Properties of biocomposites: influence of preparation method, testing environment and a comparison with theoretical models
Source abstract
Abstract
Biocomposites were prepared by solvent casting from poly(vinyl) alcohol and mechanically microfibrillated (MFC) birch pulp. Preparations varied in concentration of polymer solution, mixing time of cellulose/PVA dispersion and were either degassed or not. In addition, specimens were tested in different levels of relative humidity at a constant temperature. The results show that the preparation method has a significant influence on mechanical properties. It was observed that aggregation of microfibrills was easier at lower concentrations of polymer solution leading to inferior properties of composites. Degassing provided increase in Young’s modulus and tensile strength at MFC loads below 10% (w/w). However, there was no significant change in composites density. Longer mixing time significantly deteriorated mechanical properties of biocomposites. The relative humidity proved to be very important factor. The properties of composites conditioned at 45% RH showed higher strength and stiffness properties than conditioned at 55 %RH. The experimental data were in a good agreement with percolation model.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. Lars B (2005) In: Amar MK, Manjusri M, Drzal LT (eds) Natural fibers, biopolymers and biocomposites. Taylor & Francis, Routledge
2. William HBrown (ed) (1988) Introduction to organic chemistry, 4th edn. Brooks/Cole publishing company, California
3. Azizi SM, Said A, Alloin F, Dufresne A (2005) Biomacromolecules 6:61210.1021/bm0493685 ↗
4. Hubbe MA, Rojas OJ, Lucia LA et al (2008) BioResources 3:92910.15376/biores.3.3.929-980 ↗
5. Dufresne A (2008) Can J Chem 86:48410.1139/v07-152 ↗
6. Eichhorn SJ, Dufresne A, Aranguren M et al (2010) J Mater Sci 45:1. doi: ESI-2010-00710.1007/s10853-009-3874-0 ↗
7. Orts WJ, Shey J, Imam SH et al (2005) J Environ Polym Degr 13:30110.1007/s10924-005-5514-3 ↗
8. Roohani M, Habibi Y, Belgacem NM et al (2008) Eur Polym J 44:248910.1016/j.eurpolymj.2008.05.024 ↗
9. Gopalan NK, Dufresne A (2003) Biomacromolecules 4:65710.1021/bm020127b ↗
10. Samir M, Alloin F, Dufresne A (2005) Biomacromolecules 6:61210.1021/bm0493685 ↗
11. Garcia DR, Thielemans W, Dufresne A (2006) Cellulose 13:26110.1007/s10570-005-9039-7 ↗
12. Nakagaito AN, Yano H (2004) Appl Phys A 78:54710.1007/s00339-003-2453-5 ↗
13. Zimmermann T, Pöhler E, Geiger T (2004) Adv Eng Mater 6:75410.1002/adem.200400097 ↗
14. Nakagaito AN, Yano H (2005) Appl Phys A 80:15510.1007/s00339-003-2225-2 ↗
15. Chakraborty A, Sain M, Kortschot M (2006) Holzforschung 60:5310.1515/HF.2006.010 ↗
16. Lu J, Wang T, Drzal LT (2008) Compos A 39:73810.1016/j.compositesa.2008.02.003 ↗
17. Cheng Q, Wang S, Rials T et al (2007) Cellulose 14:59310.1007/s10570-007-9141-0 ↗
18. Cheng Q, Wang S, Rials TG (2009) Compos A 40:21810.1016/j.compositesa.2008.11.009 ↗
19. Tang C, Liu H (2008) Compos A 39:163810.1016/j.compositesa.2008.07.005 ↗
20. Billmeyer FWJ (1984) Textbook of polymer science. Wiley, Singapore
21. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and the World Health Organization (WHO) (2004) Polyvinyl alcohol. ftp://ftp.fao.org/es/esn/jecfa/cta/CTA_61_PVA.pdf . Accessed 27 Nov 2010
22. Li H (2000) Macromolecules 33:46510.1021/ma990878e ↗
23. Cinelli P, Lawton JW, Gordon SH et al (2003) Macromoleculars no. 197:115
24. Said AS, Alloin F, Paillet M et al (2004) Macromolecules 37:431310.1021/ma035939u ↗
25. Nakagaito A, Yano H (2008) Cellulose 15:55510.1007/s10570-008-9212-x ↗
26. Lu J, Askeland P, Drzal LT (2008) Polymer 49:128510.1016/j.polymer.2008.01.028 ↗
27. Sakurada I, Nukushina Y, Ito T (1962) J Polym Sci 57:65110.1002/pol.1962.1205716551 ↗
28. Cheng Q, Wang S, Harper DP (2009) Compos A 40:58310.1016/j.compositesa.2009.02.011 ↗
29. Cox HL (1952) Br J Appl Phys 3:7210.1088/0508-3443/3/3/302 ↗
30. Davies WEA (1971) J Phys D 4:117610.1088/0022-3727/4/8/318 ↗
31. Davies WEA (1971) J Phys 4:31810.1088/0022-3727/4/2/318 ↗
32. Hill R (1963) J Mech Phys Solids 11:35710.1016/0022-5096(63)90036-X ↗
33. Hill R (1964) J Mech Phys Solids 12:21310.1016/0022-5096(64)90020-1 ↗
34. Affdl JCH, Kardos JL (1976) Polym Eng Sci 16:34410.1002/pen.760160512 ↗
35. Allen G, Bowden MJ, Todd SM et al (1974) Polymer 15:2810.1016/0032-3861(74)90070-6 ↗
36. Favier V, Chanzy H, Cavaille JY (1995) Macromolecules 28:636510.1021/ma00122a053 ↗
37. Favier V, Cavaille JY, Canova GR et al (1997) Polym Eng Sci 37:173210.1002/pen.11821 ↗
38. Chazeau L, Cavaillé JY, Canova G et al (1999) J Appl Polym Sci 71:179710.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19990314)71:11<1797::AID-APP9>3.0.CO;2-E ↗
39. Ouali N, Cavaille JY, Perez J (1991) Plast Rubber Compos Process Appl 16:55
40. Aharony A, Stauffer D (1994) Introduction to percolation theory, 2nd edn. Taylor & Francis, UK
41. Young RJ, Lovell PA (1991) Introduction to polymers, 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall, Cambridge10.1007/978-1-4899-3176-4 ↗
42. Taghizadeh MT, Mehrdad A (2003) Ultrason Sonochem 10:30910.1016/S1350-4177(03)00110-X ↗
43. Alexy P, Lacík I, Šimková B et al (2004) Polym Degrad Stab 85:82310.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2004.02.011 ↗