Nonstoichiometry in line compounds
Source abstract
Abstract
Phases having compositional fields narrower than about 1 at.% and appearing as lines in binary phase diagrams often are assumed to have properties independent of composition. That such an assumption can be seriously in error is illustrated by recent measurements on pairs of samples prepared to have compositions at opposing phase boundaries. Two microscopic properties, lattice locations of highly dilute solutes and diffusional jump frequencies, were studied, respectively, through measurement of static and dynamic nuclear quadrupole interactions using the method of perturbed angular correlation of gamma rays (PAC). At opposing boundary compositions, PAC probe atoms have been observed to occupy different lattice sites or to have jump frequencies differing by a factor of 100. Such gross differences suggest measurements of other properties of line compounds should be made on pairs of samples having the opposing boundary compositions in order to avoid inconsistent or unreproducible results.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Rare-earth and actinide compounds · Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties · Nuclear materials and radiation effects
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (11)
Show source-provided references
1. Massalski TB (ed) (1990) Binary alloy phase diagrams. ASM International, Materials Park, OH
2. Zacate MO, Collins GS (2004) Phys Rev B69:17420210.1103/PhysRevB.69.174202 ↗
3. Zacate MO, Collins GS (2004) Phys Rev B70:2420210.1103/PhysRevB.70.024202 ↗
4. Zacate MO, Favrot A, Collins SG (2004) Phys Rev Lett 92:225901; and Erratum, Phys Rev Lett 93:4990310.1103/PhysRevLett.93.049903 ↗
5. Collins GS, Favrot A, Kang L, Solodovnikov D, Zacate MO (2005) Defect Diff Forum 237–240:195–20010.4028/www.scientific.net/DDF.237-240.195 ↗
6. Collins GS, Favrot A, Kang L, Nieuwenhuis ER, Solodovnikov D, Wang J, Zacate ZO (2004) Hyperfine Interact 159:1–810.1007/s10751-005-9073-8 ↗
7. Schatz G, Weidinger A (1996) Nuclear condensed matter physics. John Wiley, New York
8. Baudry A, Boyer P (1987) Hyperfine Interact 35:80310.1007/BF02394496 ↗
9. Collins GS, Zacate MO (2001) Hyperfine Interact 136/137:641–64610.1023/A:1020538925066 ↗
10. Hao YL, Xu DS, Cui YY, Yang B, Li D (1999) Acta Mater 47:112910.1016/S1359-6454(99)00006-3 ↗
11. Hofsäss H (1996) Hyperfine Interact 97/98:247–28310.1007/BF02150180 ↗