journal article·2008-09

Droplet cooling in atomization sprays

Arvind Prasad, Hani Henein

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 43· Issue 17
Publisher page

Abstract

Transport between droplets/particles and a gas phase plays an important role in numerous material processing operations. These include rapid solidification operations such as gas atomization and spray forming, as well as chemical systems such as flash furnaces. Chemical reaction rates and solidification are dependent on the rate of gas-particle or gas-droplet transport mechanisms. These gas-based processes are difficult to analyze due to their complexity which include particle and droplet distribution and the flow in a gas field having variations in temperature and velocity both in the jet cross-section and in the axial distance away from the jet source. Thus to study and properly identify the important variables in transport, these gas and droplet variations must be eliminated or controlled. This is done in this work using models based on a single fluid atomization system. Using a heat transport model (referred to as thermal model) validated using single fluid atomization of molten droplets and a microsegregation model, the effect of process variables on heat losses from droplets was examined. In this work, the effect of type of gas, droplet size, gas temperature, gas-droplet relative velocity on the heat transport from AA6061 droplets was examined. It is shown that for a given gas type, the most critical process variable is the gas temperature particularly as affected by two-way thermal coupling and the droplet size. The results are generalized and applied to explain the difference in droplet cooling rate from different atomization processes. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (14)

Show source-provided references
1. Ziesenis J, Tillwick J, Krauss M, Uhlenwinkel V (2000) In: Cooper KP et al (eds) Atomization: fundamentals and practice. TMS, Warrendale, PA, pp 61–70
2. Ting J, Connor J, Ridder S (2005) Mater Sci Eng A 390(1–2):452. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2004.08.06010.1016/j.msea.2004.08.060 ↗
3. Freyberg AV, Henein H, Uhlenwinkel V (2003) Mat Trans B 34B:243. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-003-0011-310.1007/s11663-003-0011-3 ↗
4. Henein H (2002) Mat Sci Eng A 326:9210.1016/S0921-5093(01)01429-0 ↗
5. Wiskel JB, Henein H, Maire E (2002) Can Metall Q 41(1):9710.1179/cmq.2002.41.1.97 ↗
6. Prasad A (2006) Microsegregation in rapidly solidified impulse atomized binary Al-Cu alloy. PhD thesis, University of Alberta
7. Yuan D (1997) The novel impulse atomization process. PhD thesis, University of Alberta
8. Crowe CT (2000) SDMA, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany, pp 757–769
9. Wiskel JB, Henein H, Maire E (2002) Can Metall Q 41(2):19310.1179/cmq.2002.41.2.193 ↗
10. Prasad A, Henein H, Gandin C-A (2007) In: Gandian C-A (ed) Modeling of casting, welding and advanced solidification processes XI. TMS, Warrendale
11. Rappaz M, Thevoz PH (1987) Acta Metall 35(7):1487. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6160(87)90094-010.1016/0001-6160(87)90094-0 ↗
12. Lipton J, Kurz W, Trivedi R (1987) Acta Metall 35(5):957. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6160(87)90174-X10.1016/0001-6160(87)90174-X ↗
13. Dorward RC, Bouvier C (1998) Mater Sci Eng A A254(1–2):33. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(98)00761-810.1016/S0921-5093(98)00761-8 ↗
14. Hildeman GJ, Lege DJ, Vasudevan AK (1982) In: Koczak MJ, Hildeman GJ (eds) High strength powder metallurgy aluminum alloys. TMS, Warrendale, PA, pp 249–276