Gene delivery using layer-by-layer functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes: design, characterization, cell line evaluation
Source abstract
Abstract
Multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) with special nanoneedle structure have emerged as new promising candidates for plasmid and drug delivery. However, the delivery is greatly limited by the high tendency of CNT to form aggregates, the “less dispersion problem,” and CNT cytotoxicity. Here, we described an extensive evaluation of the ability of layer-by-layer modification strategy to reduce CNT size and toxicity, and to shield CNT hydrophobic surfaces. The MWCNTs can be derivatized with carboxylate groups (cMWCNT) and sequentially functionalized with protein, cationic polyethylenimine (PEI), and polysaccharide. The protein coating, characterized by Fourier transform infrared and deconvolution methods, could serve as the hydrophilic, biocompatible matrix and scaffold for sequential conjugation. We found that coated PEI-enhanced electrostatic interactions between plasmid DNA and CNTs. The functionalized cMWCNTs were analyzed by thermogravimetric analysis, dynamic light scattering, and electron microscopy technologies. The conjugation of cMWCNTs–ovalbumin–PEI with oxidized pectin further promoted green fluorescence intensity by balancing the intracellular DNA release and were easier to disperse. Our in-depth study demonstrated that functionalized CNTs can be improved by fine-tuned process parameters of the protein–PEI–polysaccharide modification.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications · Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Chen X, Zhang Q, Li J, Yang M, Zhao N, Xu FJ (2018) Rattle-structured rough nanocapsules with in-situ-formed gold nanorod cores for complementary gene/chemo/photothermal therapy. ACS Nano 12:5646–5656. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.8b0144010.1021/acsnano.8b01440 ↗
2. Zhao N, Fan W, Zhao X et al (2020) Polycation-carbon nanohybrids with superior rough hollow morphology for the NIR-II responsive multimodal therapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 12:11341–11352. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b2237310.1021/acsami.9b22373 ↗
3. Feng L, Yang X, Shi X et al (2013) Polyethylene glycol and polyethylenimine dual-functionalized nano-graphene oxide for photothermally enhanced gene delivery. Small 9:1989–1997. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20120253810.1002/smll.201202538 ↗
4. Naldini L (2015) Gene therapy returns to centre stage. Nature 526:351–360. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature1581810.1038/nature15818 ↗
5. Ibraheem D, Elaissari A, Fessi H (2014) Gene therapy and DNA delivery systems. Int J Pharm 459:70–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.11.04110.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.11.041 ↗
6. Taghavi S, Abnous K, Taghdisi SM, Ramezani M, Alibolandi M (2020) Hybrid carbon-based materials for gene delivery in cancer therapy. J Control Release 318:158–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.12.03010.1016/j.jconrel.2019.12.030 ↗
7. de Menezes BRC, Rodrigues KF, da Silva Fonseca BC, Ribas RG, do Amaral montanheiroThim TLGP (2019) Recent advances in the use of carbon nanotubes as smart biomaterials. J Mater Chem B 7:1343–1360. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8TB02419G10.1039/C8TB02419G ↗
8. Hu Y, Liu S, Li X et al (2018) Facile preparation of biocompatible poly(l-lactic acid)-modified halloysite nanotubes/poly(ε-caprolactone) porous scaffolds by solvent evaporation of Pickering emulsion templates. J Mater Sci 53:14774–14788. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2588-610.1007/s10853-018-2588-6 ↗
9. Liu H, Wang ZG, Liu SL et al (2019) Intracellular pathway of halloysite nanotubes: potential application for antitumor drug delivery. J Mater Sci 54:693–704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2775-510.1007/s10853-018-2775-5 ↗
10. Nasari M, Semnani D, Hadjianfar M, Amanpour S (2020) Poly (ε-caprolactone)/poly (N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone) core–shell nanofibers loaded by multi-walled carbon nanotubes and 5-fluorouracil: an anticancer drug delivery system. J Mater Sci 55:10185–10201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-04784-310.1007/s10853-020-04784-3 ↗
11. Bates K, Kostarelos K (2013) Carbon nanotubes as vectors for gene therapy: Past achievements, present challenges and future goals. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 65:2023–2033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2013.10.00310.1016/j.addr.2013.10.003 ↗
12. Alshehri R, Ilyas AM, Hasan A, Arnaout A, Ahmed F, Memic A (2016) Carbon nanotubes in biomedical applications: factors, mechanisms, and remedies of toxicity. J Med Chem 59:8149–8167. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b0177010.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01770 ↗
13. Nunes A, Amsharov N, Guo C et al (2010) Hybrid polymer-grafted multiwalled carbon nanotubes for in vitro gene delivery. Small 6:2281–2291. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20100086410.1002/smll.201000864 ↗
14. Liu YZ, Ma D et al (2013) Biocompatible multi-walled carbon nanotube-chitosan-folic acid nanoparticle hybrids as GFP gene delivery materials. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 111:224–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.06.01010.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.06.010 ↗
15. Saito N, Haniu H, Usui Y et al (2014) Safe clinical use of carbon nanotubes as innovative biomaterials. Chem Rev 114:6040–6079. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr400341h10.1021/cr400341h ↗
16. Katouzian I, Jafari SM (2019) Protein nanotubes as state-of-the-art nanocarriers: Synthesis methods, simulation and applications. J Control Release 303:302–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.04.02610.1016/j.jconrel.2019.04.026 ↗
17. Pantarotto D, Singh R, McCarthy D et al (2004) Functionalized carbon nanotubes for plasmid DNA gene delivery. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 43:5242–5246. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20046043710.1002/anie.200460437 ↗
18. Podesta JE, Al-Jamal KT, Herrero MA et al (2009) Antitumor activity and prolonged survival by carbon-nanotube-mediated therapeutic siRNA silencing in a human lung xenograft model. Small 5:1176–1185. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20080157210.1002/smll.200801572 ↗
19. Munk M, De Souza Salomão Zanette R, De Almeida Camargo LS et al (2017) Using carbon nanotubes to deliver genes to hard-to-transfect mammalian primary fibroblast cells. Biomed Phys Eng Express 3:045002. https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/aa792710.1088/2057-1976/aa7927 ↗
20. Naqash F, Masoodi FA, Rather SA, Wani SM, Gani A (2017) Emerging concepts in the nutraceutical and functional properties of pectin—a review. Carbohydr Polym 168:227–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.03.05810.1016/j.carbpol.2017.03.058 ↗
21. Li A, Wu B, Mu C, Lin W (2011) Concomitant degradation in periodate oxidation of carboxymethyl cellulose. Carbohydr Polym 84:881–886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.12.02610.1016/j.carbpol.2010.12.026 ↗
22. Hu Q, Luo Y (2018) Recent advances of polysaccharide-based nanoparticles for oral insulin delivery. Int J Biol Macromol 120:775–782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.08.15210.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.08.152 ↗
23. Singh A, Hua Hsu M, Gupta N et al (2020) Derivatized carbon nanotubes for gene therapy in mammalian and plant cells. ChemPlusChem 85:466–475. https://doi.org/10.1002/cplu.20190067810.1002/cplu.201900678 ↗
24. Celik E, Liu L, Choi H (2011) Protein fouling behavior of carbon nanotube/polyethersulfone composite membranes during water filtration. Water Res 45:5287–5294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2011.07.03610.1016/j.watres.2011.07.036 ↗
25. Benjaminsen RV, Mattebjerg MA, Henriksen JR, Moghimi SM, Andresen TL (2013) The possible “proton sponge” effect of polyethylenimine (PEI) does not include change in lysosomal pH. Mol. Ther 21:149–157. https://doi.org/10.1038/mt.2012.18510.1038/mt.2012.185 ↗
26. Nepal D, Geckeler KE (2007) Proteins and carbon nanotubes: close encounter in water. Small 3:1259–1265. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20060051110.1002/smll.200600511 ↗
27. Zhang T, Song X, Kang D et al (2015) Modified bovine serum albumin as an effective charge-reversal platform for simultaneously improving the transfection efficiency and biocompatibility of polyplexes. J Mater Chem B 3:4698–4706. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TB00548E10.1039/C5TB00548E ↗
28. Zeinabad HA, Zarrabian A, Saboury AA, Alizadeh AM, Falahati M (2016) Interaction of single and multi wall carbon nanotubes with the biological systems: tau protein and PC12 cells as targets. Sci Rep 6:26508. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep2650810.1038/srep26508 ↗
29. Hashida Y, Umeyama T, Mihara J et al (2012) Development of a novel composite material with carbon nanotubes assisted by self-assembled peptides designed in conjunction with beta-sheet formation. J Pharm Sci 101:3398–3418. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.2314410.1002/jps.23144 ↗
30. Kumari M, Liu C-H, Wu W-C (2018) Protein moiety in oligochitosan modified vector regulates internalization mechanism and gene delivery: polyplex characterization, intracellular trafficking and transfection. Carbohydr Polym 202:143–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.08.13110.1016/j.carbpol.2018.08.131 ↗
31. Yang M, Meng J, Mao X et al (2010) Carbon nanotubes induce secondary structure changes of bovine albumin in aqueous phase. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 10:7550–7553. https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2010.282510.1166/jnn.2010.2825 ↗
32. Krimm S, Bandekar J (1986) Vibrational spectroscopy and conformation of peptides, polypeptides, and proteins. In: Anfinsen CB, Edsall JT, Richards FM (eds) Advances in Protein Chemistry. Academic Press, Cambridge
33. Chetouani A, Elkolli M, Bounekhel M, Benachour D (2017) Chitosan/oxidized pectin/PVA blend film: mechanical and biological properties. Polym Bull 74:4297–4310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-017-1953-y10.1007/s00289-017-1953-y ↗
34. Caoduro C, Kacem R, Boukari K et al (2016) Carbon nanotube-Protamine hybrid: evaluation of DNA cell penetration. Carbon 96:742–752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2015.09.09810.1016/j.carbon.2015.09.098 ↗
35. Jiang HL, Kwon JT, Kim YK et al (2007) Galactosylated chitosan-graft-polyethylenimine as a gene carrier for hepatocyte targeting. Gene Ther 14:1389–1398. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.gt.330299710.1038/sj.gt.3302997 ↗
36. Zintchenko A, Philipp A, Dehshahri A, Wagner E (2008) Simple modifications of branched PEI lead to highly efficient siRNA carriers with low toxicity. Bioconjug Chem 19:1448–1455. https://doi.org/10.1021/bc800065f10.1021/bc800065f ↗
37. Rezaee M, Gholami L, Gildeh MS, Ramezani M, Kazemi Oskuee R (2019) Charge reduction: an efficient strategy to reduce toxicity and increase the transfection efficiency of high molecular weight polyethylenimine. J Pharm Investig 49:105–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40005-018-0388-210.1007/s40005-018-0388-2 ↗
38. Liu L, Fishman ML, Kost J, Hicks KB (2003) Pectin-based systems for colon-specific drug delivery via oral route. Biomaterials 24:3333–3343. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00213-810.1016/S0142-9612(03)00213-8 ↗
39. Salatin S, Yarikhosroushahi A (2017) Overviews on the cellular uptake mechanism of polysaccharide colloidal nanoparticles. J Cell Mol Med 21:1668–1686. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.1311010.1111/jcmm.13110 ↗
40. Katav T, Liu L, Traitel T, Goldbart R, Wolfson M, Kost J (2008) Modified pectin-based carrier for gene delivery: cellular barriers in gene delivery course. J Control Release 130:183–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2008.06.00210.1016/j.jconrel.2008.06.002 ↗
41. Varkouhi AK, Foillard S, Lammers T et al (2011) SiRNA delivery with functionalized carbon nanotubes. Int J Pharm 416:419–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.02.00910.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.02.009 ↗
42. Kostarelos K, Lacerda L, Pastorin G et al (2007) Cellular uptake of functionalized carbon nanotubes is independent of functional group and cell type. Nat Nanotechnol 2:108–113. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2006.20910.1038/nnano.2006.209 ↗
43. Ravelli D, Merli D, Quartarone E, Profumo A, Mustarelli P, Fagnoni M (2013) PEGylated carbon nanotubes: preparation, properties and applications. RSC Adv 3:13569–13582. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RA40852C10.1039/C3RA40852C ↗
44. Rejman J, Oberle V, Zuhorn IS, Hoekstra D (2004) Size-dependent internalization of particles via the pathways of clathrin- and caveolae-mediated endocytosis. Biochem J 377:159–169. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj2003125310.1042/bj20031253 ↗
45. Nia AH, Eshghi H, Abnous K, Ramezani M (2017) The intracellular delivery of plasmid DNA using cationic reducible carbon nanotube—Disulfide conjugates of polyethylenimine European. J Pharm Sci 100:176–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2017.01.01410.1016/j.ejps.2017.01.014 ↗
46. Kong F, Liu F, Li W et al (2016) Smart carbon nanotubes with laser-controlled behavior in gene delivery and therapy through a non-digestive trafficking pathway. Small 12:6753–6766. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20160109210.1002/smll.201601092 ↗
47. Behnam B, Shier WT, Nia AH, Abnous K, Ramezani M (2013) Non-covalent functionalization of single-walled carbon nanotubes with modified polyethyleneimines for efficient gene delivery. Int J Pharm 454:204–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.06.05710.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.06.057 ↗
48. Hu F, Li Y, Wang Q et al (2020) Carbon nanotube-based DNA vaccine against koi herpesvirus given by intramuscular injection. Fish Shellfish Immunol 98:810–818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2019.11.03510.1016/j.fsi.2019.11.035 ↗
49. Ohta T, Hashida Y, Higuchi Y, Yamashita F, Hashida M (2017) Vitro cellular gene delivery employing a novel composite material of single-walled carbon nanotubes associated with designed peptides with pegylation. J Pharm Sci 106:792–802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xphs.2016.10.02510.1016/j.xphs.2016.10.025 ↗
50. Ahmed M, Jiang X, Deng Z, Narain R (2009) Cationic glyco-functionalized single-walled carbon nanotubes as efficient gene delivery vehicles. Bioconjug Chem 20:2017–2022. https://doi.org/10.1021/bc900229v10.1021/bc900229v ↗