Effect of casting parameters on the freezing point position of the 304 stainless steel during twin-roll strip casting process by numerical simulation
Source abstract
Abstract
This study focuses on the numerical simulation of the temperature fields of the 304 stainless steel during twin-roll strip casting process. The cracks and fratographs of the 304 stainless steel strip with the practical casting parameters were observed by Scanning Electron Microscopy. The exit temperature of the 304 stainless steel during twin-roll strip casting process was measured. Meanwhile, it was simulated by means of finite element model. The observed results show that the strip from outside to inside are composed of refined crystal zone, columnar crystal one, and equated axis crystal one. The cracks occur on the strip surface, extended to interior along the columnar crystal boundary, and then, ended at the juncture between the columnar crystal zone and equated axis crystal one. The simulated result was compared to the measured temperature, which showed a good agreement, thus indicating that this model is valid and accurate. Then, by employing this model, the effects of the casting parameters, such as casting speed and casting temperature, on the freezing point position of the 304 stainless steel during twin-roll strip casting process were simulated too. The simulated results show that, the freezing point position is decreased with the increasing casting speed and casting temperature. For producing high-quality strip of 304 stainless steel during twin-roll strip casting, the limits of casting speed and casting temperature are 1.1 m·s−1 and 1,570 °C, respectively.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Solidification and crystal growth phenomena · Metallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (17)
Show source-provided references
1. Martins JP, Carvalho ALM, Padilha AF (2009) J Mater Sci 44:2966. doi: 10.1007/s10853-009-3393-z10.1007/s10853-009-3393-z ↗
2. Birol Y (2010) J Mater Sci 45:6727. doi: 10.1007/s10853-010-4766-z10.1007/s10853-010-4766-z ↗
3. Legoretta EC, Atkinson HV, Jones H (2007) J Mater Sci 43:5456. doi: 10.1007/s10853-008-2829-110.1007/s10853-008-2829-1 ↗
4. Santos CA, Spim JA, Garcia A (2000) J Mater Process Technol 10:233
5. Hong KS, Kim JG, Tomizuka M (2001) Contr Eng Pract 9:93310.1016/S0967-0661(01)00042-9 ↗
6. Mchugh KM, Delplanque JP, Johnson SB (2004) Mater Sci Eng A 383:9610.1016/j.msea.2004.02.041 ↗
7. Gras C, Meredith M, Hunt JD (2005) J Mater Process Technol 167:6210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.09.084 ↗
8. Kim WS, Kim DS, Kuznetsov AV (2000) Int J Heat Mass Tran 43:381110.1016/S0017-9310(00)00013-2 ↗
9. Cygler M, Wolf M (1986) Ironmak Steelmak. 13:27
10. Teoh LL (1988) Ironmak Steelmak 65:34
11. Haga T (2001) J Mater Process Technol 111:6410.1016/S0924-0136(01)00498-8 ↗
12. Park CM, Kim WS, Park GJ (2003) Mech Res Comm 30:29710.1016/S0093-6413(03)00033-8 ↗
13. Li XQ, Huang MH, Hu SC (2003) J Mater Process Technol 138:40310.1016/S0924-0136(03)00107-9 ↗
14. Kim JK, Hum MY, Lee JC, Jee KK, Engler O (2004) J Mater Sci 39:5371. doi: 10.1023/B:JMSC.0000039247.10346.5d10.1023/B:JMSC.0000039247.10346.5d ↗
15. Cho SH, Yoo YC (2001) J Mater Sci 36:4267. doi: 10.1023/A:101794981242510.1023/A:1017949812425 ↗
16. Choi J, Mazumder J (2002) J Mater Sci 37:2143. doi: 10.1023/A:101525832278010.1023/A:1015258322780 ↗
17. Fang Y, Wang ZM, Yang QX, Zhang YK, Liu LG, Hu HY, Zhang Y (2009) Int J Miner Metall Mater 16:30410.1016/S1674-4799(09)60054-6 ↗