Mechanical properties and failure mechanisms of composite laminates with classical fabric stacking patterns
Source abstract
Abstract
In the design of composite materials, the properties and failure modes/mechanisms are always of the main concern. In this work, the mechanical properties and failure mechanisms of composite laminates with classical fabric stacking patterns ([(0, 90)]8 and [(0, 90)/(± 45)]4) were systematically investigated through mechanical experiments and FEM (finite element method) numerical simulations. The results show that the tensile modulus and bending modulus of the laminates were reduced by 22.2% and 37% after partially changing the stacking angle to ± 45°, but corresponding elongation and bending displacement were increased by 8.8% and 11.7%, respectively. Bending failure mode changes from complete fracture to partial fracture. Meanwhile, the delamination damage and tow peeling from the matrix increase significantly. FEM simulations on tensile and bending processes of the composites indicate that the ± 45° stacking angle leads to the change of the axial stress direction from SX (0°) to SY (± 45°), which is difficult to be observed from mechanical experiments. The FEM simulation provides a cost effective and efficient way for the structural visual optimization design and failure prediction of the actual composite materials.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Textile materials and evaluations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Hart KR, Chia PXL, Sheridan LE, Wetzel ED, Sottos NR, White SR (2017) Mechanisms and characterization of impact damage in 2D and 3D woven fiber-reinforced composites. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 101:432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.07.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2017.07.004 ↗
2. Chikhi N, Bakar M (2002) Modification of epoxy resin using reactive liquid (ATBN) rubber. Eur Polymer J 38:251. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-3057(01)00194-X10.1016/S0014-3057(01)00194-X ↗
3. Zhang Q, Cai J, Gao Q (2014) Simulation and experimental study on thermal deep drawing of carbon fiber woven composites. J Mater Process Technol 214:802–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.11.02410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.11.024 ↗
4. Machado CM, Silva D, Vidal C, Soares B, Teixeira JP (2021) A new approach to assess delamination in drilling carbon fibre-reinforced epoxy composite materials. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 112:3389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-06636-z10.1007/s00170-021-06636-z ↗
5. Aydin L, Aydin O, Artem HS, Mert A (2016) Design of dimensionally stable composites using efficient global optimization method. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part L J Mater Des Appl 233:156. https://doi.org/10.1177/146442071666492110.1177/1464420716664921 ↗
6. Chen Q, Boisse P, Park CH, Saouab A, Bréard J (2011) Intra/inter-ply shear behaviors of continuous fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites in thermoforming processes. Compos Struct 93:1692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.01.00210.1016/j.compstruct.2011.01.002 ↗
7. Jefferson Andrew J, Arumugam V (2017) Effect of patch hybridization on the tensile behavior of patch repaired glass/epoxy composite laminates using acoustic emission monitoring. Int J Adhes Adhes 74:155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.01.01410.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.01.014 ↗
8. Gupta A, Fidan I, Hasanov S, Nasirov A (2020) Processing, mechanical characterization, and micrography of 3D-printed short carbon fiber reinforced polycarbonate polymer matrix composite material. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 107:3185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05195-z10.1007/s00170-020-05195-z ↗
9. Mohamed MN, Kumar AP (2017) Numerical and experimental study of the effect of orientation and stacking sequence on petalling of composite cylindrical tubes under axial compression. Proc Eng 173:1407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.12.20110.1016/j.proeng.2016.12.201 ↗
10. Li Y, Li R, Lu L, Huang X (2015) Experimental study of damage characteristics of carbon woven fabric/epoxy laminates subjected to lightning strike. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 79:164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.09.01910.1016/j.compositesa.2015.09.019 ↗
11. Breitzman TD, Iarve EV, Cook BM, Schoeppner GA, Lipton RP (2009) Optimization of a composite scarf repair patch under tensile loading. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 40:1921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.04.03310.1016/j.compositesa.2009.04.033 ↗
12. Liu PF, Yang J, Wang B, Zhou ZF, Zheng JY (2014) A study on the intralaminar damage and interlaminar delamination of carbon fiber composite laminates under three-point bending using acoustic emission. J Fail Anal Prev 15:101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-014-9901-810.1007/s11668-014-9901-8 ↗
13. Triki E, Zouari B, Dammak F (2016) Dependence of the interlaminar fracture toughness of E-glass/polyester woven fabric composites laminates on ply orientation. Eng Fract Mech 159:63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.03.02510.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.03.025 ↗
14. Khashaba UA (2004) In-plane shear properties of cross-ply composite laminates with different off-axis angles. Compos Struct 65:167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2003.10.01210.1016/j.compstruct.2003.10.012 ↗
15. Khashaba UA, Sebaey TA, Alnefaie KA (2013) Failure and reliability analysis of pinned-joints composite laminates: effects of stacking sequences. Compos B Eng 45:1694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.09.06610.1016/j.compositesb.2012.09.066 ↗
16. Setoodeh S, Abdalla MM, Ijsselmuiden ST, Gürdal Z (2009) Design of variable-stiffness composite panels for maximum buckling load. Compos Struct 87:109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.01.00810.1016/j.compstruct.2008.01.008 ↗
17. Ho-Huu V, Do-Thi TD, Dang-Trung H, Vo-Duy T, Nguyen-Thoi T (2016) Optimization of laminated composite plates for maximizing buckling load using improved differential evolution and smoothed finite element method. Compos Struct 146:132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.03.01610.1016/j.compstruct.2016.03.016 ↗
18. Vo-Duy T, Ho-Huu V, Do-Thi TD, Dang-Trung H, Nguyen-Thoi T (2017) A global numerical approach for lightweight design optimization of laminated composite plates subjected to frequency constraints. Compos Struct 159:646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.09.05910.1016/j.compstruct.2016.09.059 ↗
19. Yalcinkaya MA, Sozer EM, Altan MC (2017) Fabrication of high quality composite laminates by pressurized and heated-VARTM. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 102:336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.08.01710.1016/j.compositesa.2017.08.017 ↗
20. Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials. ASTM Int. 1–11 (2002)
21. Standard test methods for flexural properties of unreinforced and reinforced plastics and electrical insulating materials. ASTM Int. 1–11 (2019)
22. Seo J, Kim Y, Kim DC, Park HW (2021) Numerical and experimental investigation of the delamination in drilling of the carbon fiber-reinforced plastic composite. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 112:2373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06452-x10.1007/s00170-020-06452-x ↗
23. Wolfram U, Gross T, Pahr DH, Schwiedrzik J, Wilke HJ, Zysset PK (2012) Fabric-based Tsai–Wu yield criteria for vertebral trabecular bone in stress and strain space. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 15:218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.07.00510.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.07.005 ↗
24. Groenwold AA, Haftka RT (2006) Optimization with non-homogeneous failure criteria like Tsai–Wu for composite laminates. Struct Multidiscip Optim 32:183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-006-0020-310.1007/s00158-006-0020-3 ↗
25. Chen X, Sun X, Chen P, Wang B, Gu J, Wang W, Chai Y, Zhao Y (2021) Rationalized improvement of Tsai–Wu failure criterion considering different failure modes of composite materials. Compos Struct 256:113120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11312010.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113120 ↗
26. Soden PD, Kaddour AS, Hinton MJ (2004) Recommendations for designers and researchers resulting from the world-wide failure exercise. Compos Sci Technol 64:589. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0266-3538(03)00228-810.1016/s0266-3538(03)00228-8 ↗
27. Li S, Sitnikova E, Liang Y, Kaddour AS (2017) The Tsai–Wu failure criterion rationalised in the context of UD composites. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 102:207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.08.00710.1016/j.compositesa.2017.08.007 ↗
28. Cui C, Dong J, Mao X (2019) Effect of braiding angle on progressive failure and fracture mechanism of 3-D five-directional carbon/epoxy braided composites under impact compression. Compos Struct 229:111412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11141210.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111412 ↗
29. Mollón V, Bonhomme J, Viña J, Argüelles A, Fernández-Canteli A (2012) Influence of the principal tensile stresses on delamination fracture mechanisms and their associated morphology for different loading modes in carbon/epoxy composites. Compos B Eng 43:1676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.07.01810.1016/j.compositesb.2011.07.018 ↗
30. Davidson P, Waas AM (2017) The effects of defects on the compressive response of thick carbon composites: an experimental and computational study. Compos Struct 176:582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.05.04610.1016/j.compstruct.2017.05.046 ↗
31. Laffan MJ, Pinho ST, Robinson P, Iannucci L, McMillan AJ (2012) Measurement of the fracture toughness associated with the longitudinal fibre compressive failure mode of laminated composites. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 43:1930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.04.00910.1016/j.compositesa.2012.04.009 ↗
32. Tay TE, Liu G, Yudhanto A, Tan VBC (2007) A micro–macro approach to modeling progressive damage in composite structures. Int J Damage Mech 17:5. https://doi.org/10.1177/105678950606794110.1177/1056789506067941 ↗
33. Louhghalam A, Arwade SR (2008) Prediction of incipient damage sites in composites using classifiers. Int J Damage Mech 19:233. https://doi.org/10.1177/105678950809661410.1177/1056789508096614 ↗
34. Campos KAd, Augusto J, Pereira TA, Hein LRdO (2012) 3-D reconstruction by extended depth-of-field in failure analysis—case study II: fractal analysis of interlaminar fracture in carbon/epoxy composites. Eng Fail Anal 25:271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2012.05.01510.1016/j.engfailanal.2012.05.015 ↗
35. Yuyuan T, Baozhong S, Bohong G (2010) Impact damage of 3D cellular woven composite from unit-cell level analysis. Int J Damage Mech 20:323. https://doi.org/10.1177/105678950935184310.1177/1056789509351843 ↗
36. Wei J, Wang H, Lin B, Sui T, Zhao F, Fang S (2019) Acoustic emission signal of fiber-reinforced composite grinding: frequency components and damage pattern recognition. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 103:1391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03645-x10.1007/s00170-019-03645-x ↗