journal article·2017-05Open access

Self-accommodated and pre-strained martensitic microstructure in single-crystalline, metamagnetic Ni–Mn–Sn Heusler alloy

P. Czaja, R. Chulist, M. Szlezynger, W. Skuza, Y. I. Chumlyakov, M. J. Szczerba

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 52· Issue 10

Abstract

Metamagnetic shape memory alloys are a unique class of materials capable of large magnetic field-induced strain due to reverse martensitic phase transformation. A precondition for large shape change is martensite deformation, which heavily depends on microstructure. Elucidation of microstructure is therefore indispensable for strain control and deformation mechanics in such systems. The current paper reports on a self-accommodated martensitic microstructure in metamagnetic Ni50Mn37.5Sn12.5 single crystal. The microstructure here is hierarchically organised at three distinct levels. On a large scale, martensite plate colonies, distinguished by intercolony boundaries, group individual martensitic plates. Plates are separated by interplate boundaries and deviate by 2.2° from an ideal twin relation. On the lower scale, plates are composed of subplate twins. Conjugation boundaries separating two pairs of twins arise in relation to a subplate microstructure. Modulation boundaries separating two variants with perpendicular modulation directions and with parallel c-axes also appear. Mechanical training frees larger plates from fine subplate microtwins bringing macro-lamellae into twin relation, what then permits further detwinning until a single variant state.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Shape Memory Alloy Transformations · Creativity in Education and Neuroscience

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. Kainuma R, Imano Y, Ito W, Sutou Y, Morito H, Okamoto S, Kitakami O, Oikawa K, Fujita A, Kanomata T, Ishida K (2006) Magnetic-field-induced shape recovery by reverse phase transformation. Nat Lett 439:957–96010.1038/nature04493 ↗
2. Khan M, Pathak AK, Paudel MR, Dubenko I, Stadler S, Ali N (2008) Magnetoresistance and field-induced structural transitions in Ni50Mn50−x Sn x Heusler alloys. J Magn Magn Mater 320:L21–L2510.1016/j.jmmm.2007.06.016 ↗
3. Czaja P, Chulist R, Szczerba MJ, Przewoźnik J, Olejnik E, Chrobak A, Maziarz W, Cesari E (2016) Magnetostructural transition and magnetocaloric effect in highly textured Ni–Mn–Sn alloy. J Appl Phys 119:165102–16510610.1063/1.4947503 ↗
4. Sun W, Liu J, Lu B, Li Y, Yan A (2016) Large elastocaloric effect at small transformation strain in Ni45Mn44Sn11 metamagnetic shape memory alloys. Scr Mater 114:1–410.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.11.021 ↗
5. Karaca HE, Karaman I, Basaran B, Ren Y, Chumlyakov YI, Maier HJ (2009) Magnetic field-induced phase transformation in NiMnCoIn magnetic shape-memory alloys—a new actuation mechanism with large work output. Adv Funct Mater 19:983–99810.1002/adfm.200801322 ↗
6. Sutou Y, Imano Y, Koeda N, Omori T, Kainuma R, Ishida K, Oikawa K (2004) Magnetic and martensitic transformations of NiMnX(X = In, Sn, Sb) ferromagnetic shape memory alloys. Appl Phys Lett 85:4358–436010.1063/1.1808879 ↗
7. Krenke T, Acet M, Wassermann EF, Moya X, Manosa L, Planes A (2005) Martensitic transitions and the nature of ferromagnetism in the austenitic and martensitic states of Ni–Mn–Sn alloys. Phys Rev B 72:014412-1–014412-910.1103/PhysRevB.72.014412 ↗
8. Brown PJ, Gandy AP, Ishida K, Kainuma R, Kanomata T, Neumann K-U, Oikawa K, Ouladdiaf B, Ziebeck KRA (2016) The magnetic and structural properties of the magnetic shape memory compound Ni2Mn1.44Sn0.56. J Phys Condens Matter 18:2249–225910.1088/0953-8984/18/7/012 ↗
9. Otsuka K, Wayman CM (1998) Shape memory materials. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
10. Bhattacharya K (2003) Microstructure of martensite. Oxford University Press, Oxford10.1093/oso/9780198509349.001.0001 ↗
11. Mullner P, King AH (2010) Deformation of hierarchically twinned martensite. Acta Mater 58:5242–526110.1016/j.actamat.2010.05.048 ↗
12. Szczerba MJ, Chulist R, Kopacz S, Szczerba MS (2014) Effect of initial plastic strain on mechanical training of non-modulated Ni–Mn–Ga martensite structure. Mater Sci Eng A 611:e313–e31910.1016/j.msea.2014.06.005 ↗
13. Chulist R, Pagounis E, Bohm A, Oertel C-G, Skrotzki W (2012) Twin boundaries in trained 10 M Ni–Mn–Ga single crystals. Scr Mater 67:364–36710.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.05.026 ↗
14. Han M, Bennett JC, Gharghouri MA, Chen J, Hyatt CV, Mailman N (2008) Microstructure characterization of the non-modulated martensite in Ni–Mn–Ga alloy. Mater Charact 59:764–76810.1016/j.matchar.2007.06.010 ↗
15. Han M, Kong FF (2008) Twin boundary structure of the modulated variants in a Ni–Mn–Ga alloy. J Alloys Compd 458:218–22210.1016/j.jallcom.2007.04.025 ↗
16. Li Z, Zhang Y, Esling C, Zhao X, Zuo L (2011) Twin relationships of 5 M modulated martensite in Ni–Mn–Ga alloy. Acta Mater 59:3390–339710.1016/j.actamat.2011.02.014 ↗
17. Nishida M, Hara T, Matsuda M, Ii S (2008) Crystallography and morphology of various interfaces in Ti–Ni, Ti–Pd, and Ni–Mn–Ga shape memory alloys. Mater Sci Eng A 481–482:18–2710.1016/j.msea.2007.01.179 ↗
18. Matsuda M, Yasumoto Y, Hashimoto K, Hara T, Nishida M, Nishida M (2012) Transmission electron microscopy of twins in 10 M martensite in Ni–Mn–Ga ferromagnetic shape memory alloy. Mater Trans 53:902–90610.2320/matertrans.M2012002 ↗
19. Chulist R, Straka L, Lanska N, Soroka A, Sozinov A, Skrotzki W (2013) Characterization of mobile type I and type II twin boundaries in 10 M modulated Ni–Mn–Ga martensite by electron backscatter diffraction. Acta Mater 61:1913–192010.1016/j.actamat.2012.12.012 ↗
20. Muntifering B, Pond RC, Kovarik L, Browning ND, Mullner P (2014) Intra-variant substructure in Ni–Mn–Ga martensite: conjugation boundaries. Acta Mater 71:255–26310.1016/j.actamat.2014.03.018 ↗
21. Chulist R, Skrotzki W, Oertel C-G, Bohm A, Potschke M (2010) Change in microstructure during training of a Ni50Mn29Ga21 bicrystal. Scr Mater 63:548–55110.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.05.028 ↗
22. Chulist R, Straka L, Sozinov A, Lippmann T, Skroztki W (2013) Modulation reorientation in 10 M Ni–Mn–Ga martensite. Scr Mater 68:671–67410.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.01.024 ↗
23. Heczko O, Straka L, Seiner H (2013) Different micorstructures of mobile twin boundaries in 10 M modulated Ni–Mn–Ga martensite. Acta Mater 61:622–63110.1016/j.actamat.2012.10.007 ↗
24. Lin C, Yan H, Zhang Y, Esling C, Zhao X, Zuo L (2016) Crystal structure of modulated martensite and crystallographic correlations between martensite variants of Ni50Mn38Sn12. J Appl Cryst 49:1276–128310.1107/S1600576716010372 ↗
25. Yan H, Yang B, Zhang Y, Li Z, Esling C, Zhao X, Zuo L (2016) Variant organization and mechanical detwinning of modulated martensite in Ni–Mn–In metamagnetic shape-memory alloys. Acta Mater 111:75–8410.1016/j.actamat.2016.03.049 ↗
26. Czaja P, Szczerba MJ, Chulist R, Bałanda M, Przewoźnik J, Chumlyakov YI, Schell N, Kapusta C, Maziarz W (2016) Martensitic transition, structure and magnetic anisotropy of martensite in Ni–Mn–Sn single crystal. Acta Mater 118:213–22010.1016/j.actamat.2016.07.059 ↗
27. Szczerba MJ, Chulist R (2015) Detwinning of a non-modulated Ni–Mn–Ga martensite: from self-accommodated microstructure to single crystal. Acta Mater 85:67–7310.1016/j.actamat.2014.11.008 ↗
28. Li ZB, Zhang YD, Esling C, Zhao X, Zuo L (2011) Twin relationships of 5 M modulated martensite in Ni–Mn–Ga alloy. Acta Mater 59:3390–339710.1016/j.actamat.2011.02.014 ↗
29. Chulist R, Bohm A, Oertel C-G, Skrotzki W (2014) Self-accommodation in polycrystalline 10 M Ni–Mn–Ga martensite. J Mater Sci 49:3951–3955. doi: 10.1007/s10853-013-7996-z10.1007/s10853-013-7996-z ↗
30. Kohn RV, Muller S (1992) Branching of twins near an austenite-twinned-martensite interface. Philos Mag 66:697–71510.1080/01418619208201585 ↗
31. Zhang J, Cai W, Zheng Y, Zhao L (1998) Type II twins and their deformation characteristics in 18R martensite in a Cu–Zn–Al alloys. Mater Lett 34:351–35510.1016/S0167-577X(97)00205-X ↗
32. Szczerba MJ (2015) Non-modulated martensite microstructure with internal nanotwins in Ni–Mn–Ga alloys. Arch Metall Mater 60:2267–227010.1515/amm-2015-0373 ↗
33. Muntifering B, Kovarik L, Browning ND, Pond RC, Knowlton WB, Mullner P (2016) Stress-assisted removal of conjugation boundaries in non-modulated Ni–Mn–Ga by coordinated secondary twinning. J Mater Sci 51:457–466. doi: 10.1007/s10853-015-9236-110.1007/s10853-015-9236-1 ↗
34. Straka L, Heczko O, Seiner H, Lanska N, Drahokoupil J, Soroka A, Fahler S, Hanninen H, Sozinov A (2011) Highly mobile twinned interface in 10 M modulated Ni–Mn–Ga martensite: analysis beyond the tetragonal approximation of lattice. Acta Mater 59:7450–746310.1016/j.actamat.2011.09.020 ↗
35. Cesari E, Pons J, Santamarta R, Segui C, Chernenko VA (2004) Ferromagnetic shape memory alloys: an overview. Arch Metall Mater 49:779–789
36. Zarubova N, Ge Y, Heczko O, Hannula S-P (2013) In situ TEM study of deformation twinning in Ni–Mn–Ga non-modulated martensite. Acta Mater 61:5290–529910.1016/j.actamat.2013.05.020 ↗
37. Zarubova N, Ge Y, Gemperlova J, Gemperle A, Hannula S-P (2012) Dislocation mechanism of twinning in Ni–Mn–Ga. Funct Mater Lett 5:1250006-1–1250006-410.1142/S1793604712500063 ↗
38. Erkartal B, Duppel V, Niemann R, Schultz L, Fahler S, Schurmann U, Kienle L (2012) Structure and composition of magnetocaloric Ni–Mn–In–Co thin films on the nanoscale—a TEM study. Adv Eng Mater 14:710–71510.1002/adem.201200072 ↗