journal article·2010-06

Electrical and magnetic properties of copper tellurite glasses

P. Sandhya Rani, R. Singh

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 45· Issue 11
Publisher page

Abstract

The glasses of composition (100 − x)TeO2–xCuO (x = 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 mol%) were prepared by melt quenching method. Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC), DC conductivity, Electron Spin Resonance (ESR), and magnetization measurements were undertaken on the glass samples. The glass-transition temperature, T g, decreases and the thermal stability (ΔT = T o − T g) increases with the increase in CuO content. The electrical conduction in these glasses is due to polaron hopping mechanism in the adiabatic regime. The ESR spectra of the x = 10 glass consists of a broad symmetrical line characteristic of Cu2+ clusters. The ESR signal linewidth increases and intensity decreases drastically with increase in CuO content from 10 to 20 mol%. No ESR signal could be observed for the glass samples with x ≥ 40. The absence of EPR signal is ascribed to antiferromagnetic interactions between the Cu2+ clusters. The magnetization measurements indicate all the samples to be in paramagnetic state. The M–H plots show a small hysteresis loop in the low-field region. These studies indicate the coexistence of antiferromagnetic (AFM) as well as ferromagnetic (FM) interactions between Cu 2+ ions in these glasses. The significant change in the properties of the glass at x = 20 is ascribed to the structural changes caused by CuO in the glass matrix.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Glass properties and applications · Phase-change materials and chalcogenides · Luminescence Properties of Advanced Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. Ovcharenko N, Yakhkind A (1968) Opt Mech Prom 3:47
2. Lines ME (1991) J Appl Phys 69:687610.1063/1.347677 ↗
3. Kim SH, Yoko T, Sakka S (1993) J Am Ceram Soc 76:248610.1111/j.1151-2916.1993.tb03970.x ↗
4. Wang JS, Vogel EM, Snitzer E (1994) Opt Mater 3:18710.1016/0925-3467(94)90004-3 ↗
5. Gateff E, Dimitriev Y (1979) Philos Mag 40:23310.1080/13642817908246373 ↗
6. Chung C, Mackenzie J (1980) J Non-Cryst Solids 42:35710.1016/0022-3093(80)90036-8 ↗
7. Brady GW (1957) J Chem Phys 27:30010.1063/1.1743690 ↗
8. Neov S, Kozhukharov V, Gerasimova I, Krezhov K, Sidzhimov B (1979) J Phys C 12:247510.1088/0022-3719/12/13/012 ↗
9. Dimitriev Y, Dimitriev V, Arunaudov M (1983) J Mater Sci 18:1353. doi: 10.1007/BF0111195410.1007/BF01111954 ↗
10. Burger H, Kneipp K, Hobert H, Vogel W, Kozhukharov V, Neov S (1992) J Non-Cryst Solids 151:13410.1016/0022-3093(92)90020-K ↗
11. Kozhukharov V, Marinov M, Grigorova G (1978) J Non-Cryst Solids 28:42910.1016/0022-3093(78)90092-3 ↗
12. Singh R (1987) J Phys D 20:54810.1088/0022-3727/20/4/025 ↗
13. Bahgat AA, Shaltout II, Abu-Elazm AM (1992) J Non-Cryst Solids 150:17910.1016/0022-3093(92)90119-5 ↗
14. Chowdari BVR, Tan KL, Ling Fang (1998) Solid State Ion 113–115:71110.1016/S0167-2738(98)00334-8 ↗
15. Mott NF (1968) J Non-Cryst Solids 1:110.1016/0022-3093(68)90002-1 ↗
16. Austin G, Mott NF (1969) Adv Phys 18:4110.1080/00018736900101267 ↗
17. Ardelean I, Ilonca G, Peteanu M (1982) J Non-Cryst Solids 51:38910.1016/0022-3093(82)90159-4 ↗
18. Singh R, Chakravarthi JS (1997) Phy Rev B 55:555010.1103/PhysRevB.55.5550 ↗
19. Singh R, Chakravarthi JS (1995) Phys Rev B 51:1639610.1103/PhysRevB.51.16396 ↗
20. Ardelean I, Filip S (2003) J Optoelectron Adv Mater 5:157
21. Ardelean I, Ciceo Lucacel R (2005) Phys Chem Glasses 46:491
22. Hassan MA, Hogarth CA (1988) J Mater Sci 23:2500. doi: 10.1007/BF0111190810.1007/BF01111908 ↗
23. Criocas F, Mendiratta SK, Ardelean I, Valente MA (2001) Eur Phys J B 20:23510.1007/PL00022985 ↗
24. Khattak GD, Mekki A, Wenger LE (2004) J Non-Cryst Solids 337:17410.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2003.08.088 ↗