journal article·2020-03Open access

The suitability of Synbone® as a tissue analogue in ballistic impacts

Bailey J. Henwood, Gareth Appleby-Thomas

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 55· Issue 7

Abstract

Knowledge of material behaviour under impact is of key importance to understand ballistic impact events on tissue. Bone—with its complex underlying microstructure—is no exception; the microstructural network in bone is not only crucial to its integrity, but also provides a pathway for energy dispersion upon impact (Piekarski in J Appl Phys 41:215–225, 1970). Synbone®, a Swiss-made polyurethane bone simulant, has been considered as a potential bone analogue, particularly for cranial structures (Smith et al. in Leg Med 17(5):427–435, 2015; Riva et al. in Forensic Sci Int 294: 150–159, 2019). This study focused on long bone models and cylinders available from Synbone®, with the aim of determining their efficacy for use in ballistic testing and recreation. Comparisons were made between porcine bone and multiple Synbone® models regarding projectile energy loss and damaged surface area using high-speed video and high-resolution photography. CT and reverse ballistics techniques were also used as diagnostic tools. A significant correlation was made between real bone and Synbone®’s ballistic cylinders in all aspects of this study; however, it was observed that osteoporotic cylinders and anatomical models differ significantly in their reaction to impact. Consequently, the use of Synbone® as a ballistic target simulant—particularly when legal or practical accuracy is essential—will need to be treated carefully, giving due attention to these limitations.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Traumatic Ocular and Foreign Body Injuries · Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics · Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. Berryman H, Lanfear A, Shriley N (2012) The biomechanics of gunshot trauma to bone: research considerations within the present judicial climate. In: Dirkmaat D (ed) A companion to forensic anthropology. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, West Sussex, pp 390–39910.1002/9781118255377.ch18 ↗
2. Rho J, Kuhn-Spearing L, Zioupos P (1998) Mechanical properties and the hierarchal structure of bone. Mech Eng Phys 20:92–102
3. Piekarski K (1970) Fracture of bone. J Appl Phys 41:215–22510.1063/1.1658323 ↗
4. DiMaio V (2016) Gunshot wounds; practical aspects of firearms, ballistics and forensic techniques, 3rd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton
5. Berryman H, Smith O, Symes S (2007) Diameter of cranial gunshot wounds as a function of bullet calibre. J Forensic Sci 52(3):751–75410.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00443.x ↗
6. Ross A (1996) Calibre estimation from cranial entrance defect measurements. J Forensic Sci 41:629–63310.1520/JFS13966J ↗
7. Paschall A, Ross A (2017) Bone mineral density and wounding capacity of handguns; implications for estimation of caliber. Int J Leg Med 45:161–16610.1007/s00414-016-1420-6 ↗
8. Berryman H, Gunther W (2000) Keyhole defect production in tubular bone. J Forensic Sci 45(2):123–13110.1520/JFS14712J ↗
9. Henwood B, Oost T, Fairgrieve S (2019) Bullet caliber and type categorization from gunshot wounds in Sus scrofa (Linnaeus) long bone. J Forensic Sci. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.1400410.1111/1556-4029.14004 ↗
10. Cohen H, Kugel C, May H, Medlej B, Stein D, Slon V, Hershkovitz I, Brosh T (2016) The impact velocity and bone fracture pattern. Forensic Perspect 266:54–62
11. Kneubuehl B, Coupland R, Rothschild M, Thali M (2008) Wound ballistics. Springer, Berlin
12. Smith M, James S, Pover T, Ball N, Barnetson V, Foster B, Guy C, Rickman J, Walton V (2015) Fantastic plastic? Experimental evaluation of polyurethane bone substitutes as proxies for human bone in trauma simulations. Leg Med 17(5):427–43510.1016/j.legalmed.2015.06.007 ↗
13. Synbone® (2019) Portfolio for ballistic testing. https://www.synbone.com/app/uploads/2017/01/1484314977-b61bc01138a7d03c233f8e8eec59462c.pdf. Accessed 13 Apr 2019
14. Fitzmaurice B (2014) On the properties and suitability of Synbone as a tissue simulant. M.Sc. dissertation, Cranfield University
15. Riva F, Lombardo P, Zech W, Jackowski C, Schyma C (2019) Individual synthetic head models in wound ballistics- a feasibility study based on real cases. Forensic Sci Int 294:150–15910.1016/j.forsciint.2018.11.020 ↗
16. Aerssens J, Boonen S, Lowet G, Dequeker J (1998) Interspecies differences in bone composition, density and quality: potential implications for in vivo bone research. Endocrinology 139(2):663–67010.1210/endo.139.2.5751 ↗
17. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (2015) version 23.0.0.2
18. Everett B, Shrondal A (2010) The Cambridge dictionary of statistics, vol 4. Cambridge University, Cambridge10.1017/CBO9780511779633 ↗
19. Appleby-Thomas GJ, Jaansalu K, Hameed A, Painter J, Shackel J, Rowley J (2019) A comparison of ballistic behaviour of conventionally sintered and additively manufactured alumina. Def Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dt.2019.06.02010.1016/j.dt.2019.06.020 ↗