Effect of the grain boundary character distribution on the self-organization of adiabatic shear bands in 1Cr18Ni9Ti austenitic stainless steel
Source abstract
Abstract
The self-organization of adiabatic shear bands (ASBs) in the steel with a different grain boundary character distribution (GBCD) was investigated using the radial collapse of thick-walled cylinders. GBCD of 1Cr18Ni9Ti austenitic stainless steel was optimized by thermo-mechanical treatment. The results showed that the proportion of special grain boundaries, especially the Σ3 grain boundaries, were increased from 27.8, 18.9 to 72.5, 55.8%, respectively. And the high-angle grain boundaries were replaced or interrupted by the low-angle grain boundaries and special grain boundary clusters. The results of optical microscopic examination showed that the shear bands mainly propagated along the clockwise direction, and the multiple shear bands influenced each other along with bifurcation and merging. Also, the number and spacing of the shear bands of the solution treatment specimen (ST specimen) and thermo-mechanical treatment specimen (TMT specimen) were the same, which meant that GBCD optimization had no obvious effect on the nucleation of shear bands. However, the lengths of ASBs in TMT specimen were much shorter than those of the ST specimen under the same deformation conditions. The slower propagation rate of ASBs in TMT specimen suggested that by introducing a large number of special grain boundaries, the GBCD optimization hindered the propagation of ASBs and improved the damage resistance under high-strain-rate loading. Also, voids were nucleated preferentially in the ASBs and coalesced along ASBs, and cracks formed finally.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Material Properties and Failure Mechanisms
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. Robinson JH, Nolen AM (1995) An investigation of metal matrix composites as shields for hypervelocity orbital debris impacts. Int J Impact Eng 17(4):685–696. https://doi.org/10.1016/0734-743X(95)99891-T10.1016/0734-743X(95)99891-T ↗
2. Meyers MA (1994) Dynamic behavior of materials. Wiley, London10.1002/9780470172278 ↗
3. Yang Y, Wang BF (2006) Dynamic recrystallization in adiabatic shear band in α-titanium. Mater Lett 60(17):2198–2202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2005.12.09710.1016/j.matlet.2005.12.097 ↗
4. Jiang LH, Yang Y, Wang Z, Hu HB (2018) Microstructure evolution within adiabatic shear band in peak aged ZK60 magnesium alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 711:317–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.02.15810.1016/j.jallcom.2017.02.158 ↗
5. Yang Y, Jiang F, Zhou BM et al (2011) Microstructural characterization and evolution mechanism of adiabatic shear band in a near beta-Ti alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 528(6):2787–2794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2010.12.05310.1016/j.msea.2010.12.053 ↗
6. Xu YB, Zhong WL, Chen YJ, Shen LT, Liu Q, Bai YL, Meyers MA (2001) Shear localization and recrystallization in dynamic deformation of 8090 Al Li alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 299A:287–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(00)01412-X10.1016/S0921-5093(00)01412-X ↗
7. Meyers MA, Xu YB, Xue Q, Perez-Prado MT, McNelley TR (2003) Microstructural evolution in adiabatic shear localization in stainless steel. Acta Mater 51(5):1307–1325. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00526-810.1016/S1359-6454(02)00526-8 ↗
8. Peirs J, Tirry W, Amin-Ahmadi B, Coghe F, Verleysen P, Rabet L, Schryvers D, Degrieck J (2013) Microstructure of adiabatic shear bands in Ti6Al4V. Mater Charact 75:79–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2012.10.00910.1016/j.matchar.2012.10.009 ↗
9. Nesterenko VF, Bondar MP (1994) Localization of deformation in collapse of a thick walled cylinder. Combust Explos Shock 30(4):500–50910.1007/BF00790157 ↗
10. Grady DE (1980) Shock deformation of brittle solid. J Geophys Res 85(B2):913–924. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB085iB02p0091310.1029/JB085iB02p00913 ↗
11. Grady DE, Kipp ME (1987) The growth of unstable thermoplastic shear with application to steady-wave shock compression in solids. J Mech Phys Solids 35:95–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(87)90030-510.1016/0022-5096(87)90030-5 ↗
12. Wright TW, Ockendon H (1996) A scaling law for the effect of inertia on the formation of adiabatic shear bands. Int J Plast 12(7):927–934. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-6419(96)00034-410.1016/S0749-6419(96)00034-4 ↗
13. Molinari A (1997) Collective behavior and spacing of adiabatic shear bands. J Mech Phys Solids 45(9):1551–1575. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5096(97)00012-410.1016/S0022-5096(97)00012-4 ↗
14. Meyers MA, Nesterenko VF, LaSalvia JC, Xue Q (2001) Shear localization in dynamic deformation of materials: microstructural evolution and self-organization. Mater Sci Eng A 317(1):204–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01160-110.1016/S0921-5093(01)01160-1 ↗
15. Meyers MA, Wang SL (1998) An improved method for shock consolidation of powders. Acta Metall Mater 36:925–93610.1016/0001-6160(88)90147-2 ↗
16. Xue Q, Nesterenko VF, Meyers MA (2003) Evaluation of the collapsing thick-walled cylinder technique for shear-band spacing. Int J Impact Eng 28(3):257–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0734-743x(02)00103-310.1016/s0734-743x(02)00103-3 ↗
17. Xue Q, Meyers MA, Nesterenko VF (2004) Self organization of shear bands in stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng A 384:35–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2004.05.06910.1016/j.msea.2004.05.069 ↗
18. Xue Q, Gray T III (2006) Development of adiabatic shear bands in annealed 316L stainless steel: part I. Correlation between evolving microstructure and mechanical behavior. Metall Mater Trans A 37A:2435–2446. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0258621710.1007/BF02586217 ↗
19. Liu MT, Li YC, Hu HB, Hu XZ (2014) A numerical model for adiabatic shear bands with application to a thick-walled cylinder in 304 stainless steel. Model Simul Mater Sci 22(1):015005. https://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/22/1/01500510.1088/0965-0393/22/1/015005 ↗
20. Liu MT, Guo ZL, Fan C et al (2016) Modeling spontaneous shear bands evolution in thick-walled cylinders subjected to external high-strain-rate loading. Int J Solid Struct 97–98:336–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.07.01410.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.07.014 ↗
21. Yang Y, Jiang LH, Xu Z, Wang Z (2017) An examination of adiabatic shearing behavior in ZK60 alloy with different states of heat treatment. Mater Sci Eng A 685:57–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2016.12.11710.1016/j.msea.2016.12.117 ↗
22. Yang Y, Jiang LH (2016) Effect of heat treatment on adiabatic shear susceptibility in ZK60 magnesium alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 664:146–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2016.04.00210.1016/j.msea.2016.04.002 ↗
23. Yang Y, Jiang LH (2016) Self-organization of adiabatic shear bands in ZK60 magnesium alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 655:321–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2016.01.00810.1016/j.msea.2016.01.008 ↗
24. Yang Y, Li XM, Chen SW, Zhang QM, Jiang F, Zheng HG (2010) Effects of pre-notches on the self-organization behaviors of shear bands in aluminum alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 527(20):5084–5091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2010.04.07910.1016/j.msea.2010.04.079 ↗
25. Yang Y, Tan GY, Chen PX et al (2012) Effects of different aging statuses and strain rate on the adiabatic shear susceptibility of 2195 aluminum–lithium alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 546(1):279–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2012.03.06710.1016/j.msea.2012.03.067 ↗
26. Yang Y, Zheng HG, Zhao ZD et al (2011) Effect of phase composition on self-organization of shear bands in Ti-1300 titanium alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 528(25):7506–7513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2011.06.06810.1016/j.msea.2011.06.068 ↗
27. Yang Y, Zheng HG, Shi ZJ et al (2011) Effect of orientation on self-organization of shear bands in 7075 aluminum alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 528(6):2446–2453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2010.12.05010.1016/j.msea.2010.12.050 ↗
28. Watanabe H, Mukai T, Koichi I (2001) Realization of high strain rate superplasticity at low temperatures in a Mg–Zn–Zr alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 307(1–2):119–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(00)01974-210.1016/S0921-5093(00)01974-2 ↗
29. Shimada M, Kokawa H, Wang ZJ et al (2002) Optimization of grain boundary character distribution for intergranular corrosion resistant 304 stainless steel by twin-induced grain boundary engineering. Acta Mater 50(9):2331–2341. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00064-210.1016/S1359-6454(02)00064-2 ↗
30. El Wahabit M, Gavard L, Cabrera JM et al (2005) EBSD study of purity effects during hot working in austenitic stainless steels. Mater Sci Eng A 393(1):83–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2004.09.06410.1016/j.msea.2004.09.064 ↗
31. Yang Y, Jiang LH, Luo SH et al (2016) Effect of grain boundary character distribution on the adiabatic shear susceptibility. Metall Mater Trans A 47A(9):5589–5597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-016-3721-210.1007/s11661-016-3721-2 ↗
32. Lee SL, Richards NL (2005) The effect of single-step low strain and annealing of nickel on grain boundary character. Mater Sci Eng A 390(1):81–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2004.08.04410.1016/j.msea.2004.08.044 ↗
33. Warnglen Gotsa (1985) An introduction to corrosion and protection of metals. Chapman and Hall, London10.1007/978-94-009-4850-1 ↗
34. Brandon DG (1966) The structure of high-angle grain boundaries. Acta Metall 14(11):1479–148410.1016/0001-6160(66)90168-4 ↗
35. Kennedy JE (1972) In: 12th Annual symposium behavior and utilization of explosives in engineering design. ASME, Albuquerque, NM
36. Pedro FN, Po-Hsun C, Andrew H, Matthew S, David JB, Vitali FN (2018) Shear band patterning and post-critical behavior in AISI 4340 steel with different microstructure. Int J Impact Eng 112:144–15410.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.10.011 ↗
37. Pedro FN, Po-Hsun C, Andrew H, Matthew S, David JB, Vitali FN (2018) Shear localization in 4340 steel with different microstructure using thick wall cylinder method. AIP Conf Proc 1979:070022. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.504483110.1063/1.5044831 ↗
38. Xue Q (2001) Spatial evolution of adiabatic shear localization in stainless steel, titanium and titanium-aluminum-vanadium alloy. University of California, San Diego
39. Lovinger Z, Rikanati A, Rosenberg Z et al (2011) Electro-magnetic collapse of thick-walled cylinders to investigate spontaneous shear localization. Int J Impact Eng 38:918–929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.06.00610.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.06.006 ↗
40. Xu X (2013) Effect of grain boundary design and control on the mechanical behavior of SUS304. Nanjing University of Science & Technology, Nanjing
41. Guduru PR, Rosakis AJ, Ravichandran G (2001) Dynamic shear bands: an investigation using high speed optical and infrared diagnostic. Mech Mater 33(7):371–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6636(01)00051-510.1016/S0167-6636(01)00051-5 ↗
42. Yang Y, Wang BF, Xiong J et al (2006) Adiabatic shear band on Ti side in the titanium/mild st. explosive cladding interface: experiments, simulation, microstructure evolution. Metall Mater Trans A 37(10):3131–3137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-006-0193-910.1007/s11661-006-0193-9 ↗
43. Odeshi AG, Al-ameeri S, Mirfakhraei S et al (2006) Deformation and failure mechanism in AISI 4340 steel under ballistic impact. Theor Appl Fract Mech 45:18–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2005.11.00510.1016/j.tafmec.2005.11.005 ↗