Characterisation of Conform™ and conventionally extruded Al–4Mg–1Zr. Effect of extrusion route on superplasticity
Source abstract
Abstract
Continuous extrusion (Conform™) is a well-established technique for the production of profiles from both solid and particulate feed stock. To the first approximation it is considered to be analogous to conventional extrusion, although there are significant differences in the metal flow during both processes. Metal flow during conventional extrusion is characterised by relatively low redundant work, whereas the Conform™ process requires significant redundant work to be successful. Most of the available scientific literature to date is concerned with the simulation of the Conform™ process and not its effect on the resultant microstructure of the product. In this paper, a detailed comparison of the microstructure, texture and superplastic properties developed during Conform™ and conventional extrusion for a particulate Al–4Mg–1Zr alloy are presented.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Microstructure and mechanical properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (17)
Show source-provided references
1. Dashwood RJ, Grimes R, Harrison AW, Flower HM (2001) Mater Sci Forum 357–359:33910.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.357-359.339 ↗
2. Cook R, Grimes R, Dashwood RJ (2002) Enhanced formability of superplastic AlMgZr alloys made by particulate routes. In: Ultrafine grained materials II. TMS, pp 281–28810.1002/9781118804537.ch33 ↗
3. Green D (1972) J Inst Metal 100:295
4. Thomas PM (2004) Conform™-the use of alternative feedstock materials, vol 1. APT Aluminium Process & Product Technology, p 102
5. Pardoe JA (1981) Continuous extrusion of wire and sections from non-ferrous metal powders by the CONFORM process. In: Proc. of Int. Powder Metal. Conf: Modern developments in powder metallurgy, vol 12, p 353
6. Lu J, Saluja N, Riviere AL, Zhou Y (1998) J Mater Process Technol 79:20010.1016/S0924-0136(98)00011-9 ↗
7. Katsas S (2006) The role of solute and transition elements in the superplastic behaviour of aluminium alloys. Diploma thesis, Imperial College London
8. Eddahbi M, Carsi M, Ruano OA (2003) Mater Sci Eng A 361:3610.1016/S0921-5093(03)00502-1 ↗
9. Kaneko S, Murakami K, Sakai T (2009) Mater Sci Eng A 500:810.1016/j.msea.2008.09.057 ↗
10. Doherty RD, Kashyap K, Panchanadeeswaran S (1993) Acta Metall Mater 41:302910.1016/0956-7151(93)90117-B ↗
11. Hjelen J, Orsund R, Nes E (1991) Acta Metall Mater 39:137710.1016/0956-7151(91)90225-P ↗
12. Xue Q, Beyerlein IJ, Alexander DJ, Gray GT (2007) Acta Mater 55:65510.1016/j.actamat.2006.08.049 ↗
13. Cho JR, Jeong HS (2001) J Mater Process Technol 110:5310.1016/S0924-0136(00)00658-0 ↗
14. Cho JR, Jeong HS (2003) J Mater Process Technol 136:21710.1016/S0924-0136(03)00164-X ↗
15. Balog M, Simancic F, Bajana O, Requena G (2009) Mater Sci Eng A 504:110.1016/j.msea.2008.12.014 ↗
16. Katsas S, Jackson M, Dashwood R, Grimes R (2010) Mater Sci Eng A 527:102210.1016/j.msea.2009.09.014 ↗
17. Garcia DA, Dashwood RJ, Jackson M, Grimes R, Dye D (2010) Mater Sci Eng A 527:335810.1016/j.msea.2010.01.030 ↗