Selective removal of CO from hydrocarbon-rich industrial off-gases over CeO2-supported metal oxides
Source abstract
Abstract
For the selective removal of CO in the off-gas streams from real-life chemical processes, the interfacial interaction between the support and the active metal oxides and the role of active oxygen species are two fascinating problems. Herein, a series of CeO2-supported metal oxide catalysts were synthesized by co-precipitation method and employed for the selective removal of CO from the off-gas stream of propane oxidation process. CuO/CeO2 catalyst exhibits full CO conversion and 100% selectivity for CO removal in off-gas stream within a rather wide temperature window of 140–190 °C, being relatively stable in 200-h long-term time-on-stream experiment. Raman spectra, H2-TPR, CO-TPD and XPS spectra studies revealed that the redox properties and the concentration of active oxygen species varied with supported metal oxide compositions, for which CuO/CeO2 catalyst exhibited the highest surface oxygen vacancy concentration, good low-temperature reduction behavior and the highest adsorption capacity of CO, thus resulting in advanced CO removal performance. This study presents a strategy to design a promising CeO2-supported catalyst for oxidation removal of CO from off-gas of alkane oxidation process.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. Heine C, Havecker M, Trunschke A et al (2015) The impact of steam on the electronic structure of the selective propane oxidation catalysts MoVTeNb oxide (orthorhombic M1 phase). Phys Chem Chem Phys 17:8983–899310.1039/C5CP00289C ↗
2. Stuyven B, Emmerich J, Eloy P et al (2014) Molybdenum-vanadium-antimony mixed oxide catalyst for isobutene partial oxidation synthesized using magneto hydrodynamic forces. Appl Catal A Gen 474:18–2510.1016/j.apcata.2013.07.039 ↗
3. Dummer NF, Bartley JK, Hutchings GJ (2011) Vanadium phosphate materials as selective oxidation catalysts. Adv Catal 54:189–24710.1016/B978-0-12-387772-7.00004-6 ↗
4. Alayoglu S, Nilekar AU, Mavrikakis M et al (2008) Ru–Pt core-shell nanoparticles for preferential oxidation of carbon monoxide in hydrogen. Nat Mater 7:333–33810.1038/nmat2156 ↗
5. Nilekar AU, Alayoglu S, Eichhorn B et al (2010) Preferential CO oxidation in hydrogen: reactivity of core-shell nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc 132:7418–742810.1021/ja101108w ↗
6. Tueysuez H, Comotti M, Schuth F (2008) Ordered mesoporous of Co3O4 as highly active catalyst for low temperature CO-oxidation. Chem Commun 34:4022–402410.1039/b808815b ↗
7. Selvamani AK, Shanthi D, Santhanara C et al (2018) Effective removal of automobile exhausts over flower-like Ce1−xCuxO2 nanocatalysts exposed active 100 plane. J Rare Earths 36:603–61210.1016/j.jre.2017.12.006 ↗
8. Okal J, Zawadzki M, Kraszkiewicz P et al (2018) Ru/CeO2 catalysts for combustion of mixture of light hydrocarbons: effect of preparation method and metal salt precursors. Appl Catal A Gen 549:161–16910.1016/j.apcata.2017.09.036 ↗
9. Bera P, Gayen A, Hegde MS et al (2003) Promoting effect of CeO2 in combustion synthesized Pt/CeO2 catalyst for CO oxidation. J Phys Chem B 107:6122–613010.1021/jp022132f ↗
10. Nagai Y, Hirabayashi T, Dohmae K et al (2006) Sintering inhibition mechanism of platinum supported on ceria-based oxide and Pt-oxide-support interaction. J Catal 242:103–10910.1016/j.jcat.2006.06.002 ↗
11. Oran U, Uner D (2004) Mechanisms of CO oxidation reaction and effect of chlorine ions on the CO oxidation reaction over Pt/CeO2 and Pt/CeO2/gamma-Al2O3 catalysts. Appl Catal B Environ 54:183–19110.1016/j.apcatb.2004.06.011 ↗
12. Oliviero L, Barbier J Jr., Labruquére S et al (1999) Role of the metal-support interface in the total oxidation of carboxylic acids over Ru/CeO2 catalysts. Catal Lett 60:15–1910.1023/A:1019026100843 ↗
13. Saqer SM, Kondarides DI, Verykios XE (2009) Catalytic activity of supported platinum and metal oxide catalysts for toluene oxidation. Top Catal 52:517–52710.1007/s11244-009-9182-8 ↗
14. Liu B, Li C, Zhang G et al (2018) Oxygen vacancy promoting dimethyl carbonate synthesis from CO2 and methanol over Zr-doped CeO2 nanorods. ACS Catal 8:10446–1045610.1021/acscatal.8b00415 ↗
15. Xu J, Lu G, Guo Y et al (2017) A highly effective catalyst of Co–CeO2 for the oxidation of diesel soot: the excellent NO oxidation activity and NOx storage capacity. Appl Catal A Gen 535:1–810.1016/j.apcata.2017.02.005 ↗
16. Antonio CJ, Alicia C, Arturo Javier V et al (2015) Effect of Ce and Zr addition to Ni/SiO2 catalysts for hydrogen production through ethanol steam reforming. Catalysts 7:58–76
17. Choi H, Kim J, Choung SJ et al (2017) Complete removal of carbon monoxide by functional nanoparticles for hydrogen fuel cell application. Chem Eng Sci 172:688–69310.1016/j.ces.2017.07.026 ↗
18. Wang RG, Mutinda SI, Fang MH (2013) One-pot hydrothermal synthesis and high temperature thermal stability of CexZr1−xO2 nanocrystals. RSC Adv 3:19508–1951410.1039/c3ra44150d ↗
19. Zhou X, Ling J, Sun W et al (2017) Fabrication of homogeneously Cu2+/La3+-doped CeO2 nanosheets and their application in CO oxidation. J Mater Chem 5:9717–972210.1039/C7TA00924K ↗
20. Jiang J, Li L (2007) Synthesis of sphere-like Co3O4 nanocrystals via a simple polyol route. Mater Lett 61:4894–489610.1016/j.matlet.2007.03.067 ↗
21. Xu X, Li L, Huang J et al (2018) Engineering Ni3+ cations in NiO lattice at the atomic level by Li+ doping: the roles of Ni3+ and oxygen species for CO oxidation. ACS Catal 8:8033–804510.1021/acscatal.8b01692 ↗
22. Piumetti M, Bensaid S, Fino D et al (2016) Nanostructured ceria-zirconia catalysts for CO oxidation: study on surface properties and reactivity. Appl Catal B Environ 197:35–4610.1016/j.apcatb.2016.02.023 ↗
23. Li W, Hu Y, Jiang H et al (2019) Facile synthesis of multi-shelled hollow Cu–CeO2 microspheres with promoted catalytic performance for preferential oxidation of CO. Mater Chem Phys 226:158–16810.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.12.097 ↗
24. Liyanage AD, Perera SD, Tan K et al (2014) Synthesis, characterization and photocatalytic activity of Y-doped CeO2 nanorods. ACS Catal 4:577–58410.1021/cs400889y ↗
25. Gao R, Zhang D, Maitarad P et al (2013) Morphology-dependent properties of MnOx/ZrO2 CeO2 nanostructures for the selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3. J Phys Chem C 117:10502–1051110.1021/jp400984z ↗
26. Yen H, Seo Y, Kaliaguine S et al (2012) Tailored mesostructured copper/ceria catalysts with enhanced performance for preferential oxidation of CO at low temperature. Angew Chem Int Ed 51:12032–1203510.1002/anie.201206505 ↗
27. Luo M, Ma J, Lu J et al (2007) High-surface area CuO–CeO2 catalysts prepared by a surfactant-templated method for low-temperature CO oxidation. J Catal 246:52–5910.1016/j.jcat.2006.11.021 ↗
28. Zhang X, Cheng X, Ma C et al (2018) Effects of the Fe/Ce ratio on the activity of CuO/CeO2–Fe2O3 catalysts for NO reduction by CO. Catal Sci Technol 8:3336–334510.1039/C8CY00709H ↗
29. Wang F, Dai H, Deng J et al (2012) Manganese oxides with rod-, wire-, tube-, and flower-like morphologies: highly effective catalytst for the removal of toluene. Environ Sci Technol 46:4034–404110.1021/es204038j ↗
30. Deng J, Zhang L, Dai H et al (2010) Ultrasound-assisted nanocasting fabrication of ordered mesoporous MnO2 and Co3O4 with high surface areas and polycrystalline walls. J Phys Chem C 114:2694–270010.1021/jp910159b ↗
31. Schryer DR, Upchurch BT, Sidney BD et al (1991) A proposed mechanism for Pt/SnOx-catalyzed CO oxidation. J Catal 130:314–31710.1016/0021-9517(91)90114-J ↗
32. Wang F, Büchel R, Savitsky A et al (2016) In situ EPR study of the redox properties of CuO–CeO2 catalysts for preferential CO oxidation (PROX). ACS Catal 6:3520–353010.1021/acscatal.6b00589 ↗
33. Martinez-Arias A, Hungria AB, Munuera G et al (2006) Preferential oxidation of CO in rich H2 over CuO/CeO2: details of selectivity and deactivation under the reactant steam. Appl Catal B Environ 65:207–21610.1016/j.apcatb.2006.02.003 ↗
34. Yao S, Mudiyanselage K, Xu W et al (2014) Unraveling the dynamic nature of a CuO/CeO2 catalyst for CO oxidation in operando: a combined study of XANES (Fluorescence) and DRIFTS. ACS Catal 4:1650–166110.1021/cs500148e ↗
35. Zhang X, Tian P, Tu W et al (2018) Tuning the dynamic interfacial structure of copper-ceria catalysts by indium oxide during CO oxidation. ACS Catal 8:5261–527510.1021/acscatal.7b04287 ↗
36. Kocemba I, Rynkowski J, Gurgul J et al (2016) Nature of the active sites in CO oxidation on FeSiBEA zeolites. Appl Catal A Gen 519:16–2610.1016/j.apcata.2016.03.025 ↗
37. He C, Yu Y, Yue L et al (2014) Low-temperature removal of toluene and propanal over highly active mesoporous CuCeOx catalysts synthesized via a simple self-precipitation protocol. Appl Catal B Environ 147:156–16610.1016/j.apcatb.2013.08.039 ↗
38. Bai B, Li J, Hao J (2015) 1D-MnO2, 2D-MnO2 and 3D-MnO2 for low-temperature oxidation of ethanol. Appl Catal B Environ 164:241–25010.1016/j.apcatb.2014.08.044 ↗
39. Jia A, Hu G, Meng L et al (2012) CO oxidation over CuO/Ce1−xCuxO2−δ catalysts: synergetic effects and kinetic study. J Catal 289:199–20910.1016/j.jcat.2012.02.010 ↗
40. Liu W, Sarofim AF, Flytzani-Stephanopoulos M (1994) Complete oxidation of carbon-monoxide and methane over metal-promoted fluorite oxide catalysts. Chem Eng Sci 49:4871–488810.1016/S0009-2509(05)80066-1 ↗
41. Neto RCR, Schmal M (2013) Synthesis of CeO2 and ZeZrO2 mixed oxide nanostructured catalysts for the iso-syntheses reaction. Appl Catal A Gen 450:131–14210.1016/j.apcata.2012.10.002 ↗
42. Fan J, Weng D, Wu X et al (2008) Modification of CeO2-ZrO2 mixed oxides by coprecipitated/impregnated Sr: effect on the microstructure and oxygen storage capacity. J Catal 258:177–18610.1016/j.jcat.2008.06.009 ↗
43. Zheng Y, Li K, Wang H et al (2016) Structure dependence and reaction mechanism of CO oxidation: a model study on microporous CeO2 and CeO2–ZrO2 catalysts. J Catal 344:365–37710.1016/j.jcat.2016.10.008 ↗