Analysis of particle rolling and intrinsic rotations in copper powder during sintering
Source abstract
Abstract
The common theoretical model used to describe the sintering process is the two particle model. This model describes comprehensively the growth of inter-particle contacts driven by the Laplace pressure. In three dimensions this model fails as cooperative material transport (i.e., movements of powder particles) occurs. The fundamental understanding of these processes is still rather sketchy and is derived from the observation of 1D or 2D samples. To observe and quantify cooperative material transport new experimental methods are needed, for example high resolution computer tomography in conjunction with photogrammetric image analysis. Single-crystal copper spheres were marked by drilling holes into the surface of each particle and two samples were prepared using the marked powder. One sample was heated continuously to 1,050 °C in a silica capillary and was analyzed by in situ synchrotron computer tomography (SCT) at the European synchrotron radiation facility in Grenoble. Free sintering was investigated by ex-situ SCT at Bessy II in Berlin. The novel technique of drilling holes into the sphere surfaces allows for the quantification of both intrinsic rotations and particle rolling by photogrammetry. The observed intrinsic rotations exceed the rolling by far and we conclude that the anisotropy of grain boundary energies results in grain boundary sliding. Furthermore, we present first computer simulations of sintering processes based on initial particle positions measured by SCT.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Powder Metallurgy Techniques and Materials · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Microstructure and mechanical properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. German RM (1996) Sintering theory and practice. Wiley, New York
2. Schatt W, Wieters K-P, Kieback B (2007) Pulvermetallurgie: technologien und werkstoffe. Springer, New York10.1007/978-3-540-68112-0 ↗
3. German RM (2005) Powder metallurgy and particulate materials processing. Metal Powder Industries Federation, Princeton
4. Exner HE and Kraft T (1998) Review on computer simulations of sintering processes. In: Proceedings of powder metallurgy world congress, Granada (Spain), vol 2. European Powder Metallurgy Association, Shrewsbury, pp 278–283
5. Exner HE (1979) Rev Powder Met Phys Ceram 1:7
6. Schatt W (1992) Sintervorgänge. VDI-Verlag, Düsseldorf
7. Geguzin JE (1973) Physik des Sinterns. VEB Deutscher Verlag für Grundstoffindustrie, Leipzig
8. German RM (1994) Powder metallurgy science, 2nd edn. Metal Powder Industries Federation, Princeton
9. Mykura H (1979) Acta Metall 27:24310.1016/0001-6160(79)90102-0 ↗
10. Wieters K-P, Boiko IJ, Schatt W (1984) Cryst Res Technol 19:119510.1002/crat.2170190909 ↗
11. Pond RC, Smith DA (1977) Scripta Metall 11:7710.1016/0036-9748(77)90017-5 ↗
12. Chan SW, Balluffi RW (1986) Acta Metall 34:219110.1016/0001-6160(86)90164-1 ↗
13. Weiser MW, De Jonghe LC (1986) J Am Ceram Soc 69:82210.1111/j.1151-2916.1986.tb07367.x ↗
14. Exner HE, Müller C (2009) J Am Ceram Soc 92:138410.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.02978.x ↗
15. Skorokhod VV (1999) Powder Metall Metal Ceram 38:35010.1007/BF02676168 ↗
16. Eloff PC, Lenel FV (1971) The effects of mechanical constraints upon the early stages of sintering. Modern developments in powder metallurgy, vol 4. In: Proceedings of the international powder metallurgy conference. Plenum, New York, pp 291–302
17. Petzow G, Exner HE (1976) Z Metallkde 67:611
18. Sutton AP, Balluffi RW (2003) Interfaces in crystalline materials. Oxford University Press, New York
19. Petzow G, Exner HE (1976) Z Metallkd 67:611
20. Bernard D, Gendron D, Heintz J-M, Bordère S, Etourneau J (2005) Acta Mater 53:12110.1016/j.actamat.2004.09.027 ↗
21. Vagnon A et al (2008) Acta Mater 56:108410.1016/j.actamat.2007.11.008 ↗
22. Lame O, Bellet D, Di Michiel M, Bouvard D (2003) Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B 200:28710.1016/S0168-583X(02)01690-7 ↗
23. Lame O, Bellet D, Di Michiel M, Bouvard D (2004) Acta Mater 52:97710.1016/j.actamat.2003.10.032 ↗
24. Nöthe M, Schulze M, Grupp R, Kieback B, Haibel A (2007) Mater Sci For 539–543:2657
25. Grupp R, Nöthe M, Kieback B, Banhart J (2011) Nat Commun 2:29810.1038/ncomms1300 ↗
26. Sauerwald F, Holub L (1933) Z Elektrochem Angew Phys Chem 39:750
27. Wolf D (1990) J Mater Res 5:170810.1557/JMR.1990.1708 ↗
28. Riedel H, Zipse H, Svoboda J (1994) Acta Metall 42:44510.1016/0956-7151(94)90499-5 ↗
29. Verlet L (1967) Phys Rev 159:9810.1103/PhysRev.159.98 ↗
30. Henrich B, Wonisch A, Kraft T, Moseler M, Riedel H (2007) Acta Mater 55:75310.1016/j.actamat.2006.09.005 ↗
31. Swinkels FB, Ashby MF (1981) Acta Metall 29:25910.1016/0001-6160(81)90154-1 ↗