Yield strength enhancement of martensitic steel through titanium addition
Source abstract
Abstract
Yield strength enhancement for martensitic steel fabricated by vacuum induction melting is investigated. It is found that the addition of Ti can improve the yield strength property of the martensitic steel, which can be attributed to increase in precipitation hardening from formation of TiC precipitates in the martensitic matrix. Moreover, the yield strength can be further enhanced by tempering and reheat quenching process, which can be ascribed to the formation of a superfine sized (~8 μm) grains and large amount of freshly nano-sized (1–10 nm) precipitates in the final martensitic structure for martensitic steel containing Ti. The experimental and theoretical results on the contribution of TiC precipitates to hardening of the martensitic steel are in excellent agreement, showing that the precipitation hardening of 188 MPa caused by TiC precipitates is the main reason why the yield strength for martensitic steel is enhanced via titanium addition.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Abd-Allah NM, El-Fadaly MS, Megahed MM, Eleiche AM, Mater J (2001) Eng Perform 10:57610.1361/105994901770344728 ↗
2. Ezugwu EO, Olajire KA (2002) Tribol Lett 12:18310.1023/A:1014711308163 ↗
3. Yilmaz R, Türkyilmazoglu A (2007) Adv Mater Res 23:31910.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.23.319 ↗
4. Bhavsar RB, Montani E (1998) Corrosion 98:22
5. Oliver DA, Harris GT (1952) Iron Steel Inst 43:46
6. Davies WT, Hall B (1967) The Iron and Steel Inst 97:561
7. Angeliu T, Hall EL, Larsen M, Linsebigler A, Mukira C (1999) Inst Mater 708:234
8. Parameswaran P, Vijayalakshmi M, Shankar P, Raghunathan VS (1992) J Mater Sci 27:5426. doi: 10.1007/BF00367811
9. Martin R, Mari D, Schaller R (2009) Mater Sci Eng A 521–522:11710.1016/j.msea.2008.09.159 ↗
10. Song YY, Ping DH, Yin FX, Li XY, Li YY (2010) Mater Sci Eng A 527:61410.1016/j.msea.2009.08.022 ↗
11. Bhambri SK (1986) J Mater Sci 21:1741. doi: 10.1007/BF0111473410.1007/BF01114734 ↗
12. Ikeda S, Sakai T, Fine ME (1977) J Mater Sci 12:675. doi: 10.1007/BF0054815710.1007/BF00548157 ↗
13. Barani AA, Li F, Romano P, Ponge D, Raabe D (2007) Mater Sci Eng A 463:13810.1016/j.msea.2006.08.124 ↗
14. Yaggee FL, Gilbert ER, Styles JW (1969) J Less Common Met 19:3910.1016/0022-5088(69)90083-6 ↗
15. Baviera P, Harel S, Garem H, Grosbras M (2001) Scripta Mater 44:272110.1016/S1359-6462(01)00963-0 ↗
16. Mani A, Aubert P, Mercier F, Khodja H, Berthier C, Houdy P (2005) Surf Coat Technol 194:19010.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.06.017 ↗
17. Li SB, Xiang WH, Zhai HX, Zhou Y (2008) Powder Technol 185:4910.1016/j.powtec.2007.09.018 ↗
18. Cao JC, Yong QL, Liu QY, Sun XJ (2007) J Mater Sci 42:10080. doi: 10.1007/s10853-007-2000-410.1007/s10853-007-2000-4 ↗
19. Sagaradze VS (1970) Met Sci Heat Treat 12:19810.1007/BF00657795 ↗
20. Friedman LH, Chrzan DC (1998) Phys Rev Lett 83:271510.1103/PhysRevLett.81.2715 ↗