Vinothkumar G, Pratheesh P, Babu KS (2018) Modulation of biomimetic properties of cerium oxide nanoparticles by hypoxic tumor microenvironments: steering towards tumor specificity. New J Chem 42:6370–6380. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8nj00097b10.1039/c8nj00097b ↗
23. Tsekhmistrenko OS, Tsekhmistrenko SI, Bityutskyy VS et al (2018) Biomimetic and antioxidant activity of nanocrystalline cerium dioxide. World Med Biol 14:196–201. https://doi.org/10.26724/2079-8334-2018-1-63-196-20110.26724/2079-8334-2018-1-63-196-201 ↗
24. Korsvik C, Patil S, Seal S, Self WT (2007) Superoxide dismutase mimetic properties exhibited by vacancy engineered ceria nanoparticles. Chem Commun 2007:1056–1058. https://doi.org/10.1039/b615134e10.1039/b615134e ↗
25. Bellio P, Luzi C, Mancini A et al (2018) Cerium oxide nanoparticles as potential antibiotic adjuvant. Effects of CeO2 nanoparticles on bacterial outer membrane permeability. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr 1860:2428–2435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2018.07.00210.1016/j.bbamem.2018.07.002 ↗
26. Renu G, Rani VVD, Nair SV et al (2012) Development of cerium oxide nanoparticles and its cytotoxicity in prostate cancer cells. Adv Sci Lett 6:17–25. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2012.331210.1166/asl.2012.3312 ↗
27. Alpaslan E, Yazici H, Golshan NH et al (2015) pH-Dependent activity of dextran-coated cerium oxide nanoparticles on prohibiting osteosarcoma cell proliferation. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 1:1096–1103. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.5b0019410.1021/acsbiomaterials.5b00194 ↗
28. Wason MS, Colon J, Das S et al (2013) Sensitization of pancreatic cancer cells to radiation by cerium oxide nanoparticle-induced ROS production. Nanomed Nanotechnol Biol Med 9:558–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nano.2012.10.01010.1016/j.nano.2012.10.010 ↗
29. Alili L, Sack M, Karakoti AS et al (2011) Combined cytotoxic and anti-invasive properties of redox-active nanoparticles in tumor-stroma interactions. Biomaterials 32:2918–2929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.12.05610.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.12.056 ↗
30. Alili L, Sack M, von Montfort C et al (2013) Downregulation of tumor growth and invasion by redox-active nanoparticles. Antioxid Redox Signal 19:765–778. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2012.483110.1089/ars.2012.4831 ↗
31. Lopez-Pascual A, Urrutia-Sarratea A, Lorente-Cebrián S et al (2019) Cerium oxide nanoparticles regulate insulin sensitivity and oxidative markers in 3T3-L1 adipocytes and C2C12 myotubes. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2019:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/269528910.1155/2019/2695289 ↗
32. Arya A, Sethy NK, Singh SK et al (2013) Cerium oxide nanoparticles protect rodent lungs from hypobaric hypoxia-induced oxidative stress and inflammation. Int J Nanomed 8:4507–4520. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S5303210.2147/IJN.S53032 ↗
33. Sridharan P, Anbazhagan A, Chandrasekaran A, Pratheesh P (2018) Absence of Beta-2 microgloblulin (B2M) and hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase-1(HPRT1) gene modulation in U87MG and U251 Glioblastoma cell lines subjected to cobalt chloride mediated hypoxia. Gene Reports 11:159–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genrep.2018.03.01210.1016/j.genrep.2018.03.012 ↗
34. Vinothkumar G, Amalraj R, Babu KS (2017) Fuel-oxidizer ratio tuned luminescence properties of combustion synthesized Europium doped cerium oxide nanoparticles and its effect on antioxidant properties. Ceram Int 43:5457–5466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.01.05310.1016/j.ceramint.2017.01.053 ↗
35. Vinothkumar G, Rengaraj S, Arunkumar P et al (2019) Ionic radii and concentration dependency of RE3+ (Eu3+, Nd3+, Pr3+, and La3+)-doped cerium oxide nanoparticles for enhanced multienzyme-mimetic and hydroxyl radical scavenging activity. J Phys Chem C 123:541–553. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b1010810.1021/acs.jpcc.8b10108 ↗
36. Taniguchi T, Watanabe T, Sugiyama N et al (2009) Identifying defects in ceria-based nanocrystals by UV resonance Raman spectroscopy. J Phys Chem C 113:19789–19793. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp904945710.1021/jp9049457 ↗
37. Anandkumar M, Vinothkumar G, Suresh Babu K (2017) Synergistic effect of gold supported on redox active cerium oxide nanoparticles for the catalytic hydrogenation of 4-nitrophenol. New J Chem 41:6720–6729. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7nj01300k10.1039/c7nj01300k ↗
38. Vinothkumar G, Arunkumar P, Mahesh A et al (2018) Size- and defect-controlled anti-oxidant enzyme mimetic and radical scavenging properties of cerium oxide nanoparticles. New J Chem 42:18810–18823. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8nj04435j10.1039/c8nj04435j ↗
39. Heckert EG, Karakoti AS, Seal S, Self WT (2008) The role of cerium redox state in the SOD mimetic activity of nanoceria. Biomaterials 29:2705–2709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.03.01410.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.03.014 ↗
40. Singh R, Singh S (2015) Role of phosphate on stability and catalase mimetic activity of cerium oxide nanoparticles. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces 132:78–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.05.00510.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.05.005 ↗
41. Singh R, Karakoti AS, Self W et al (2016) Redox-sensitive cerium oxide nanoparticles protect human keratinocytes from oxidative stress induced by glutathione depletion. Langmuir 32:12202–12211. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b0302210.1021/acs.langmuir.6b03022 ↗
42. Welsh SJ, Corrie PG (2015) Management of BRAF and MEK inhibitor toxicities in patients with metastatic melanoma. Ther Adv Med Oncol 7:122–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/175883401456642810.1177/1758834014566428 ↗
43. Kuger S, Cörek E, Polat B et al (2014) Novel PI3K and mTOR Inhibitor NVP-BEZ235 radiosensitizes breast cancer cell lines under normoxic and hypoxic conditions. Breast Cancer Basic Clin Res 8:39–49. https://doi.org/10.4137/BCBCR.S1369310.4137/BCBCR.S13693 ↗
44. Wick W, Weller M, Weiler M et al (2011) Pathway inhibition: emerging molecular targets for treating glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol 13:566–579. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nor03910.1093/neuonc/nor039 ↗
45. Strickland M, Stoll EA (2017) Metabolic reprogramming in glioma. Front Cell Dev Biol 5:1–32. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2017.0004310.3389/fcell.2017.00043 ↗
46. Keith B, Simon MC (2007) Hypoxia-Inducible Factors, Stem Cells, and Cancer. Cell 129:465–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.04.01910.1016/j.cell.2007.04.019 ↗
47. Mullarky E, Cantley LC (2015) Diverting glycolysis to combat oxidative stress. In: Nakao K, Minato N, Uemoto S (eds) Innovative medicine. Springer, Tokyo, pp 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55651-0_110.1007/978-4-431-55651-0_1 ↗
48. Ahmad F, Dixit D, Sharma V et al (2016) Nrf2-driven TERT regulates pentose phosphate pathway in glioblastoma. Cell Death Dis 7:e2213–e2213. https://doi.org/10.1038/cddis.2016.11710.1038/cddis.2016.117 ↗
49. Vassie JA, Whitelock JM, Lord MS (2017) Endocytosis of cerium oxide nanoparticles and modulation of reactive oxygen species in human ovarian and colon cancer cells. Acta Biomater 50:127–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2016.12.01010.1016/j.actbio.2016.12.010 ↗
50. Szymanski CJ, Munusamy P, Mihai C et al (2015) Shifts in oxidation states of cerium oxide nanoparticles detected inside intact hydrated cells and organelles. Biomaterials 62:147–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.05.04210.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.05.042 ↗
51. Walkey C, Das S, Seal S et al (2015) Catalytic properties and biomedical applications of cerium oxide nanoparticles. Environ Sci Nano 2:33–53. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4EN00138A10.1039/C4EN00138A ↗
52. Schieber M, Chandel NS (2014) ROS function in redox signaling and oxidative stress. Curr Biol 24:R453–R462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.03.03410.1016/j.cub.2014.03.034 ↗
53. Hwang CC, Huang TH, Tsai JS, Lin CS, Peng CH (2006) Combustion synthesis of nanocrystalline ceria (CeO2) powders by a dry route. Mat Sci Eng B 132:229–23810.1016/j.mseb.2006.01.021 ↗
54. Yang C, Jiang L, Zhang H et al (2014) Analysis of hypoxia-induced metabolic reprogramming. Methods Enzymol 542:425–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-416618-9.00022-410.1016/B978-0-12-416618-9.00022-4 ↗