Stiffness variability analysis of maize fiber bundles via multiscale simulation
Source abstract
Abstract
The objective of this study was to analyze the stiffness variation of maize fiber bundles. Tensile modulus of fiber bundle was calculated by using a multiscale simulation. Fiber bundle cross section was reconstructed by the skeletonization method. The influences of the cell wall thickness, the microfibril angle (MFA) in S2 layer and the fiber diameter on the tensile modulus of retted maize bundles were determined. Numerical results showed that the MFA in S2 layer and the cell wall thickness in vascular bundle sheath (VBS) are the main factors affecting the tensile stiffness of maize bundle. When fiber diameter is fixed, the large variation of tensile modulus is attributed to the small MFA in S2 layer and the big difference in cell wall thickness of VBS. For fiber bundles in the skin group, the decreased tendency of tensile modulus is attributed to the decreased density of VBS when fiber diameter increases. However, for fiber bundles in the core group, the combined effects of decreased density of VBS and increased area ratio of Sv (transverse sectional area occupied by vessels and phloem tissue in fiber bundle) contribute more than 60% to the decreased tensile modulus. Compared to the increased area ratio of Sv, the decreased density of VBS exerts a greater influence on the decrease in stiffness. These findings can enhance our understanding of the large variation of natural fiber stiffness.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Textile materials and evaluations · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Rao KMM, Rao KM (2007) Extraction and tensile properties of natural fibers: Vakka, date and bamboo. Compos Struct 77:288–29510.1016/j.compstruct.2005.07.023 ↗
2. Munawar SS, Umemura K, Kawai S (2007) Characterization of the morphological, physical, and mechanical properties of seven nonwood plant fiber bundles. J Wood Sci 53:108–11310.1007/s10086-006-0836-x ↗
3. Joshi SV, Drzal LT, Mohanty AK, Arora S (2004) Are natural fiber composites environmentally superior to glass fiber reinforced composites? Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 35:371–37610.1016/j.compositesa.2003.09.016 ↗
4. Puglia D, Biagiotti J, Kenny JM (2005) A review on natural fibre-based composites—part II: application of natural reinforcements in composite materials for automotive industry. J Nat Fibers 1:23–6510.1300/J395v01n03_03 ↗
5. Cheung H-Y, Ho M-P, Lau K-T, Cardona F, Hui D (2009) Natural fibre-reinforced composites for bioengineering and environmental engineering applications. Compos B Eng 40:655–66310.1016/j.compositesb.2009.04.014 ↗
6. Gibson LJ (2012) The hierarchical structure and mechanics of plant materials. J R Soc Interface 9:2749–276610.1098/rsif.2012.0341 ↗
7. Charlet K, Baley C, Morvan C, Jernot JP, Gomina M, Bréard J (2007) Characteristics of Hermès flax fibres as a function of their location in the stem and properties of the derived unidirectional composites. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 38:1912–192110.1016/j.compositesa.2007.03.006 ↗
8. Liu W, Huang J, Wang N, Lei S (2015) The influence of moisture content on the interfacial properties of natural palm fiber–matrix composite. Wood Sci Technol 49:371–38710.1007/s00226-015-0702-3 ↗
9. Zhai S, Li D, Pan B, Sugiyama J, Itoh T (2012) Tensile strength of windmill palm (Trachycarpus fortunei) fiber bundles and its structural implications. J Mater Sci 47:949–959. doi: 10.1007/s10853-011-5874-010.1007/s10853-011-5874-0 ↗
10. Zhai S, Imai T, Horikawa Y, Sugiyama J (2013) Anatomical and mechanical characteristics of leaf-sheath fibrovascular bundles in palms. IAWA J 34:285–30010.1163/22941932-00000024 ↗
11. Béakou A, Ntenga R (2011) Structure, morphology and mechanical properties of Rhectophyllum camerunense (RC) plant fiber. Part II: computational homogenization of the anisotropic elastic properties. Comput Mater Sci 50:1550–155810.1016/j.commatsci.2010.12.013 ↗
12. Sun Z, Zhao X, Wang X, Ma J (2014) Multiscale modeling of the elastic properties of natural fibers based on a generalized method of cells and laminate analogy approach. Cellulose 21:1135–114110.1007/s10570-014-0201-y ↗
13. Thuault A, Bazin J, Eve S, Breard J, Gomina M (2013) Numerical study of the influence of structural and mechanical parameters on the tensile mechanical behaviour of flax fibres. J Ind Text 44:22–3910.1177/1528083713481835 ↗
14. Wang N, Liu W, Huang J, Ma K (2014) The structure–mechanical relationship of palm vascular tissue. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 36:1–1110.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.04.001 ↗
15. Astley RJ, Harrington JJ, Stol KA (1997) Mechanical modelling of wood microstructure, an engineering approach. IPENZ Trans 24:21–29
16. Qing H, Mishnaevsky L (2009) 3D hierarchical computational model of wood as a cellular material with fibril reinforced, heterogeneous multiple layers. Mech Mater 41:1034–104910.1016/j.mechmat.2009.04.011 ↗
17. Faisal TR, Hristozov N, Western TL, Rey AD, Pasini D (2014) Computational study of the elastic properties of Rheum rhabarbarum tissues via surrogate models of tissue geometry. J Struct Biol 185:285–29410.1016/j.jsb.2014.01.012 ↗
18. Reddy N, Yang Y (2005) Structure and properties of high quality natural cellulose fibers from cornstalks. Polymer 46:5494–550010.1016/j.polymer.2005.04.073 ↗
19. Kálmán G, Recseg K, Gáspár M, Réczey K (2006) Novel approach of corn fiber utilization. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 131:738–75010.1385/ABAB:131:1:738 ↗
20. Huang J, Liu W, Zhou F, Peng Y, Wang N (2016) Mechanical properties of maize fibre bundles and their contribution to lodging resistance. Biosyst Eng 151:298–30710.1016/j.biosystemseng.2016.09.016 ↗
21. Sakaguchi J, Fukuda H (2008) Cell differentiation in the longitudinal veins and formation of commissural veins in rice (Oryza sativa) and maize (Zea mays). J Plant Res 121:593–60210.1007/s10265-008-0189-1 ↗
22. Faisal TR, Hristozov N, Rey AD, Western TL, Pasini D (2012) Experimental determination of Philodendron melinonii and Arabidopsis thaliana tissue microstructure and geometric modeling via finite-edge centroidal Voronoi tessellation. Phys Rev E: Stat Nonlinear Soft Matter Phys 86:03192110.1103/PhysRevE.86.031921 ↗
23. Horbens M, Branke D, Gartner R, Voigt A, Stenger F, Neinhuis C (2015) Multi-scale simulation of plant stem reinforcement by brachysclereids: a case study in apple fruit peduncles. J Struct Biol 192:116–12610.1016/j.jsb.2015.08.002 ↗
24. Magistris FD, Salmén L (2008) Finite element modelling of wood cell deformation transverse to the fibre axis. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 23:240–24610.3183/NPPRJ-2008-23-02-p240-246 ↗
25. Cousins WJ (1976) Elastic modulus of lignin as related to moisture content. Wood Sci Technol 10:9–1710.1007/BF00376380 ↗
26. Cousins WJ (1978) Young’s modulus of hemicellulose as related to moisture content. Wood Sci Technol 12:161–16710.1007/BF00372862 ↗
27. Halpin JC, Kardos JL (1976) The Halpin–Tsai equations: a review. Polym Eng Sci 16:344–35210.1002/pen.760160512 ↗
28. Muzamal M, Gamstedt EK, Rasmuson A (2014) Modeling wood fiber deformation caused by vapor expansion during steam explosion of wood. Wood Sci Technol 48:353–37210.1007/s00226-013-0613-0 ↗
29. Ding S-Y, Zhao S, Zeng Y (2013) Size, shape, and arrangement of native cellulose fibrils in maize cell walls. Cellulose 21:863–87110.1007/s10570-013-0147-5 ↗
30. Madison (2010) Wood handbook—wood as an engineering material. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Wisconsin