Dilatometric study of martensitic transformation in NiTiCu and NiTi shape memory alloys
Source abstract
Abstract
Dilatometric measurements have been carried out for the study of nature of martensitic transformation in the NiTiCu and NiTi shape memory alloy wire samples. Investigation has been done in the heat-treat temperature range 300–800°C. NiTiCu exhibits only single stage A → M martensitic transformation in the entire heat-treat temperature range indicating the suppression of R-phase by Cu substitution. NiTi shows the two-stage A → R → M martensitic transformation in the heat-treat temperature range 340–410°C and the single-stage A → M martensitic transformation above heat-treat temperature 410°C. The extent of dilation during phase transformation decreases with increasing heat-treat temperature in both the alloys. Effect of first 15 thermal cycles on transformation temperatures in both the alloys has been studied. It is found that transformation temperatures are unaffected with thermal cycles in NiTiCu whereas considerable decrease in transformation temperatures has been observed in the case of NiTi. The stability of transformation temperatures in NiTiCu during M ↔ A transformation against thermal cycling may be attributed to the associated smaller thermal hysteresis compared to NiTi.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Shape Memory Alloy Transformations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (14)
Show source-provided references
1. K. Otsuka and K. Shimizu, International Metals Reviews 31(3) (1986) 93.
2. E. Hornbogen, Prakt. Met. 26 (1989) 279.
3. J. Uchil, K. P. Mohanchandra, K. K. Mahesh and K. Ganesh kumara, Physica B. 253 (1998) 83.10.1016/S0921-4526(98)00378-0 ↗
4. J. Uchil, K. P. Mohanchandra, K. Ganesh kumara and K. K. Mahesh, Mat. Sci. Eng. A 251 (1998) 58.10.1016/S0921-5093(98)00636-4 ↗
5. T. H. Nam, T. Saburi, Y. Kawamura and K. Shimizu, Met. Trans. JIM 31(4) (1990) 262.10.2320/matertrans1989.31.262 ↗
6. Y. C. Lo, S. K. Wu and H. E. Horng, Acta. Metall. Mater. 41(3) (1993) 747.10.1016/0956-7151(93)90007-F ↗
7. T. Nam, T. Saburi and K. Shimizu, Met. Trans. JIM 31(11) (1990) 959.10.2320/matertrans1989.31.959 ↗
8. V. Recarte, R. B. Perez-saez, M. L. No and J. San juan, J. Phys. IV France 7 (1997) C5-329.
9. J. Uchil, K. P. Mohanchandra, K. K. Mahesh and K. Ganesh kumara, Proc. SPIE Vol. 3675 (1999) p. 321.10.1117/12.352804 ↗
10. W. B. Cross, A. H. Kariotis and F. J. Smith, NASA, CR-1433 (1969) 20.
11. F. G. Gil, J. M. Manero and J. A. Planell, J. Mater Sci. 30 (1995) 2526.10.1007/BF00362129 ↗
12. V. Zeldovich, G. Sobyanina and T. V. Novoselova, J. Phys. IV France 7 (1997) C5-299.
13. T. Fukuda, A. Deguchi, T. Kakeshita and T. Saburi, Mat. Trans. JIM, 38(6) (1997) 514.10.2320/matertrans1989.38.514 ↗
14. K. Otsuka and C. M. Wayman, “Shape memory materials” (Cambridge University Press, UK, 1998) p. 75.