journal article·2018-06

Effect of grain boundary angle on {332}<113> twinning transfer behavior in β-type Ti–15Mo–5Zr alloy

Xueyin Zhou, Xiaohua Min

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 53· Issue 11
Publisher page

Abstract

The {332}<113> twin–twin and twin–dislocation pairs at various grain boundaries were systematically examined by using electron backscattered diffraction technique in a slightly deformed β-type Ti–15Mo–5Zr alloy. The effect of grain boundary angle on twinning transfer behavior in neighboring grain was quantitatively analyzed in terms of strain accommodation combined macroscopic Schmid law. The twinning transfer occurred readily at the low angle grain boundaries without significant local stress concentration and formed a twin–twin pair dominated by applied stress, i.e., macroscopic Schmid law. At the high angle grain boundaries, it often resulted in a twin–twin pair with non-Schmid factor twinning variant or a twin–dislocation pair with geometrically necessary dislocations at the boundary area dominated by the strain accommodation. The activation of non-Schmid factor twinning variant and slip system in neighboring grain was due to their high accommodative capacity while releasing the local internal stress concentration, which was caused by the twinning transfer at high angle grain boundaries.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties · Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. Marteleur M, Sun F, Gloriant T, Vermaut P, Jacques PJ, Prima F (2012) On the design of new β-metastable titanium alloys with improved work hardening rate thanks to simultaneous TRIP and TWIP effects. Scr Mater 66:749–75210.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.01.049 ↗
2. Sun F, Zhang JY, Marteleur M, Gloriant T, Vermaut P, LailléD Castany P, Curfs C, Jacques PJ, Prima F (2013) Investigation of early stage deformation mechanisms in a metastable β titanium alloy showing combined twinning-induced plasticity and transformation-induced plasticity effects. Acta Mater 61:6406–641710.1016/j.actamat.2013.07.019 ↗
3. Min XH, Emura S, Nishimura T, Tsuchiya K, Tsuzaki K (2010) Microstructure, tensile deformation mode and crevice corrosion resistance in Ti–10Mo–xFe alloys. Mater Sci Eng A 527:5499–550610.1016/j.msea.2010.06.016 ↗
4. Wang CH, Yang CD, Liu M, Li X, Hu PF, Russell AM, Cao GH (2016) Martensitic microstructures and mechanical properties of as-quenched metastable β-type Ti–Mo alloys. J Mater Sci 51:6886–6896. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-016-9976-610.1007/s10853-016-9976-6 ↗
5. Ahmed M, Wexler D, Casillas G, Ivasishin OM, Pereloma EV (2015) The influence of β phase stability on deformation mode and compressive mechanical properties of Ti–10V–3Fe–3Al alloy. Acta Mater 84:124–13510.1016/j.actamat.2014.10.043 ↗
6. Ma XK, Li FG, Zhao C, Zhu G, Li W, Sun ZK, Yuan ZW (2017) Indenter load effects on creep deformation behavior for Ti–10V–2Fe–3Al alloy at room temperature. J Aollys Compd 709:322–32810.1016/j.jallcom.2017.03.175 ↗
7. Banerjee D, Williams JC (2013) Perspectives on titanium science and technology. Acta Mater 61:844–87910.1016/j.actamat.2012.10.043 ↗
8. Zhang LC, Zhou T, Aindow M, Alpay SP, Blackburn MJ, Wu MH (2005) Nucleation of stress-induced martensites in a Ti/Mo-based alloy. J Mater Sci 40:2833–2836. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-005-2426-510.1007/s10853-005-2426-5 ↗
9. Zháňal P, Harcuba P, Hájek M, Smola B, Stráský J, Šmilauerová J, VeselýJ Janeček M (2018) Evolution of ω phase during heating of metastable β titanium alloy Ti–15Mo. J Mater Sci 53:837–845. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1519-210.1007/s10853-017-1519-2 ↗
10. Monzen R, Kawai R, Watanabe C (2015) Effect of external stress on nucleation of ellipsoidal ω precipitates in a Ti–20 wt% Mo alloy. J Mater Sci 50:1876–1882. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-014-8750-x10.1007/s10853-014-8750-x ↗
11. Hanada S, Izumi O (1987) Correlation of tensile properties, deformation modes, and phase stability in commercial β-phase titanium alloys. Metall Trans A 18:265–27110.1007/BF02825707 ↗
12. Min XH, Tsuzaki K, Emura S, Tsuchiya K (2012) Heterogeneous twin formation and its effect on tensile properties in Ti–Mo based beta titanium alloys. Mater Sci Eng A 554:53–6010.1016/j.msea.2012.06.009 ↗
13. Blackburn MJ, Feeny JA (1971) Stress-induced transformations in Ti–Mo alloys. J Inst Met 99:132–134
14. Crocker AG (1962) Twinned martensite. Acta Mater 10:113–12210.1016/0001-6160(62)90056-1 ↗
15. Tobe H, Kim YH, Inamura T, Hosoda H, Miyazaki S (2014) Origin of 332 twinning in metastable β–Ti alloys. Acta Mater 64:345–35510.1016/j.actamat.2013.10.048 ↗
16. Kawabata T, Kawasaki S, Izumi O (1998) Mechanical properties of TiNbTa single crystals at cryogenic temperatures. Acta Mater 46:2705–271510.1016/S1359-6454(97)00475-8 ↗
17. Lituinov VS, Rusakov GM (2000) Twinning on the {332}<113> system in unstable β titanium alloys. Phys Met Metallog 90:S96–S107
18. Takemoto Y, Hida M, Sakakibara A (1996) Martensitic {332}<113> twin in β type Ti–Mo Alloy. J Jpn Inst Met 60:1072–107810.2320/jinstmet1952.60.11_1072 ↗
19. Lai MJ, Tasan CC, Raabe D (2016) On the mechanism of 332 twinning in metastable β titanium alloys. Acta Mater 111:173–18610.1016/j.actamat.2016.03.040 ↗
20. Im YD, Lee YK, Park HK, Song KH (2017) Effect of the initial grain size and orientation on the formation of deformation twins in Ti–15Mo alloy. J Mater Sci 52:11668–11674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1314-010.1007/s10853-017-1314-0 ↗
21. Bertrand E, Castany P, Péron I, Gloriant T (2011) Twinning system selection in a metastable β-titanium alloy by Schmid factor analysis. Scr Mater 64:1110–111310.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.02.033 ↗
22. Barnett MR, Keshavarz Z, Beer AG, Ma X (2008) Non-Schmid behaviour during secondary twinning in a polycrystalline magnesium alloy. Acta Mater 56:5–1510.1016/j.actamat.2007.08.034 ↗
23. Lou C, Zhang XY, Ren Y (2015) Non-Schmid-based $$\{ 10\bar{1}2\}$$ { 10 1 ¯ 2 } twinning behavior in polycrystalline magnesium alloy. Mater Charact 107:249–25410.1016/j.matchar.2015.07.022 ↗
24. Jiang J, Godfrey A, Liu W, Liu Q (2008) Identification and analysis of twinning variants during compression of a Mg–Al–Zn alloy. Scr Mater 58:122–12510.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.09.047 ↗
25. Jonas JJ, Mu SJ, Al-Samman T, Gottstein G, Jiang L, Martin É (2011) The role of strain accommodation during the variant selection of primary twins in magnesium. Acta Mater 59:2046–205610.1016/j.actamat.2010.12.005 ↗
26. Mu SJ, Jonas JJ, Gottstein G (2012) Variant selection of primary, secondary and tertiary twins in a deformed Mg alloy. Acta Mater 60:2043–205310.1016/j.actamat.2012.01.014 ↗
27. Qin H, Jonas JJ (2014) Variant selection during secondary and tertiary twinning in pure titanium. Acta Mater 75:198–21110.1016/j.actamat.2014.04.065 ↗
28. Xu S, Schuman C, Lecomte JS (2016) Accommodative $$ \{ 10\bar{1}2\} $$ { 10 1 ¯ 2 } twins at high angle grain boundaries in rolled pure titanium. Scr Mater 116:152–15610.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.02.005 ↗
29. Wang SY, Zhang YD, Schuman C, Lecomte JS, Zhao X, Zuo L, Philippe MJ, Esling C (2015) Study of twinning/detwinning behaviors of Ti by interrupted in situ tensile tests. Acta Mater 82:424–43610.1016/j.actamat.2014.09.038 ↗
30. Guo Y, Schwiedrzik J, Michler J, Maeder X (2016) On the nucleation and growth of $$\{ 10\bar{2}2\}$$ { 10 2 ¯ 2 } twin in commercial purity. Acta Mater 120:292–30110.1016/j.actamat.2016.08.073 ↗
31. Urrutia IG, Li CL, Emura S, Min XH, Tsuchiya K (2016) Study of {332}<113> twinning in a multilayered Ti–10Mo–xFe (x = 1–3) alloy by ECCI and EBSD. Sci Technol Adv Mater 17:220–22810.1080/14686996.2016.1177439 ↗
32. Xin RL, Liang YC, Ding CH, Guo CF, Wang BS, Liu Q (2015) Geometrical compatibility factor analysis of paired extension twins in extruded Mg–Al–1Zn alloys. Mater Des 86:656–66310.1016/j.matdes.2015.07.130 ↗
33. Guo CF, Xin RL, Jb Xu, Song B, Liu Q (2015) Strain compatibility effect on the variant selection of connected twins in magnesium. Mater Des 76:71–7610.1016/j.matdes.2015.03.041 ↗
34. Liu GD, Xin RL, Liu FY, Liu Q (2016) Twinning characteristic in tension of magnesium alloys and its effect on mechanical properties. Mater Des 107:503–51010.1016/j.matdes.2016.06.073 ↗
35. Min XH, Tsuzaki K, Emura S, Sawakuchi T, Ii S, Tsuchiya K (2013) {332}<113> twinning systems selection in a β-type Ti–15Mo–5Zr polycrystalline alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 579:164–16910.1016/j.msea.2013.04.119 ↗
36. Wang J, Beyerlein IJ, Tome CN (2010) An atomic and probabilistic perspective on twin nucleation in Mg. Scr Mater 63:741–74610.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.01.047 ↗
37. Wang L, Eisenlohr P, Yang Y, Bieler TR, Crimp MA (2010) Nucleation of paired twins at grain boundaries in titanium. Scr Mater 63:827–83010.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.06.027 ↗
38. Zhou XY, Min XH, Emura S, Tsuchiya K (2017) Accommodative {332}<113> primary and secondary twinning in a slightly deformed β-type Ti–Mo titanium alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 684:456–46510.1016/j.msea.2016.12.025 ↗
39. Min XH, Tsuzaki K, Emura S, Tsuchiya K (2011) Enhancement of uniform elongation in high strength Ti–Mo based alloys by combination of deformation modes. Mater Sci Eng A 528:4569–457810.1016/j.msea.2011.02.071 ↗
40. Moussa C, Bernacki M, Besnard R, Bozzolo N (2017) Statistical analysis of dislocations and dislocation boundaries from EBSD data. Ultramicroscopy 179:63–7210.1016/j.ultramic.2017.04.005 ↗
41. Fujiyama K, Mori K, Kaneko D, Kmachi H, Saito T, Ishii R, Hino T (2009) Creep damage assessment of 10Cr–1Mo–1W–VNbN steel forging through EBSD observation. Int J Press Vessels Pip 86:570–57710.1016/j.ijpvp.2009.04.011 ↗
42. Suresh KS, Bhaumik SK, Suwas S (2013) Effect of thermal and thermo-mechanical cycling on the microstructure of Ni-rich NiTi shape memory alloys. Mater Lett 99:150–15310.1016/j.matlet.2013.03.014 ↗
43. Wright SI, Nowell MM, Field DP (2011) A review of strain analysis using electron backscatter diffraction. Microsc Microanal 17:316–32910.1017/S1431927611000055 ↗
44. Calcagnotto M, Ponge D, Demir E, Raabe D (2010) Orientation gradients and geometrically necessary dislocations in ultrafine grained dual-phase steels studied by 2D and 3D EBSD. Mater Sci Eng A 527:2738–274610.1016/j.msea.2010.01.004 ↗