journal article·2020-01

In vitro assessment of polyethylene glycol and polyvinylpyrrolidone as hydrophilic additives on bioseparation by polysulfone membranes

Michaela Kohlová, Célia Gomes Amorim, Alberto da Nova Araújo, Alice Santos-Silva, Petr Solich, Maria Conceição B. S. M. Montenegro

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 55· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Considering the continuous increment of morbidity in patients with renal disease, the improvement of polymeric membranes characteristics for haemodialysis is a challenging issue. The efficient removal of middle size uremic toxins, as well as biocompatibility is crucial characteristics to ameliorate chronic kidney disease patients’ outcomes. In this study, polysulfone membranes with different hydrophilic additives, molecular weight and concentrations were prepared by spin coating method, followed by phase inversion via immersion precipitation. The removal of urea, lysozyme and bovine serum albumin was studied using a miniaturized flow system, mimicking haemodialysis conditions. The optimal composition was 15.0 wt% of polysulfone and 2.5 wt% of polyvinylpyrrolidone K30. This selected membrane was fully permeable for urea, showed up to 50% rejection of lysozyme and very high rejection of albumin. The additive PVP K30 played important role in the improvement of porosity, without compromising the mechanical strength of the membrane. The biocompatibility of membrane was evaluated by material-induced haemolysis and platelet activation tests. The platelet activation and haemolysis were negligible, compared to other biocompatible materials. These results confirmed the haemocompatibility of the optimized membrane. Therefore, the membrane is not expected to modulate the biological response, when used for the haemodialysis treatment.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dialysis and Renal Disease Management · Muscle and Compartmental Disorders · Membrane Separation Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (60)

Show source-provided references
1. Hill NR, Fatoba ST, Oke JL et al (2016) PLoS ONE 11:e0158765. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.015876510.1371/journal.pone.0158765 ↗
2. Ma KW, Greene EL, Raij L (1992) Am J Kidney Dis 19:505. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6386(12)80827-410.1016/S0272-6386(12)80827-4 ↗
3. Levey AS, Coresh J (2012) Lancet 379:165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60178-510.1016/S0140-6736(11)60178-5 ↗
4. Misra M (2008) Hemodial Int 12(Suppl 2):S25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-4758.2008.00320.x10.1111/j.1542-4758.2008.00320.x ↗
5. Sakai K (2000) Front Med Biol Eng 10:11710.1163/15685570052061973 ↗
6. A Karkar (2013) Advances in hemodialysis techniques. INTECH Open Access Publisher10.5772/52444 ↗
7. Dhondt A, Vanholder R, Van Biesen W, Lameire N (2000) Kidney Int Suppl 76:S4710.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.07606.x ↗
8. Vanholder RC, Glorieux GL, De Smet RV (2003) Hemodial Int 7:162. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1492-7535.2003.00033.x10.1046/j.1492-7535.2003.00033.x ↗
9. Clark WR, Hamburger RJ, Lysaght MJ (1999) Kidney Int 56:2005. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.00784.x10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.00784.x ↗
10. Kohlova M, Amorim CG, Araujo A, Santos-Silva A, Solich P, Montenegro M (2019) J Artif Organs 22:14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-018-1059-910.1007/s10047-018-1059-9 ↗
11. Bowry SK, Gatti E, Vienken J (2011) Contrib Nephrol 173:110. https://doi.org/10.1159/00032896010.1159/000328960 ↗
12. Urbani A, Sirolli V, Lupisella S et al (2012) Blood Transfus 10(Suppl 2):s101. https://doi.org/10.2450/2012.014S10.2450/2012.014S ↗
13. Deppisch R, Gohl H, Smeby L (1998) Nephrol Dial Transplant 13:135410.1093/oxfordjournals.ndt.a027892 ↗
14. Liu Y, Koops GH, Strathmann H (2003) J Membrane Sci 223:187. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(03)00322-310.1016/S0376-7388(03)00322-3 ↗
15. Alcantar NA, Aydil ES, Israelachvili JN (2000) J Biomed Mater Res 51:34310.1002/1097-4636(20000905)51:3<343::AID-JBM7>3.0.CO;2-D ↗
16. Bergström K, Holmberg K, Safranj A et al (1992) J Biomed Mater Res 26:779. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.82026060710.1002/jbm.820260607 ↗
17. Butruk B, Trzaskowski M, Ciach T (2012) Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 32:1601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2012.04.05010.1016/j.msec.2012.04.050 ↗
18. Namekawa K, Kaneko A, Sakai K, Kunikata S, Matsuda M (2011) J Artif Organs 14:52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-011-0552-110.1007/s10047-011-0552-1 ↗
19. Chang T, DeFine L, Alexander T, Kyu T (2015) J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 103:539. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.3321510.1002/jbm.b.33215 ↗
20. Kim JH, Min BR, Park HC, Won J, Kang YS (2001) J Appl Polym Sci 81:3481. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.180410.1002/app.1804 ↗
21. Zhang YJ, Lin R, Yuan MY, Yue X (2013) Desalin Water Treat 51:3903. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2013.78174110.1080/19443994.2013.781741 ↗
22. Chakrabarty B, Ghoshal AK, Purkait MK (2008) J Membrane Sci 309:209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2007.10.02710.1016/j.memsci.2007.10.027 ↗
23. Chakrabarty B, Ghoshal A, Purkait M (2008) J Membrane Sci 315:3610.1016/j.memsci.2008.02.027 ↗
24. Abetz V, Brinkmann T, Dijkstra M et al (2006) Adv Eng Mater 8:328. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.20060003210.1002/adem.200600032 ↗
25. Wang Z, Ma J, Wang P (2011) Desalin Water Treat 34:197. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2011.279910.5004/dwt.2011.2799 ↗
26. Norrman K, Ghanbari-Siahkali A, Larsen NB (2005) Annual Reports Section C 101:174. https://doi.org/10.1039/b408857n10.1039/b408857n ↗
27. Holda AK, Vankelecom IFJ (2015) J Appl Polym Sci. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.4213010.1002/app.42130 ↗
28. Young T-H, Chen L-W (1995) Desalination 103:233. https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-9164(95)00076-310.1016/0011-9164(95)00076-3 ↗
29. Smolders CA, Reuvers AJ, Boom RM, Wienk IM (1992) J Membrane Sci 73:259. https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-7388(92)80134-610.1016/0376-7388(92)80134-6 ↗
30. M Mulder (2000) in Wilson I PC, Cooke M (ed) Encyclopedia of Separation Sciences, 1 edn. Elsevier
31. Kim IC, Lee KH (2003) J Appl Polym Sci 89:2562. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1200910.1002/app.12009 ↗
32. Ma YX, Shi FM, Ma J, Wu MN, Zhang J, Gao CJ (2011) Desalination 272:51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2010.12.05410.1016/j.desal.2010.12.054 ↗
33. Sofiah H, Noraaini A, Marinah M (2010) Journal of Applied Sciences 10:332510.3923/jas.2010.3325.3330 ↗
34. Bradford MM (1976) Anal Biochem 72:24810.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3 ↗
35. Levine JM, Leon R, Steigmann F (1961) Clin Chem 7:48810.1093/clinchem/7.5.488 ↗
36. Sinha MK, Purkait MK (2013) J Membrane Sci 437:7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.03.00310.1016/j.memsci.2013.03.003 ↗
37. Mahlicli FY, Altinkaya SA (2014) J Membrane Sci 449:2710.1016/j.memsci.2013.07.061 ↗
38. Vienken J (2013) Problemy Eksploatacji 3:7–16
39. Kim IC, Lee KH (2004) J Membrane Sci 230:183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2003.11.00210.1016/j.memsci.2003.11.002 ↗
40. Chen J, Li J, Zhan X, Han X, Chen C (2010) Front Chem Eng China 4:30010.1007/s11705-009-0280-8 ↗
41. Yoo SH, Kim JH, Jho JY, Won J, Kang YS (2004) J Membrane Sci 236:203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2004.02.01710.1016/j.memsci.2004.02.017 ↗
42. Zhao S, Wang Z, Wei X et al (2011) J Membrane Sci 385–386:110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.09.02910.1016/j.memsci.2011.09.029 ↗
43. Sivakumar M, Mohan DR, Rangarajan R (2006) J Membrane Sci 268:208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2005.06.01710.1016/j.memsci.2005.06.017 ↗
44. Matsuyama H, Maki T, Teramoto M, Kobayashi K (2003) Separ Sci Technol 38:3449. https://doi.org/10.1081/Ss-12002340810.1081/Ss-120023408 ↗
45. Su BH, Fu P, Li Q et al (2008) J Mater Sci Mater Med 19:745. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-007-3006-910.1007/s10856-007-3006-9 ↗
46. Chang T, Neelakandan C, Kyu T, Tseng Y-T, DeFine L, Alexander T (2014) Polymer 55:5235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2014.07.04410.1016/j.polymer.2014.07.044 ↗
47. Boom RM, Wienk IM, Vandenboomgaard T, Smolders CA (1992) J Membrane Sci 73:277. https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-7388(92)80135-710.1016/0376-7388(92)80135-7 ↗
48. Cabasso I, Robert K, Klein E, Smith J (1977) J Appl Polym Sci 21:188310.1002/app.1977.070210715 ↗
49. Sabri S, Najjar A, Manawi Y et al (2019) Membranes. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes902002910.3390/membranes9020029 ↗
50. Sethuraman A, Han M, Kane RS, Belfort G (2004) Langmuir 20:7779. https://doi.org/10.1021/la049454q10.1021/la049454q ↗
51. Xu LC, Bauer JW, Siedlecki CA (2014) Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 124:49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.09.04010.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.09.040 ↗
52. Jung B, Yoon JK, Kim B, Rhee HW (2004) J Membrane Sci 243:45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2004.06.01110.1016/j.memsci.2004.06.011 ↗
53. Moradihamedani P, Abdullah AHB (2016) Desalin Water Treat 57:2554210.1080/19443994.2016.1150890 ↗
54. Xu LC, Siedlecki CA (2007) Biomaterials 28:3273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.03.03210.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.03.032 ↗
55. Tegoulia VA, Cooper SL (2000) J Biomed Mater Res 50:29110.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(20000605)50:3<291::AID-JBM2>3.0.CO;2-1 ↗
56. Sun SD, Yue YL, Huang XH, Meng DY (2003) J Membrane Sci 222:3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(03)00313-210.1016/S0376-7388(03)00313-2 ↗
57. Tsai H-A, Huang D-H, Ruaan R-C, Lai J-Y (2001) Ind Eng Chem Res 40:591710.1021/ie010026e ↗
58. Ravishankar H, Roddick F, Navaratna D, Jegatheesan V (2018) J Environ Manage 213:168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.02.06310.1016/j.jenvman.2018.02.063 ↗
59. Seyfert UT, Biehl V, Schenk J (2002) Biomol Eng 19:9110.1016/S1389-0344(02)00015-1 ↗
60. IOf Standardization (2002) Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices: Selection of Tests for Interactions with Blood. International Organization for Standardization