Influence of processing on the microstructure of Cu–8Cr–4Nb
Source abstract
Abstract
The particle-strengthened Cu–8 at.%Cr–4 at.%Nb alloy is processed by consolidation of atomized powders followed by extrusion to obtain bars and rolling to produce sheets. Comparison of copper matrix grain and second-phase particle structures in both extruded and rolled Cu–8Cr–4Nb was performed. Extruded material displayed locally banded arrangements of Cr2Nb particles, while the distribution of particles was more uniform in rolled material. Mean Cr2Nb particle sizes were found to be essentially the same for both processing methods. Non-spherical particles in the extruded alloy showed some preferred orientation, whereas the rolled material displayed a more uniform particle orientation distribution. Extruded material exhibited a dual grain size distribution with smaller grains in banded regions. The mean grain size of 1.36 μm in extruded material was larger than the 0.65 μm grain size of rolled material. A [101] texture was evident in extruded material, whereas the rolled material was only slightly textured along the [001] and [111] directions. The processing differences for the rolled and extruded forms give rise to different microstructures and hence higher creep strength for the extruded material in the temperature range of 773–923 K.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Advanced materials and composites · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (14)
Show source-provided references
1. Anderson KR, Groza JR, Dreshfield RL, Ellis D (1993) Mater Sci Eng A 169:167–17510.1016/0921-5093(93)90611-H ↗
2. Venkatraman M, Neumann JP (1986) Bull Alloy Phase Diagrams 5:462–466. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0286781110.1007/BF02867811 ↗
3. (a) Chakrabati DJ, Laughlin DE (1982) Bull Alloy Phase Diagrams 2:507;10.1007/BF02876180 ↗
4. (b) Chakrabati DJ, Laughlin DE (1984) Bull Alloy Phase Diagrams 5:59, 9910.1007/BF02868727 ↗
5. Thoma DJ, Perepezko JH (1992) Mater Sci Eng A 156:97–10810.1016/0921-5093(92)90420-6 ↗
6. Decker MW, Groza JR, Gibeling JC (2004) Mater Sci Eng A 369:101–11110.1016/j.msea.2003.10.306 ↗
7. Ellis DL, Michal GM (1999, Sep) NASA Contractor Report 185144
8. Ellis DL, Misra AK, Dreshfield RL (1996) In: Thompson AW, Moody NR (eds) Proceedings of the fifth international conference on the effect of hydrogen on the behavior of materials. TMS, Warrendale, pp 1049–1056
9. Anderson KR, Groza JR, Dreshfield RL, Ellis D (1995) Metall Mater Trans A 26:2197–2206. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0267123510.1007/BF02671235 ↗
10. Anderson KR, Groza JR (2001) Metall Mater Trans A 32:1211–1224. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-001-0130-x10.1007/s11661-001-0130-x ↗
11. Decker MW (2003) Constant stress creep properties of extruded Cu-8Cr-4Nb (GRCop-84). M.S. Thesis, University of California, Davis
12. Kelly PM (1973) Int Met Rev 18:3110.1179/imr.1973.18.1.31 ↗
13. Shewmon PG (1983) Transformations in metals. J. Williams Book Company, Oklahoma, pp 69–125
14. Ellis DL, Garg A (to be published) Annealing behavior of GRCop-84. NASA Technical Memorandum. NASA Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, OH