journal article·2016-03

Effect of compounding method and processing conditions on the electrical response of exfoliated graphite nanoplatelet/polylactic acid nanocomposite films

Erin M. Sullivan, Rosario A. Gerhardt, Ben Wang, Kyriaki Kalaitzidou

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 51· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

The focus of this study is to understand the effect of compounding method and polymer physical properties on the electrical response of exfoliated graphite nanoplatelet (GNP)/polylactic acid (PLA) nanocomposite films. Two compounding methods were employed: (i) melt mixing, followed by compression molding, and (ii) solution mixing once the polymer was dissolved in chloroform, followed by solution casting. The physical properties of the polymer, namely the crystallization characteristics were altered using two different cooling rates during compression molding: (i) slow cooling and (ii) fast cooling. The microstructure of the films was examined using scanning electron microscopy. Thermal properties, crystallization behavior, and electrical behavior were determined as a function of the GNP content, compounding method, and cooling rate using differential scanning calorimetry, X-ray diffraction, and impedance spectroscopy, respectively. It was concluded that the SC films had the lowest percolation threshold between 1 and 5 wt% of GNP, followed by the solution-cast films with percolation threshold between 5 and 8 wt% of GNP. The FC films did not percolate until a GNP content of 15 wt% was used. The vast differences in percolation thresholds are attributed to the differences in polymer matrix crystallinity and composite microstructure both in terms of microporosity and GNP dispersion/distribution within the polymer due to the different cooling rates and different compounding methods employed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Polymer crystallization and properties · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. Zweben C (1998) Advances in composite materials for thermal management in electronic packaging. JOM-J Miner Met Mater Soc 50:47–5110.1007/s11837-998-0128-6 ↗
2. Tong XC (2011) Advanced materials for thermal management of electronic packaging. Springer, New York10.1007/978-1-4419-7759-5 ↗
3. Ponomarenko AT, Shevchenko VG, Enikolopyan NS (1990) Formation processes and properties of conducting polymer composites. Adv Polym Sci 96:125–14710.1007/3-540-52791-5_4 ↗
4. Ou RQ, Gupta S, Parker CA, Gerhardt RA (2006) Fabrication and electrical conductivity of poly(Methyl Methacrylate) (PMMA)/Carbon Black (Cb) composites: comparison between an ordered carbon black nanowire-like segregated structure and a randomly dispersed carbon black nanostructure. J Phys Chem B 110:22365–2237310.1021/jp064498o ↗
5. Kalaitzidou K, Fukushima H, Askeland P, Drzal LT (2008) The nucleating effect of exfoliated graphite nanoplatelets and their influence on the crystal structure and electrical conductivity of polypropylene nanocomposites. J Mater Sci 43:2895–2907. doi: 10.1007/s10853-007-1876-310.1007/s10853-007-1876-3 ↗
6. Sullivan E, Oh Y, Gerhardt R, Wang B, Kalaitzidou K (2014) Understanding the effect of polymer crystallinity on the electrical conductivity of exfoliated graphite nanoplatelet/polylactic acid composite films. J Polym Res 21:1–910.1007/s10965-014-0563-8 ↗
7. Aharony A, Stauffer D (2003) Introduction to percolation theory. Taylor & Francis, London
8. Gokturk HS, Fiske TJ, Kalyon DM (1993) Effects of particle-shape and size distributions on the electrical and magnetic-properties of nickel/polyethylene composites. J Appl Polym Sci 50:1891–190110.1002/app.1993.070501105 ↗
9. Jing X, Zhao W, Lan L (2000) The effect of particle size on electric conducting percolation threshold in polymer/conducting particle composites. J Mater Sci Lett 19:377–379. doi: 10.1515/polyeng-2014-020610.1023/A:1006774318019 ↗
10. Clingerman ML, Weber EH, King JA, Schulz KH (2003) Development of an additive equation for predicting the electrical conductivity of carbon-filled composites. J Appl Polym Sci 88:2280–229910.1002/app.11938 ↗
11. Chodak I, Krupa I (1999) “Percolation Effect” and mechanical behavior of carbon black filled polyethylene. J Mater Sci Lett 18:1457–1459. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.03.01310.1023/A:1006665527806 ↗
12. Kalaitzidou K, Fukushima H, Drzal LT (2010) A route for polymer nanocomposites with engineered electrical conductivity and percolation threshold. Materials 3:1089–110310.3390/ma3021089 ↗
13. Lunt J (1998) Large-scale production, properties and commercial applications of polylactic acid polymers. Polym Degrad Stab 59:145–15210.1016/S0141-3910(97)00148-1 ↗
14. Drumright RE, Gruber PR, Henton DE (2000) Polylactic acid technology. Adv Mater 12:1841–184610.1002/1521-4095(200012)12:23<1841::AID-ADMA1841>3.0.CO;2-E ↗
15. Murariu M, Dechief AL, Bonnaud L, Paint Y, Gallos A, Fontaine G, Bourbigot S, Dubois P (2010) The production and properties of polylactide composites filled with expanded graphite. Polym Degrad Stab 95:889–90010.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2009.12.019 ↗
16. Jiang X, Drzal LT (2012) Multifunctional high-density polyethylene nanocomposites produced by incorporation of exfoliated graphene nanoplatelets 2: crystallization, thermal and electrical properties. Polym Compos 33:636–64210.1002/pc.22187 ↗
17. Kalaitzidou K, Fukushima H, Drzal LT (2007) Multifunctional polypropylene composites produced by incorporation of exfoliated graphite nanoplatelets. Carbon 45:1446–145210.1016/j.carbon.2007.03.029 ↗
18. Petersson L, Oksman K (2006) biopolymer based nanocomposites: comparing layered silicates and microcrystalline cellulose as nanoreinforcement. Compos Sci Technol 66:2187–219610.1016/j.compscitech.2005.12.010 ↗
19. Ray SS, Yamada K, Okamoto M, Fujimoto Y, Ogami A, Ueda K (2003) New polylactide/layered silicate nanocomposites. 5. designing of materials with desired properties. Polymer 44:6633–664610.1016/j.polymer.2003.08.021 ↗
20. Byun Y, Whiteside S, Thomas R, Dharman M, Hughes J, Kim YT (2012) The effect of solvent mixture on the properties of solvent cast polylactic acid (PLA) film. J Appl Polym Sci 124:3577–358210.1002/app.34071 ↗
21. Rhim JW, Mohanty AK, Singh SP, Ng PKW (2006) Effect of the processing methods on the performance of polylactide films: thermocompression versus solvent casting. J Appl Polym Sci 101:3736–374210.1002/app.23403 ↗
22. Krikorian V, Pochan DJ (2004) Unusual crystallization behavior of organoclay reinforced poly(L-Lactic Acid) nanocomposites. Macromolecules 37:6480–649110.1021/ma049283w ↗
23. Hoogsteen W, Postema AR, Pennings AJ, Tenbrinke G, Zugenmaier P (1990) Crystal-structure, conformation, and morphology of solution-spun poly(L-Lactide) fibers. Macromolecules 23:634–64210.1021/ma00204a041 ↗
24. Gopakumar TG, Page D (2004) polypropylene/graphite nanocomposites by thermo-kinetic mixing. Polym Eng Sci 44:1162–116910.1002/pen.20109 ↗
25. Pluta M, Galeski A (2002) Crystalline and supermolecular structure of polylactide in relation to the crystallization method. J Appl Polym Sci 86:1386–139510.1002/app.11280 ↗
26. Hebert JS, Wood-Adams P, Heuzey MC, Dubois C, Brisson J (2013) Morphology of polylactic acid crystallized during annealing after uniaxial deformation. J Polym Sci Part B 51:430–44010.1002/polb.23231 ↗
27. Langford JI, Wilson AJC (1978) Scherrer after 60 years-survey and some new results in determination of crystallite size. J Appl Crystallogr 11:102–11310.1107/S0021889878012844 ↗
28. Ezquerra TA, Connor MT, Roy S, Kulescza M, Fernandes-Nascimento J, Baltá-Calleja FJ (2001) Alternating-current electrical properties of graphite, carbon-black and carbon-fiber polymeric composites. Compos Sci Technol 61:903–90910.1016/S0266-3538(00)00176-7 ↗
29. Gerhardt RA (2005) Impedance spectroscopy and mobility spectra. In: Bassani F, Liedl GL, Wyder P (eds) Encyclopedia of condensed matter physics. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 350–36310.1016/B0-12-369401-9/00685-9 ↗
30. Sandler JKW, Kirk JE, Kinloch IA, Shaffer MSP, Windle AH (2003) Ultra-low electrical percolation threshold in carbon-nanotube-epoxy composites. Polymer 44:5893–589910.1016/S0032-3861(03)00539-1 ↗
31. Lewis TJ (1990) Charge transport, charge injection and breakdown in polymeric insulators. J Phys D 23:1469–147810.1088/0022-3727/23/12/001 ↗
32. Ramanathan T, Stankovich S, Dikin DA, Liu H, Shen H, Nguyen ST, Brinson LC (2007) Graphitic nanofillers in PMMA nanocomposites—an investigation of particle size influence on nanocomposite and dispersion and their properties. J Polym Sci Part B 45:2097–211210.1002/polb.21187 ↗
33. Cho D, Lee S, Yang GM, Fukushima H, Drzal LT (2005) Dynamic mechanical and thermal properties of phenylethynyl-terminated polyimide composites reinforced with expanded graphite nanoplatelets. Macromol Mater Eng 290:179–18710.1002/mame.200400281 ↗
34. Mackay ME, Dao TT, Tuteja A, Ho DL, Van Horn B, Kim HC, Hawker CJ (2003) Nanoscale effects leading to non-einstein-like decrease in viscosity. Nat Mater 2:762–76610.1038/nmat999 ↗