Effect of inner oxygen on the interfacial layer formation for HfO2 gate dielectric
Source abstract
Abstract
The interfacial layer (IL) formed at the HfO2/Si interface was investigated by using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Differently with the previous reports, it is concluded that the inner oxygen from bulk film predominates the oxidation process in interface region rather than the oxygen introduced from outer environment. First, from FT-IR, it is found that the formation of the IL strongly relies on the annealing temperature but does not obviously rely on the HfO2 thickness and the annealing atmosphere. Second, the contradistinctive images of Hf/Si annealed in oxygen ambient and Hf/SiO2 annealed in vacuum were investigated by TEM, which confirms the conclusion obtained from FT-IR data that the IL is formed not by a diffusion of the oxygen from the annealing atmosphere, but by a reaction within the interface region. Third, the Hf 4f, O 1s, and Si 2p core-level energy states of Hf/SiO2 stack annealed in vacuum were investigated by XPS using two ways, one is investigating the samples annealed in vacuum for varied time and the other is investigating the fully oxidized sample in different depth. Based on the experiments, it is concluded that the inner oxygen from bulk films (HfO2 or SiO2) has greater influence on the IL formation comparing with the outer oxygen from environment.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis · Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (13)
Show source-provided references
1. Stathis JH, DiMaria DJ (1998) Tech Dig Int Electron Devices Meet 167
2. Wilk GD, Wallace RM, Anthony JM (2001) J Appl Phys 89:524310.1063/1.1361065 ↗
3. Joo MS, Cho BJ, Yeo CC, Wu N, Yu H, Zhu C, Li MF, Kwong D-L, Balasubramanian N (2003) Jpn J Appl Phys 42:22010.1143/JJAP.42.L220 ↗
4. Emotoa T, Akimoto K, Yoshida Y, Ichimiya A, Nabatame T, Toriumi A (2005) Appl Surf Sci 244:5510.1016/j.apsusc.2004.10.088 ↗
5. Yamamoto K, Hayashi S, Kubota M, Niwa M (2002) Appl Phys Lett 81:205310.1063/1.1506782 ↗
6. Cho M-H, Moon DW, Park SA, Kim YK, Jeong K, Kang SK, Ko D-H, Doh SJ, Lee JH, Lee I (2004) Appl Phys Lett 84:524310.1063/1.1764595 ↗
7. Gougousi T, Parsons GN (2004) J Appl Phys 95:139110.1063/1.1636513 ↗
8. Lau WS (1999) Infrared characterization for microelectronics. World Scientific, Singapore
9. Miyata N et al (2003) JJAP 42:L13810.1143/JJAP.42.L138 ↗
10. Wang SJ, Lim PC, Huan ACH, Liu CL, Chai JW, Chow SY, Pan JS, Li Q, Ong CK (2003) Appl Phys Lett 82:204710.1063/1.1565182 ↗
11. Vincent BC (2000) Handbook of monochromatic XPS spectra. Wiley, New York
12. Jeon TS, White JM, Kwong DL (2001) Appl Phys Lett 78:36810.1063/1.1339994 ↗
13. Chang JP, Yin YS (2001) Appl Phys Lett 79:382410.1063/1.1419030 ↗