Ring-on-ring strength measurements on rectangular glass slides
Source abstract
Abstract
The ring-on-ring test [1–6] has been standardized and used extensively for strength measurements on glasses and ceramics. Whereas bend bars suffer from flaws at their edges that dominate the strength, the edges of carefully prepared circular disks for ring-on-ring tests almost never fail from their edges. For these specimens, the mechanical defects in the surface determine their strength. Very often, specimens are of interest which are not of a circular shape and yet are tested using the ring-onring configuration. The stress and strain distributions of these specimens can deviate strongly from that of the circular disk for which stress–strain relations are available from literature [1]. This is the case for glass slides of rectangular shape. Figure 1a shows a slide of 25 · 75 mm in dimension, which is loaded by two rings 11 mm and 22 mm in diameter. In order to determine the stress distributions of such specimens, finite element computations were carried out with 1 mm and 1.5 mm slide thickness. The resulting tangential stresses, rt, and radial stresses, rr, on the tensile surface are given in a normalised representation
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Optical measurement and interference techniques · Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques · Railway Engineering and Dynamics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (9)
Show source-provided references
1. Ritter JE, Jakus K Jr, Batakis A, Bandyopadhyay N (1980) J Non-Cryst Sol 38 & 39:41910.1016/0022-3093(80)90455-X ↗
2. Giovan MN, Sines G (1981) J Am Ceram Soc 64:6810.1111/j.1151-2916.1981.tb09578.x ↗
3. Fessler H, Fricker DC (1984) J Am Ceram Soc 67:58210.1111/j.1151-2916.1984.tb19598.x ↗
4. Soltész U, Richter H, Kienzler R (1987) The concentric-ring test and its application for determining the surface strength of ceramics, in High Tech Ceramics. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, 149
5. Adler, WF, Mihora, DJ (1992) Biaxial flexure testing: analysis and experimental results. In: Bradt RC et al. (ed) Fracture mechanics of ceramics, vol 10. Plenum Press, New York, p 22710.1007/978-1-4615-3348-1_14 ↗
6. ASTM Standard C 1499–03 (2003) Monotonic equibiaxial flexural strength of advanced ceramics at ambient temperature. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA
7. Fett T, Guin JP, Wiederhorn SM (2005) Fatigue Fract Engng Mater Struct 28:50710.1111/j.1460-2695.2005.00888.x ↗
8. Thoman DR, Bain LJ, Antle CE (1969) Technometrics 11:44510.1080/00401706.1969.10490706 ↗
9. European Standard ENV 843–5, Advanced monolithic ceramics - mechanical tests at room temperature - statistical analysis