Regenerated cellulose microspheres-aerogel enabled sustainable removal of metal ions for water remediation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Aerogels and thermal insulation · Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. Chen D, Zhu H, Yang S et al (2016) Micro-nanocomposites in environmental management. Adv Mater 28:10443. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20160148610.1002/adma.201601486 ↗
2. Yap PL, Nine MJ, Hassan K, Tung TT, Tran DNH, Losic D (2020) Graphene-based sorbents for multipollutants removal in water: a review of recent progress. Adv Funct Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20200735610.1002/adfm.202007356 ↗
3. Zheng B, Lin X, Zhang X, Wu D, Matyjaszewski K (2019) Emerging functional porous polymeric and carbonaceous materials for environmental treatment and energy storage. Adv Funct Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20190700610.1002/adfm.201907006 ↗
4. Burakov AE, Galunin EV, Burakova IV et al (2018) Adsorption of heavy metals on conventional and nanostructured materials for wastewater treatment purposes: a review. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 148:702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.11.03410.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.11.034 ↗
5. Jiao C, Tao J, Xiong J et al (2017) In situ synthesis of MnO2-loaded biocomposite based on microcrystalline cellulose for Pb2+ removal from wastewater. Cellulose 24:2591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1271-410.1007/s10570-017-1271-4 ↗
6. Xiong J, Jiao C, Li C, Zhang D, Lin H, Chen Y (2014) A versatile amphiprotic cotton fiber for the removal of dyes and metal ions. Cellulose 21:3073. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0318-z10.1007/s10570-014-0318-z ↗
7. Xiong J, Tao J, Guo K et al (2015) A rational modification route to an amphiprotic cotton fiber as adsorbent for dyes. Fibers Polym 16:1512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-015-4738-710.1007/s12221-015-4738-7 ↗
8. Suhas VKG, Carrott PJM, Singh R, Chaudhary M, Kushwaha S (2016) Cellulose: a review as natural, modified and activated carbon adsorbent. Bioresour Technol 216:1066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.05.10610.1016/j.biortech.2016.05.106 ↗
9. Zagklis DP, Vavouraki AI, Kornaros ME, Paraskeva CA (2015) Purification of olive mill wastewater phenols through membrane filtration and resin adsorption/desorption. J Hazard Mater 285:69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.11.03810.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.11.038 ↗
10. Ersan G, Apul OG, Perreault F, Karanfil T (2017) Adsorption of organic contaminants by graphene nanosheets: a review. Water Res 126:385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.08.01010.1016/j.watres.2017.08.010 ↗
11. Xu J, Cao Z, Zhang Y et al (2018) A review of functionalized carbon nanotubes and graphene for heavy metal adsorption from water: preparation, application, and mechanism. Chemosphere 195:351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.06110.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.061 ↗
12. Maleki H (2016) Recent advances in aerogels for environmental remediation applications: a review. Chem Eng J 300:98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.04.09810.1016/j.cej.2016.04.098 ↗
13. Chen Y, Zhang L, Yang Y et al (2021) Recent progress on nanocellulose aerogels: preparation, modification, composite fabrication. Appl Adv Mater 33:e2005569. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20200556910.1002/adma.202005569 ↗
14. Xiong J, Zhang D, Lin H, Chen Y (2020) Amphiprotic cellulose mediated graphene oxide magnetic aerogels for water remediation. Chem Eng J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.12589010.1016/j.cej.2020.125890 ↗
15. Dilamian M, Noroozi B (2021) Rice straw agri-waste for water pollutant adsorption: relevant mesoporous super hydrophobic cellulose aerogel. Carbohyd Polym 251:117016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11701610.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117016 ↗
16. Zhou X, Fu Q, Liu H, Gu H, Guo Z (2021) Solvent-free nanoalumina loaded nanocellulose aerogel for efficient oil and organic solvent adsorption. J Colloid Interface Sci 581:299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2020.07.09910.1016/j.jcis.2020.07.099 ↗
17. Sun Y, Chu Y, Wu W, Xiao H (2021) Nanocellulose-based lightweight porous materials: a review. Carbohyd Polym 255:117489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11748910.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117489 ↗
18. Kameda T, Honda R, Kumagai S, Saito Y, Yoshioka T (2019) Uptake of heavy metal cations by chitosan-modified montmorillonite: kinetics and equilibrium studies. Mater Chem Phys 236:121784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.12178410.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.121784 ↗
19. Qi X, Zeng Q, Tong X et al (2021) Polydopamine/montmorillonite-embedded pullulan hydrogels as efficient adsorbents for removing crystal violet. J Hazard Mater 402:123359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.12335910.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123359 ↗
20. Xing X, Lv G, Zhu W et al (2015) The binding energy between the interlayer cations and montmorillonite layers and its influence on Pb2+ adsorption. Appl Clay Sci 112–113:117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2015.04.01710.1016/j.clay.2015.04.017 ↗
21. Li Y, Wang X, Wang J (2011) Cation exchange, interlayer spacing, and thermal analysis of Na/Ca-montmorillonite modified with alkaline and alkaline earth metal ions. J Therm Anal Calorim 110:1199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-011-2109-110.1007/s10973-011-2109-1 ↗
22. Jiang J, Oguzlu H, Jiang F (2021) 3D printing of lightweight, super-strong yet flexible all-cellulose structure. Chem Eng J 405:126668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.12666810.1016/j.cej.2020.126668 ↗
23. Song P, Liu B, Liang C et al (2021) Lightweight, flexible cellulose-derived carbon aerogel@reduced graphene oxide/PDMS composites with outstanding EMI shielding performances and excellent thermal conductivities. Nano Micro Lett 13:91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-021-00624-410.1007/s40820-021-00624-4 ↗
24. Ahmadzadeh S, Desobry S, Keramat J, Nasirpour A (2016) Crystalline structure and morphological properties of porous cellulose/clay composites: the effect of water and ethanol as coagulants. Carbohyd Polym 141:211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.01.01710.1016/j.carbpol.2016.01.017 ↗
25. Ahmadzadeh S, Nasirpour A, Keramat J, Desobry S (2015) Effect of surface-modified montmorillonite on viscosity and gelation behavior of cellulose/NaOH solution. Cellulose 22:1829. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0597-z10.1007/s10570-015-0597-z ↗
26. Koklukaya O, Carosio F, Wagberg L (2017) Superior flame-resistant cellulose nanofibril aerogels modified with hybrid layer-by-layer coatings. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:29082. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b0801810.1021/acsami.7b08018 ↗
27. Zhao Y, Zhong K, Liu W, Cui S, Zhong Y, Jiang S (2020) Preparation and oil adsorption properties of hydrophobic microcrystalline cellulose aerogel. Cellulose 27:7663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-03309-010.1007/s10570-020-03309-0 ↗
28. Chen J, Liu X, Li G et al (2011) Synthesis and characterization of novel SiO2 and TiO2 co-pillared montmorillonite composite for adsorption and photocatalytic degradation of hydrophobic organic pollutants in water. Catal Today 164:364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2010.11.01410.1016/j.cattod.2010.11.014 ↗
29. Sescousse R, Smacchia A, Budtova T (2010) Influence of lignin on cellulose-NaOH-water mixtures properties and on aerocellulose morphology. Cellulose 17:1137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-010-9448-010.1007/s10570-010-9448-0 ↗
30. Mekhloufi M, Zehhaf A, Benyoucef A, Quijada C, Morallon E (2013) Removal of 8-quinolinecarboxylic acid pesticide from aqueous solution by adsorption on activated montmorillonites. Environ Monit Assess 185:10365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-013-3338-510.1007/s10661-013-3338-5 ↗
31. Vaezi K, Asadpour G, Sharifi SH (2020) Bio nanocomposites based on cationic starch reinforced with montmorillonite and cellulose nanocrystals: fundamental properties and biodegradability study. Int J Biol Macromol 146:374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.01.00710.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.01.007 ↗
32. Awang NA, Wan Salleh WN, Ismail AF, Yusof N, Aziz F, Jaafar J (2018) Adsorption behavior of chromium(VI) onto regenerated cellulose membrane. Ind Eng Chem Res 58:720. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.8b0236610.1021/acs.iecr.8b02366 ↗
33. Rouxhet PG, Genet MJ (2011) XPS analysis of bio-organic systems. Surf Interface Anal 43:1453. https://doi.org/10.1002/sia.383110.1002/sia.3831 ↗
34. Cui S, Wang X, Zhang X et al (2017) Preparation of magnetic MnFe2O4-cellulose aerogel composite and its kinetics and thermodynamics of Cu(II) adsorption. Cellulose 25:735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1598-x10.1007/s10570-017-1598-x ↗
35. Xing J, Xu Z, Deng B (2018) Enhanced oxidation resistance of polyphenylene sulfide composites based on montmorillonite modified by benzimidazolium salt. Polymers (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1001008310.3390/polym10010083 ↗
36. Kaur M, Arshad M, Ullah A (2018) In-situ nanoreinforced green bionanomaterials from natural keratin and montmorillonite (MMT)/cellulose nanocrystals (CNC). ACS Sustain Chem Eng 6:1977. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b0338010.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03380 ↗
37. Khan AH, Nurnabi M, Bala P (2009) Studies on thermal transformation of Na–montmorillonite–glycine intercalation compounds. J Therm Anal Calorim 96:929. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-009-0067-710.1007/s10973-009-0067-7 ↗
38. Chen D, Chen J, Luan X, Ji H, Xia Z (2011) Characterization of anion–cationic surfactants modified montmorillonite and its application for the removal of methyl orange. Chem Eng J 171:1150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2011.05.01310.1016/j.cej.2011.05.013 ↗
39. Kiziltas A, Gardner DJ, Han Y, Yang H-S (2010) Thermal properties of microcrystalline cellulose-filled PET–PTT blend polymer composites. J Therm Anal Calorim 103:163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-010-0894-610.1007/s10973-010-0894-6 ↗
40. Song J, Chen C, Yang Z et al (2018) Highly compressible, anisotropic aerogel with aligned cellulose nanofibers. ACS Nano 12:140. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.7b0424610.1021/acsnano.7b04246 ↗
41. Chong KY, Chia CH, Zakaria S, Sajab MS, Chook SW, Khiew PS (2015) CaCO3-decorated cellulose aerogel for removal of congo red from aqueous solution. Cellulose 22:2683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0675-210.1007/s10570-015-0675-2 ↗
42. Geng H (2018) A facile approach to light weight, high porosity cellulose aerogels. Int J Biol Macromol 118:921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.06.16710.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.06.167 ↗
43. Zhang T, Zhang W, Xi H et al (2021) Polydopamine functionalized cellulose-MXene composite aerogel with superior adsorption of methylene blue. Cellulose 28:4281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-021-03737-610.1007/s10570-021-03737-6 ↗
44. Maatar W, Boufi S (2017) Microporous cationic nanofibrillar cellulose aerogel as promising adsorbent of acid dyes. Cellulose 24:1001. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-1162-010.1007/s10570-016-1162-0 ↗
45. Liu X, Xu M, An B et al (2019) A facile hydrothermal method–fabricated robust and ultralight weight cellulose nanocrystal-based hydro/aerogels for metal ion removal. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:25583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05810-x10.1007/s11356-019-05810-x ↗
46. Zhang J, Wang Y, Liang D, Xiao Z, Xie Y, Li J (2020) Sulfhydryl-modified chitosan aerogel for the adsorption of heavy metal ions and organic dyes. Ind Eng Chem Res 59:14531. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.0c0231710.1021/acs.iecr.0c02317 ↗
47. Buchaver M (1973) Contamination of soil and vegetation near a zinc smelter by zinc, cadmium, copper and lead. Environ Sci Technol 7:131–13510.1021/es60074a004 ↗
48. Dong Z, Zhang F, Wang D, Liu X, Jin J (2015) Polydopamine-mediated surface-functionalization of graphene oxide for heavy metal ions removal. J Solid State Chem 224:88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssc.2014.06.03010.1016/j.jssc.2014.06.030 ↗
49. Akpomie KG, Conradie J (2020) Advances in application of cotton-based adsorbents for heavy metals trapping, surface modifications and future perspectives. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 201:110825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.11082510.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110825 ↗