Synthesis of CeO2-modified activated carbon spheres by grafting and coordinating reactions for elemental mercury removal
Source abstract
Abstract
Series of resin-based activated carbon spheres with well-dispersed CeO2 particles inside and high surface area were successfully prepared by the grafting of MMA and coordinating reactions of cerium(III) nitrate salt and steam activation. N2 adsorption isotherms, scanning electron microscopy, energy-dispersive spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction-meter and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy were applied to study the textural and surface characteristics of the obtained activated carbon spheres, and the Hg0 removal performances were evaluated in a fixed bed reactor. The experimental results indicated that pore structure, surface chemical properties and Hg0 removal ability of activated carbon spheres were observably improved after the modification of grafting and coordinating reactions. The optimal cerium(III) nitrate loading value, reaction temperature and O2 content were 7%, 150 °C and 5%, respectively. Moreover, SO2 showed an obvious inhibitory effect on the Hg0 removal efficiency in the absence of O2, while it facilitated the Hg0 removal in the presence of O2. Nitrogen monoxide promoted the Hg0 removal with or without O2, while water vapor inhibited the Hg0 removal over ACS-M-7%Ce. In addition, both of stable removal performance and excellent recycling ability were shown for ACS-M-7%Ce in ten cycles. The Hg0 removal mechanism analysis indicated that introduced CeO2 significantly promoted the Hg0 removal ability of ACS-M-7%Ce by generating the active species (such as C=O or C–O) and the lattice oxygen through the Ce4+/Ce3+ redox couple, and catalytically oxidized Hg0 into HgO.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mercury impact and mitigation studies · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (59)
Show source-provided references
1. Gaffney JS, Marley N (2014) In-depth review of atmospheric mercury: sources, transformations, and potential sinks. Inter J Nanomed 9:1883–1889
2. Xu W, Adewuyi YG, Liu YX et al (2018) Removal of elemental mercury from flue gas using CuOx and CeO2 modified rice straw chars enhanced by ultrasound. Fuel Process Technol 170:21–3110.1016/j.fuproc.2017.10.017 ↗
3. Xie YE, Li CT, Zhao LK et al (2015) Experimental study on Hg0 removal from flue gas over columnar MnOx–CeO2/activated coke. Appl Surf Sci 333:59–6710.1016/j.apsusc.2015.01.234 ↗
4. Liu YX, Wang Q, Pan JF et al (2015) A study on removal of elemental mercury in flue gas using fenton solution. J Hazard Mater 292:164–17210.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.03.027 ↗
5. Wang SX, Zhang L, Zhao B et al (2012) Mitigation potential of mercury emission form coal-fired power plants in China. Energy Fuels 26:4635–464210.1021/ef201990x ↗
6. Driscoll CT, Mason RP, Chan HM et al (2013) Mercury as a global pollutant: sources, pathways, and effects. Environ Sci Technol 47:4967–498310.1021/es305071v ↗
7. Zhao B, Yi HH, Tang XL et al (2016) Copper modified activated coke for mercury removal from coal-fired flue gas. Chem Eng J 286:585–59310.1016/j.cej.2015.10.107 ↗
8. Wang FY, Wang SX, Zhang L et al (2016) Characteristics of mercury cycling in the cement production process. J Hazard Mater 302:27–3510.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.09.042 ↗
9. Li GL, Shen BX, Wang SJ et al (2015) Comparative study of elemental mercury removal by three bio-chars from various solid wastes. Fuel 145:189–19510.1016/j.fuel.2014.12.083 ↗
10. He C, Shen BX, Chen JH et al (2014) Adsorption and oxidation of elemental mercury over Ce–MnOx/Ti-PILCs. Environ Sci Technol 48:7891–789810.1021/es5007719 ↗
11. Li GL, Shen BX, Li BX et al (2015) Elemental mercury removal using biochar pyrolyzed from municipal solid waste. Fuel Process Technol 133:43–5010.1016/j.fuproc.2014.12.042 ↗
12. Zhang YS, Duan W, Liu Z et al (2014) Effects of modified fly ash on mercury adsorption ability in an entrained-flow reactor. Fuel 128:274–28010.1016/j.fuel.2014.03.009 ↗
13. Wu H, Liu H, Wang QH et al (2013) Experimental study of homogeneous mercury oxidation under O2/CO2 atmosphere. Proc Combust Inst 34:2847–285410.1016/j.proci.2012.06.125 ↗
14. Guo YF, Yan NQ, Yang SJ et al (2012) Conversion of elemental mercury with a novel membrane catalytic system at low temperature. J Hazard Mater 213–214:62–7010.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.01.048 ↗
15. Zhao Y, Hao RL, Zhang P et al (2014) An integrative process for Hg0 removal using vaporized H2O2/Na2S2O8. Fuel 13:113–12110.1016/j.fuel.2014.07.046 ↗
16. Yang S, Zhang JY, Zhao YC et al (2010) Pre-investigation of nanostructured TiO2-activated carbon composites for photocatalytic oxidation removal of mercury vapor. J Eng Thermophys 31:339–342
17. Wang JC, Zhang YP, Han L et al (2013) Simultaneous removal of hydrogen sulfide and mercury from simulated syngas by iron-based sorbents. Fuel 103:73–7910.1016/j.fuel.2011.10.056 ↗
18. Pavlish JH, Hamre LL, Zhuang Y (2010) Mercury control technologies for coal combustion and gasification systems. Fuel 89:838–84710.1016/j.fuel.2009.05.021 ↗
19. Xu WQ, Wang HR, Zhu TY et al (2013) Mercury removal from coal combustion flue gas by modified fly ash. J Environ Sc 25:393–39810.1016/S1001-0742(12)60065-5 ↗
20. Mullett M, Pendleto P, Badalyan A (2012) Removal of elemental mercury from Bayer stack gases using sulfur-impregnated activated carbons. Chem Eng J 211:133–14210.1016/j.cej.2012.09.098 ↗
21. Lee SJ, Seo Y, Lee TG (2004) Removal of gas-phase elemental mercury by iodine and chlorine-impregnated activated carbons. Atmos Environ 38:4887–489310.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.05.043 ↗
22. Mei Z, Shen Z, Zhao Q et al (2008) Removal and recovery of gas-phase mercury by metal oxide-loaded activated carbon. J Hazard Mater 152:721–72910.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.07.038 ↗
23. Yang S, Guo Y, Yan N et al (2011) Capture of gaseous elemental mercury from flue gas using a magnetic and sulfur poisoning resistant sorbent Mn/γ-Fe2O3 at lower temperatures. J Hazard Mater 186:508–51510.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.11.034 ↗
24. Zhou J, Hou W, Qi P et al (2013) CeO2–TiO2 sorbents for the removal of elemental mercury from syngas. Environ Sci Technol 47:10056–1006210.1021/es401681y ↗
25. Tian L, Li C, Li Q, Zeng G, Gao Z, Li S, Fan X (2009) Removal of elemental mercury by activated carbon impregnated with CeO2. Fuel 88:1687–169110.1016/j.fuel.2009.01.022 ↗
26. Fan X, Li C, Zeng G, Gao Z, Chen L, Zhang W, Gao H (2010) Removal of gas-phase element mercury by activated carbon fiber impregnated with CeO2. Energy Fuels 24:4250–425410.1021/ef100377f ↗
27. Hua XY, Zhou JS, Li Q, Luo ZY, Cen KF (2010) Gas-phase elemental mercury removal by CeO2 impregnated activated coke. Energy Fuels 24:5426–543110.1021/ef100554t ↗
28. Tao SS, Li CT, Fan XP et al (2012) Activated coke impregnated with cerium chloride used for elemental mercury removal from simulated flue gas. Chem Eng J 210:547–55610.1016/j.cej.2012.09.028 ↗
29. Zhang CM, Song W, Sun GH et al (2014) Synthesis, characterization, and evaluation of activated carbon spheres for removal of dibenzothiophene from model diesel fuel. Ind Eng Chem 53:4271–427610.1021/ie403773f ↗
30. Romero-Anaya AJ, Lillo-Ródenas MA, Linares-Solano A (2014) Activation of a spherical carbon for toluene adsorption at low concentration. Carbon 77:616–62610.1016/j.carbon.2014.05.066 ↗
31. Ludwinowicz J, Jaroniec M (2015) Potassium salt-assisted synthesis of highly microporous carbon spheres for CO2 adsorption. Carbon 82:297–30310.1016/j.carbon.2014.10.074 ↗
32. Zhang CM, Song W, Zhang XC et al (2018) Synthesis, characterization and evaluation of resin-based carbon spheres modified by oxygen functional groups for gaseous elemental mercury capture. J Mater Sci 53:9429–9448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2231-610.1007/s10853-018-2231-6 ↗
33. Li YQ, Li KX (2011) Synthesis and characterization of mesoporous carbon with narrow pore size distribution derived from rare earth–macromolecule complexes. J Appl Polym Sci 121:3466–347410.1002/app.34010 ↗
34. Oya A, Kimura M, Sugo T et al (1994) Antibacterial activated carbon fiber derived from methyl methacrylate-grafted phenolic resin fiber. Carbon 32:107–11010.1016/0008-6223(94)90015-9 ↗
35. Zhao S, Xu HM, Mei J et al (2017) Ag–Mo modified SCR catalyst for a co-beneficial oxidation of elemental mercury at wide temperature range. Fuel 200:236–24310.1016/j.fuel.2017.03.034 ↗
36. Shen W, Zheng J, Qin Z, Wang J (2003) Preparation of mesoporous carbon from commercial activated carbon with steam activation in the presence of cerium oxide. J Colloid Interface Sci 264:467–47310.1016/S0021-9797(03)00376-X ↗
37. Zhang CM, Song W, Sun GH, Xie LJ, Wang JL et al (2013) CO2 capture with activated carbon grafted by nitrogenous functional groups. Energy Fuels 27:4818–482310.1021/ef400499k ↗
38. Shi DL, Lu Y, Tang Z et al (2014) Removal of elemental mercury from simulated flue gas by cerium oxide modified attapulgite. Korean J Chem Eng 31:1405–141210.1007/s11814-014-0074-7 ↗
39. Sharma RK, Wooten JB, Baliga VL et al (2004) Characterization of chars from pyrolysis of lignin. Fuel 83:1469–148210.1016/j.fuel.2003.11.015 ↗
40. Choma J, Jedynak K, Fahrenholz W et al (2014) Microporosity development in phenolic resin-based mesoporous carbons for enhancing CO2 adsorption at ambient conditions. Appl Surf Sci 289:592–60010.1016/j.apsusc.2013.11.051 ↗
41. Chen SX, Chen JL, Qing WU (2006) Chemical structure modification of activated carbon fibers by cerous nitrate. New Carbon Mater 21:206–212
42. Wu J, Zhao Z, Huang TF et al (2017) Removal of elemental mercury by Ce–Mn co-modified activated carbon catalyst. Catal Commun 93:62–6610.1016/j.catcom.2017.01.016 ↗
43. Miguel SRD, Vilella JI, Jablonski EL et al (2002) Preparation of Pt catalysts supported on activated carbon felts (ACF). Appl Catal A-Gen 232:237–24610.1016/S0926-860X(02)00112-6 ↗
44. Serrano-Ruiz JC, Ramos-Fernández EV, Silvestre-Albero J et al (2008) Preparation and characterization of CeO2 highly dispersed on activated carbon. Mater Res Bull 43:1850–185710.1016/j.materresbull.2007.07.001 ↗
45. Fallya F, Perrichona V, Vidal H et al (2000) Modification of the oxygen storage capacity of CeO2–ZrO2 mixed oxides after redox cycling aging. Catal Today 59:373–38610.1016/S0920-5861(00)00302-3 ↗
46. Li GL, Shen BX, Li YW, Zhao B, Wang FM, He C, Zhang M (2015) Removal of element mercury by medicine residue derived biochars in presence of various gas compositions. J Hazard Mater 298:162–16910.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.05.031 ↗
47. Shen BX, Tian LH, Li FK et al (2017) Elemental mercury removal by the modified bio-char from waste tea. Fuel 272:28–37
48. Jun Z, Duan YF, Zhou Q et al (2016) Adsorptive removal of gas-phase mercury by oxygen non-thermal plasma modified activated carbon. Chem Eng J 294:281–28910.1016/j.cej.2016.02.002 ↗
49. Yang W, Liu YX, Wang Q, Pan JF (2017) Removal of elemental mercury from flue gas using straw chars modified by Mn–Ce mixed oxides with ultrasonic-assisted impregnation. Chem Eng J 326:169–18110.1016/j.cej.2017.05.106 ↗
50. Liu J, Qu W, Joo SW, Zheng C (2012) Effect of SO2 on mercury binding on carbonaceous surfaces. Chem Eng J 184:163–16710.1016/j.cej.2012.01.023 ↗
51. Li H, Wu CY, Li Y et al (2011) CeO2–TiO2 catalysts for catalytic oxidation of elemental mercury in low-rank coal combustion flue gas. Environ Sci Technol 45:7394–740010.1021/es2007808 ↗
52. Qu Z, Xie JK, Xu HM et al (2015) Regenerable sorbent with a high capacity for elemental mercury removal and recycling from the simulated flue gas at a low temperature. Energy Fuel 29:6187–619610.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b00868 ↗
53. Liu J, Cheney MA, Wu F et al (2011) Effects of chemical functional groups on elemental mercury adsorption on carbonaceous surfaces. J Hazard Mater 186:108–11310.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.10.089 ↗
54. Xu HM, Jia JP, Guo YF et al (2018) Design of 3D MnO2/carbon sphere composite for the catalytic oxidation and adsorption of elemental mercury. J Hazard Mater 342:69–7610.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.08.011 ↗
55. Tan Z, Sun L, Xiang J et al (2012) Gas-phase elemental mercury removal by novel carbon-based sorbents. Carbon 50:362–37110.1016/j.carbon.2011.08.036 ↗
56. Zhu X, Gu J, Wang Y et al (2014) Inherent anchorages in UiO-66 nanoparticles for efficient capture of alendronate and its mediated release. Chem Commun 50:8779–878210.1039/C4CC02570A ↗
57. Wan Q, Duan L, He KB, Li JH (2011) Removal of gaseous elemental mercury over a CeO2–WO3/TiO2 nanocomposite in simulated coal-fired flue gas. Chem Eng J 170:512–51710.1016/j.cej.2010.11.060 ↗
58. Reddy BM, Khan A, Yamada Y, Kobayashi T, Loridant S, Volta JC (2003) Structural characterization of CeO2–TiO2 and V2O5/CeO2–TiO2 catalysts by Raman and XPS techniques. J Phys Chem B 107:5162–516710.1021/jp0344601 ↗
59. Zhao LK, Li CT, Zhang J et al (2015) Promotional effect of CeO2 modified support on V2O5–WO3/TiO2 catalyst for ele- mental mercury oxidation in simulated coal-fired flue gas. Fuel 153:361–36910.1016/j.fuel.2015.03.001 ↗