Investigation of factors affecting the physicochemical properties and degradation performance of nZVI@mesoSiO2 nanocomposites
Source abstract
Abstract
The nZVI@mesoSiO2 nanocomposites with ordered mesoporous structure were successfully prepared through a novel two-step method. Influences of the different conditions on the physicochemical properties and catalytic behavior were investigated. Degradation of 2,4,6-trichlorophenol (2,4,6-TCP) under different conditions was evaluated, and the possible activation mechanism was speculated. The results indicate that only the definite increase in the molar ratio of CTAB/NaOH (cetyltrimethylammonium bromide/sodium hydroxide) helps to obtain the higher specific surface area and narrower pore size distribution of the nZVI@mesoSiO2. The thickness of this silica coating could be easily regulated by changing the dosage of the TEOS (tetraethylorthosilicate) precursor. High dosage of the TEOS (larger than 5 mL) leads to the formation of core-free silica particles and low catalytic activity, while nZVI@mesoSiO2 cannot fully develop at a low dosage (2.5 mL). By controlling different extraction conditions, the nanoscale zero-valent iron core (nZVI) in the composite can be well preserved and corrosion resistant in the whole synthesis process. In this case, the as-prepared nanocomposites offer a high surface area of 638.78 m2 g−1 as well as a large accessible pore volume of 0.49 cm3 g−1 for the degradation, which contributing to a fast and efficient degradation of 2,4,6-TCP from aqueous solutions at an appropriate pH (pH 5.0). Moreover, the reusability investigation indicated that the nZVI cores will be inactivated and the pore will be blocked after repeated cyclic reactions. This comprehensive information provides not only a great understanding of the regulation mechanism of core–shell mesoporous nanocomposites, but also a further useful modification of the composites with high selectivity for 2,4,6-TCP.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Environmental remediation with nanomaterials · Nanomaterials for catalytic reactions · Radioactive element chemistry and processing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (65)
Show source-provided references
1. Lee HY, Lee CL, Jou CJG (2010) Comparison degradation of pentachlorophenol using microwave-induced nanoscale Fe0 and activated carbon. Water Air Soil Pollut 211:17–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-009-0276-510.1007/s11270-009-0276-5 ↗
2. Ghosh A, Dutta S, Mukherjee I et al (2017) Template-free synthesis of flower-shaped zero-valent iron nanoparticle: role of hydroxyl group in controlling morphology and nitrate reduction. Adv Powder Technol 28:2256–2264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2017.06.00610.1016/j.apt.2017.06.006 ↗
3. Zhuang Y, Ahn S, Luthy RG (2010) Debromination of polybrominated diphenyl ethers by nanoscale zerovalent iron: pathways, kinetics, and reactivity. Environ Sci Technol 44:8236–8242. https://doi.org/10.1021/es101601s10.1021/es101601s ↗
4. Nairat M, Shahwan T, Eroğlu AE, Fuchs H (2015) Incorporation of iron nanoparticles into clinoptilolite and its application for the removal of cationic and anionic dyes. J Ind Eng Chem 21:1143–1151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2014.05.02710.1016/j.jiec.2014.05.027 ↗
5. Raman CD, Kanmani S (2016) Textile dye degradation using nano zero valent iron: a review. J Environ Manag 177:341–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.04.03410.1016/j.jenvman.2016.04.034 ↗
6. Fang Z, Qiu X, Huang R et al (2011) Removal of chromium in electroplating wastewater by nanoscale zero-valent metal with synergistic effect of reduction and immobilization. Desalination 280:224–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.07.01110.1016/j.desal.2011.07.011 ↗
7. Volpe A, Pagano M, Mascolo G et al (2013) Simultaneous Cr(VI) reduction and non-ionic surfactant oxidation by peroxymonosulphate and iron powder. Chemosphere 91:1250–1256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.02.01210.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.02.012 ↗
8. Azzam AM, El-Wakeel ST, Mostafa BB, El-Shahat MF (2016) Removal of Pb, Cd, Cu and Ni from aqueous solution using nano scale zero valent iron particles. J Environ Chem Eng 4:2196–2206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2016.03.04810.1016/j.jece.2016.03.048 ↗
9. Guan X, Sun Y, Qin H et al (2015) The limitations of applying zero-valent iron technology in contaminants sequestration and the corresponding countermeasures: the development in zero-valent iron technology in the last two decades (1994–2014). Water Res 75:224–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.02.03410.1016/j.watres.2015.02.034 ↗
10. Noubactep C (2008) A critical review on the process of contaminant removal in Fe0–H2O systems. Environ Technol 29:909–920. https://doi.org/10.1080/0959333080213160210.1080/09593330802131602 ↗
11. Tang S, Wang XM, Mao YQ et al (2015) Effect of dissolved oxygen concentration on iron efficiency: removal of three chloroacetic acids. Water Res 73:342–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.01.02710.1016/j.watres.2015.01.027 ↗
12. Gong J, Lee CS, Kim EJ et al (2016) Enhancing the reactivity of bimetallic Bi/Fe0 by citric acid for remediation of polluted water. J Hazard Mater 310:135–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.02.02710.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.02.027 ↗
13. Gao Y, Wang F, Wu Y et al (2016) Comparison of degradation mechanisms of microcystin-LR using nanoscale zero-valent iron (nZVI) and bimetallic Fe/Ni and Fe/Pd nanoparticles. Chem Eng J 285:459–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.09.07810.1016/j.cej.2015.09.078 ↗
14. Zhuang Y, Jin L, Luthy RG (2012) Kinetics and pathways for the debromination of polybrominated diphenyl ethers by bimetallic and nanoscale zerovalent iron: effects of particle properties and catalyst. Chemosphere 89:426–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.05.07810.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.05.078 ↗
15. Zhu F, Li L, Ma S, Shang Z (2016) Effect factors, kinetics and thermodynamics of remediation in the chromium contaminated soils by nanoscale zero valent Fe/Cu bimetallic particles. Chem Eng J 302:663–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.05.07210.1016/j.cej.2016.05.072 ↗
16. Yang Y, Cheng P, Huang S (2016) Unraveling the roles of iron in stabilizing the defective graphene-supported [Formula presented] bimetallic nanoparticles. J Alloys Compd 688:1172–1180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.07.15710.1016/j.jallcom.2016.07.157 ↗
17. Liu J, Liu A, Zhang W (2016) The influence of polyelectrolyte modification on nanoscale zero-valent iron (nZVI): aggregation, sedimentation, and reactivity with Ni(II) in water. Chem Eng J 303:268–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.05.13210.1016/j.cej.2016.05.132 ↗
18. Phenrat T, Kumloet I (2016) Electromagnetic induction of nanoscale zerovalent iron particles accelerates the degradation of chlorinated dense non-aqueous phase liquid: proof of concept. Water Res 107:19–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.10.03510.1016/j.watres.2016.10.035 ↗
19. Zhang D, Wei S, Kaila C et al (2010) Carbon-stabilized iron nanoparticles for environmental remediation. Nanoscale 2:917. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0nr00065e10.1039/c0nr00065e ↗
20. Shi L, Zhang X, Chen Z (2011) Removal of Chromium (VI) from wastewater using bentonite-supported nanoscale zero-valent iron. Water Res 45:886–892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.09.02510.1016/j.watres.2010.09.025 ↗
21. Li A, Tai C, Zhao Z et al (2007) Debromination of decabrominated diphenyl ether by resin-bound iron nanoparticles. Environ Sci Technol 41:6841–6846. https://doi.org/10.1021/es070769c10.1021/es070769c ↗
22. Mackenzie K, Bleyl S, Georgi A, Kopinke FD (2012) Carbo-Iron—an Fe/AC composite—as alternative to nano-iron for groundwater treatment. Water Res 46:3817–3826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.04.01310.1016/j.watres.2012.04.013 ↗
23. Kresge CT, Leonowicz ME, Roth WJ et al (1992) Ordered mesoporous molecular sieves synthesized by a liquid-crystal template mechanism. Nature 359:710–712. https://doi.org/10.1038/359710a010.1038/359710a0 ↗
24. Di Renzo F, Cambon H, Dutartre R (1997) A 28-year-old synthesis of micelle-templated mesoporous silica. Microporous Mater 10:283–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-6513(97)00028-X10.1016/S0927-6513(97)00028-X ↗
25. Wang H, Liu Y, Yao S, Zhu P (2018) Selective recognization of dicyandiamide in bovine milk by mesoporous silica SBA-15 supported dicyandiamide imprinted polymer based on surface molecularly imprinting technique. Food Chem 240:1262–1267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.08.06610.1016/j.foodchem.2017.08.066 ↗
26. Dou J, Sheng Y, Choong C et al (2017) Silica nanowires encapsulated Ru nanoparticles as stable nanocatalysts for selective hydrogenation of CO2 to CO. Appl Catal B Environ 219:580–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.07.08310.1016/j.apcatb.2017.07.083 ↗
27. Gupta R, Ganesan V (2015) Gold nanoparticles impregnated mesoporous silica spheres for simultaneous and selective determination of uric acid and ascorbic acid. Sens Actuators B Chem 219:139–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2015.05.01810.1016/j.snb.2015.05.018 ↗
28. Zhang J, Sun W, Bergman L et al (2012) Magnetic mesoporous silica nanospheres as DNA/drug carrier. Mater Lett 67:379–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2011.09.08610.1016/j.matlet.2011.09.086 ↗
29. Liu J, Bu W, Pan L, Shi J (2013) NIR-triggered anticancer drug delivery by upconverting nanoparticles with integrated azobenzene-modified mesoporous silica. Angew Chemie Int Ed 52:4375–4379. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20130018310.1002/anie.201300183 ↗
30. Wang W, Wen Y, Xu L et al (2014) A selective release system based on dual-drug-loaded mesoporous silica for nanoparticle-assisted combination therapy. Chem A Eur J 20:7796–7802. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.20140233410.1002/chem.201402334 ↗
31. Wang W, Chen L, Xu LP et al (2015) A free-blockage controlled release system based on the hydrophobic/hydrophilic conversion of mesoporous silica nanopores. Chem A Eur J 21:2680–2685. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.20140522210.1002/chem.201405222 ↗
32. Saikia K, Bhattacharya K, Sen D et al (2019) Solvent evaporation driven entrapment of magnetic nanoparticles in mesoporous frame for designing a highly efficient MRI contrast probe. Appl Surf Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.09.11710.1016/j.apsusc.2018.09.117 ↗
33. Meng C, Zhikun W, Qiang L et al (2018) Preparation of amino-functionalized Fe3O4@mSiO2 core–shell magnetic nanoparticles and their application for aqueous Fe3+ removal. J Hazard Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.07.06210.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.07.062 ↗
34. Raman NK, Anderson MT, Brinker CJ (1996) Template-based approaches to the preparation of amorphous, nanoporous silicas. Chem Mater 8:1682–1701. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm960138+10.1021/cm960138+ ↗
35. Beck JS, Vartuli JC, Roth WJ et al (1992) A new family of mesoporous molecular sieves prepared with liquid crystal templates. J Am Chem Soc 114:10834–10843. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00053a02010.1021/ja00053a020 ↗
36. Zhao W, Gu J, Zhang L et al (2005) Fabrication of uniform magnetic nanocomposite spheres with a magnetic core/mesoporous silica shell structure. J Am Chem Soc 127:8916–8917. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja051113r10.1021/ja051113r ↗
37. Huang YH, Zhang TC (2005) Effects of dissolved oxygen on formation of corrosion products and concomitant oxygen and nitrate reduction in zero-valent iron systems with or without aqueous Fe2+. Water Res 39:1751–1760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2005.03.00210.1016/j.watres.2005.03.002 ↗
38. Kim S-S, Pauly TR, Pinnavaia TJ (2000) Non-ionic surfactant assembly of ordered, very large pore molecular sieve silicas from water soluble silicates. Chem Commun 123:1661–1662. https://doi.org/10.1039/b002856h10.1039/b002856h ↗
39. Liu Y, Karkamkar A, Pinnavaia TJ (2001) Redirecting the assembly of hexagonal MCM-41 into cubic MCM-48 from sodium silicate without the use of an organic structure modifier. Chem Commun 18:1822–1823. https://doi.org/10.1039/b103954g10.1039/b103954g ↗
40. Pang X, Tang F (2005) Morphological control of mesoporous materials using inexpensive silica sources. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 85:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2005.06.01210.1016/j.micromeso.2005.06.012 ↗
41. Yang H, Coombs N, Ozin G (1997) Morphogenesis of shapes and surface patterns in mesoporous silica. Nature 386:692–69510.1038/386692a0 ↗
42. Tang X, Feng Q, Liu K et al (2018) Fabrication of magnetic Fe3O4/silica nanofiber composites with enhanced Fenton-like catalytic performance for Rhodamine B degradation. J Mater Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1490-y10.1007/s10853-017-1490-y ↗
43. Martínez ML, Falcón H, Beltramone AR, Anunziata OA (2016) Synthesis and characterization of 2D-hexagonal, 3D-hexagonal and cubic mesoporous materials using CTAB and silica gel. Mater Des 104:251–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.05.03810.1016/j.matdes.2016.05.038 ↗
44. Vojoudi H, Badiei A, Bahar S et al (2017) A new nano-sorbent for fast and efficient removal of heavy metals from aqueous solutions based on modification of magnetic mesoporous silica nanospheres. J Magn Magn Mater 441:193–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2017.05.06510.1016/j.jmmm.2017.05.065 ↗
45. Deng Y, Qi D, Deng C et al (2008) Superparamagnetic high-magnetization microspheres with an Fe3O4@SiO2 core and perpendicularly aligned mesoporous SiO2 shell for removal of microcystins. J Am Chem Soc 130:28–29. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja077758410.1021/ja0777584 ↗
46. Deng Y, Cai Y, Sun Z et al (2010) Multifunctional mesoporous composite microspheres with well-designed nanostructure: a highly integrated catalyst system. J Am Chem Soc 132:8466–8473. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja102574410.1021/ja1025744 ↗
47. Zhou YY, Li X, Chen Z (2012) Rapid synthesis of well-ordered mesoporous silica from sodium silicate. Powder Technol 226:239–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2012.04.05410.1016/j.powtec.2012.04.054 ↗
48. Chen Y, Li Z, Qin J, Chen A (2016) Monodispersed mesoporous silica (mSiO2) spheres as abrasives for improved chemical mechanical planarization performance. J Mater Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-016-9882-y10.1201/b21118 ↗
49. Hommaid O, Hamdo JY (2014) Adsorption of chromium(VI) from an aqueous solution on a Syrian surfactant-modified zeolite. Int J ChemTech Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2008.07.02510.1016/j.colsurfa.2008.07.025 ↗
50. Wang D, Duan X, Zhang J et al (2009) Fabrication of superparamagnetic hydroxyapatite with highly ordered three-dimensional pores. J Mater Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-009-3555-z10.1007/s10853-009-3555-z ↗
51. Yue Q, Li J, Luo W et al (2015) An interface coassembly in biliquid phase: toward core–shell magnetic mesoporous silica microspheres with tunable pore size. J Am Chem Soc 137:13282–13289. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5b0561910.1021/jacs.5b05619 ↗
52. Ding HL, Zhang YX, Wang S et al (2012) Fe3O4@SiO2 core/shell nanoparticles: the silica coating regulations with a single core for different core sizes and shell thicknesses. Chem Mater 24:4572–4580. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm302828d10.1021/cm302828d ↗
53. Lee DC, Mikulec FV, Pelaez JM et al (2006) Synthesis and magnetic properties of silica-coated FePt nanocrystals. J Phys Chem B 110:11160–11166. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp060974z10.1021/jp060974z ↗
54. Zhang M, Cushing BL, O’Connor CJ (2008) Synthesis and characterization of monodisperse ultra-thin silica-coated magnetic nanoparticles. Nanotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/19/8/08560110.1088/0957-4484/19/8/085601 ↗
55. Yi DK, Lee SS, Papaefthymiou GC, Ying JY (2006) Nanoparticle architectures templated by SiO2/Fe2O3 nanocomposites. Chem Mater 18:614–619. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm051297910.1021/cm0512979 ↗
56. LaMer V, Dinegar R (1950) Theory, production and mechanism of formation of monodispersed hydrosols. J Am Chem 72:4847–4854. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01167a00110.1021/ja01167a001 ↗
57. Huang Y, Pemberton JE (2010) Synthesis of uniform, spherical sub-100 nm silica particles using a conceptual modification of the classic La Mer model. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 360:175–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2010.02.03110.1016/j.colsurfa.2010.02.031 ↗
58. Li W, Yang J, Wu Z et al (2012) A versatile kinetics-controlled coating method to construct uniform porous TiO2 shells for multifunctional core–shell structures. J Am Chem Soc 134:11864–11867. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja303714610.1021/ja3037146 ↗
59. Liu F, Tian H, He J (2014) Adsorptive performance and catalytic activity of superparamagnetic Fe3O4@nSiO2@mSiO2 core–shell microspheres towards DDT. J Colloids Interface Sci 419:68–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2013.12.04610.1016/j.jcis.2013.12.046 ↗
60. Xun S, Jiang W, Guo T et al (2019) Magnetic mesoporous nanospheres supported phosphomolybdate-based ionic liquid for aerobic oxidative desulfurization of fuel. J Colloids Interface Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2018.08.11510.1016/j.jcis.2018.08.115 ↗
61. Zhang J, Zhai S, Li S et al (2013) Pb(II) removal of Fe3O4@SiO2–NH2 core–shell nanomaterials prepared via a controllable sol–gel process. Chem Eng J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.11.04310.1016/j.cej.2012.11.043 ↗
62. Li M, Li X, Qi X et al (2015) Shape-controlled synthesis of magnetic iron Oxide@SiO2–Au@C particles with core–shell nanostructures. Langmuir 31:5190–5197. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b0080010.1021/acs.langmuir.5b00800 ↗
63. Li W, Zhao D (2013) Extension of the Stöber method to construct mesoporous SiO2 and TiO2 shells for uniform multifunctional core-shell structures. Adv Mater 25:142–14910.1002/adma.201203547 ↗
64. Lv Y, Niu Z, Chen Y, Hu Y (2016) Synthesis of SiO2 coated zero-valent iron/palladium bimetallic nanoparticles and their application in a nano-biological combined system for 2,2′,4,4′-tetrabromodiphenyl ether degradation. RSC Adv 6:20357–20365. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ra22388a10.1039/C5RA22388A ↗
65. Zaghouane-Boudiaf H, Boutahala M (2011) Adsorption of 2,4,5-trichlorophenol by organo-montmorillonites from aqueous solutions: kinetics and equilibrium studies. Chem Eng J 170:120–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2011.03.03910.1016/j.cej.2011.03.039 ↗