journal article·2015-02

Interface-level thermodynamic stability diagram for in situ internal oxidation of Ag(SnO2)p composites

Canhui Xu, Yong Jiang, Danqing Yi, Haibin Zhang, Shuming Peng, Jianhua Liang

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 50· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

We present a combined experimental and theoretical study on interfacial structure and thermodynamics in internally oxidized Ag(SnO2)p composites. The orientation relation between in situ formed SnO2 particles and the silver matrix was characterized using high-resolution transmission electron microscopy techniques. First-principles energetic calculations were then performed to predict the equilibrium interface structures and corresponding adhesion properties as functions of temperature and oxygen partial pressure. All results were combined to construct the interface-level thermodynamic stability diagram, for guiding the optimal design of internal oxidation parameters.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: ZnO doping and properties · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. Shashkov DA, Muller DA, Seidman DN (1999) Atomic-scale structure and chemistry of ceramic/metal interfaces-II: solute segregation at MgO/Cu(Ag) and CdO/Ag(Au) interfaces. Acta Mater 47:3953–396310.1016/S1359-6454(99)00256-6 ↗
2. Mogck S, Kooi BJ, De Hosson JTM (2004) Tailoring of misfit along interfaces between Zn x Mn3−x O4 and Ag. Acta Mater 52:5845–585110.1016/j.actamat.2004.08.042 ↗
3. Cazottes S, Zhang ZL, Daniel R, Chawla JS, Gall D, Dehm G (2010) Structural characterization of a Cu/MgO(001) interface using Cs-corrected HRTEM. Thin Solid Films 519:1662–166710.1016/j.tsf.2010.09.017 ↗
4. Zhou G (2009) Metal–oxide interfaces at the nanoscale. Appl Phys Lett 94:23311510.1063/1.3154546 ↗
5. Jiang Y, Wei Y, Smith JR, Hutchinson JW, Evans AG (2010) First principles based predictions of the toughness of a metal/oxide interface. Int J Mater Res 101:8–1510.3139/146.110254 ↗
6. Jiang Y, Smith JR, Evans AG (2008) First principles assessment of metal/oxide interface adhesion. Appl Phys Lett 92:14191810.1063/1.2907339 ↗
7. Smith JR, Jiang Y, Evans AG (2007) Adhesion of the gamma–Ni(Al)/alpha–Al2O3 interface: a first-principles assessment. Inter J Mater Res 98:1214–122110.3139/146.101592 ↗
8. Zhang W, Smith JR, Wang XG, Evans AG (2003) Influence of sulfur on the adhesion of the nickel/alumina interface. Phys Rev B 67:24541410.1103/PhysRevB.67.245414 ↗
9. Carling KM, Carter EA (2007) Effects of segregating elements on the adhesive strength and structure of the α-Al2O3/β-NiAl interface. Acta Mater 55:2791–280310.1016/j.actamat.2006.12.020 ↗
10. Zhang W, Smith JR, Evans AG (2002) The connection between ab initio calculations and interface adhesion measurements on metal/oxide systems: Ni/Al2O3 and Cu/Al2O3. Acta Mater 50:3803–381610.1016/S1359-6454(02)00177-5 ↗
11. Lan G, Jiang Y, Yi D, Liu S (2012) Theoretical prediction of impurity effects on the internally oxidized metal/oxide interface: the case study of S on Cu/Al2O3. Phys Chem Chem Phys 14:11178–1118410.1039/c2cp41079f ↗
12. Hashibon A, Elsässer C, Rühle M (2005) Structure at abrupt copper-alumina interfaces: an ab initio study. Acta Mater 53:5323–533210.1016/j.actamat.2005.07.036 ↗
13. Eremeev SV, Schmauder S, Hocker S, Kulkova SE (2009) Investigation of the electronic structure of Me/Al2O3(0001) interfaces. Physica B 404:2065–207110.1016/j.physb.2009.03.043 ↗
14. Feng J, Zhang W, Jiang W (2005) Ab initio study of Ag/Al2O3 and Au/Al2O3 interfaces. Phys Rev B 72:11542310.1103/PhysRevB.72.115423 ↗
15. Passerone D, Pignedoli CA, Valenza F, Muolo ML, Passerone A (2010) Ab initio simulations of the Ag(111)/Al2O3 interface at intermediate oxygen partial pressures. J Mater Sci 45:4265–4270. doi: 10.1007/s10853-010-4427-210.1007/s10853-010-4427-2 ↗
16. Mogck S, Kooi BJ, De Hosson JTM (2004) Ab initio transmission electron microscopy image simulations of coherent Ag–MgO interfaces. Phys Rev B 70:24542710.1103/PhysRevB.70.245427 ↗
17. Phillips CL, Bristowe PD (2008) First principles study of the adhesion asymmetry of a metal/oxide interface. J Mater Sci 43:3960–3968. doi: 10.1007/s10853-007-2137-110.1007/s10853-007-2137-1 ↗
18. Szabová L, Camellone MF, Huang M, Matolín V, Fabris S (2010) Thermodynamic, electronic and structural properties of Cu/CeO2 surfaces and interfaces from first-principles DFT + U calculations. J Chem Phys 133:23470510.1063/1.3515424 ↗
19. Nilsson O, Hauner F, Jeannot D (2004) Replacement of AgCdO by AgSnO2 in DC contactors. In: Proceedings of 50th IEEE Holm Conference on Electrical Contacts, Seattle, USA, pp. 70–74
20. Rieder W, Weichsler V (1992) Make erosion mechanism of Ag/CdO and Ag/SnO2 contacts. IEEE Trans Comp Hybrids Manuf Technol 3:332–33810.1109/33.148500 ↗
21. Gengenbach B, Mayer U, Michal R, Saeger KE (1985) Investigation on the switching behavior of AgSnO2 materials in commercial contactors. IEEE Trans Comp Hybrids Manuf Technol 8:58–6310.1109/TCHMT.1985.1136491 ↗
22. Lungu M, Gavriliu S, Canta T, Lucaci M, Enescu E (2006) AgSnO2 sintered electrical contacts with ultrafine and uniformly dispersed microstructure. J Optoelectron Adv Mater 8:576–581
23. Jeannot D, Pinard J, Ramoni P, Jost EM (1994) Physical and chemical properties of metal oxide additions to Ag–SnO2 contact materials and predictions of electrical performance. IEEE Trans Compon Packag Manuf Technol A 17:17–2310.1109/95.296363 ↗
24. Francisco HA, Myers M (1997) The effect of various silver tin oxide materials on contact performance under motor load (a.c.), Proceedings of the Forty-Third IEEE Holm Conference on Electrical Contacts, IEEE, pp. 254–263
25. Wu CP, Yi DQ, Xu CH, Li J, Wang B, Lu XD, Zhang H (2008) Oxidation of Ag–Sn–La alloy powders. Oxid Met 70:121–13610.1007/s11085-008-9106-1 ↗
26. VASP Guide; http://cms.mpi.univie.ac.at/vasp
27. Kresse G, Joubert J (1999) From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B 59:1758–177510.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
28. Vinet P, Rose JH, Ferrante J, Smith JR (1989) Universal features of the equation of state of solids. J Phys 1:1941–1963
29. Perdew JP, Chevary JA, Vosko SH, Jackson KA, Pederson MR, Singh DJ, Fiolhais C (1992) Atoms, molecules, solids, and surfaces: applications of the generalized gradient approximation for exchange and correlation. Phys Rev B 46:6671–668710.1103/PhysRevB.46.6671 ↗
30. Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M (1996) Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys Rev Lett 77:3865–386810.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
31. Liu L, Bassett WA (1973) Compression of Ag and phase transformation of NaCl. J Appl Phys 44:1475–147910.1063/1.1662396 ↗
32. Rantala TT, Rantala TS, Lantto V (1999) Surface relaxation of the (110) face of rutile SnO2. Surf Sci 420:103–10910.1016/S0039-6028(98)00833-4 ↗
33. Monkhorst HJ, Pack JD (1976) Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys Rev B 13:5188–519210.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188 ↗
34. Feynman RP (1939) Forces in molecules. Phys Rev 56:340–34310.1103/PhysRev.56.340 ↗
35. Jiang Y, Adams JB, Schilfgaarde M (2005) Density-functional calculation of CeO2 surfaces and prediction of effects of oxygen partial pressure and temperature on stabilities. J Chem Phys 123:06470110.1063/1.1949189 ↗
36. Levi G, Clarke DR, Kaplan WD (2004) Free surface and interface thermodynamics of liquid nickel in contact with alumina. Interface Sci 12:73–8310.1023/B:INTS.0000012295.38485.90 ↗
37. Kingery WD (1954) Metal–ceramic interactions: IV, absolute measurement of metal–ceramic interfacial energy and the interfacial adsorption of silicon from iron–silicon alloys. J Am Ceram Soc 37:42–4510.1111/j.1151-2916.1954.tb14002.x ↗
38. Tanaka S, Hirata T, Yida M, Ag–SnO2 electrical contact materials by high pressure internal oxidation, US Patent 5078810, Publ. date 1992-01-07