Predictions of the thermal conductivity of multiphase nanocomposites with complex structures
Source abstract
Abstract
Multiphase nanocomposites have drawn substantial attention due to their advanced functionality, including high thermal conductivity. Herein, theoretical models are developed based on modifications of the effective medium theory and then validated to predict the effective thermal conductivity (Keff) of three common multiphase nanocomposites: nanosheet/nanoparticle/polymer, nanotube/nanoparticle/polymer, and nanosheet/nanotube/polymer. Case studies showed that the predicted Keff agreed well with available experimental data, validating the developed models. Moreover, quantifiable material properties, like the thermal conductivity of nanofillers, the morphology of nanofillers, and the interfacial thermal resistance around nanofillers, were used to investigate their effects on the Keff of multiphase nanocomposites. This quantitative study not only can provide simplified strategy to predict the Keff for diverse multiphase nanocomposites, but it can also guide the design of multiphase nanocomposites with enhanced thermal conductivity.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Thermal properties of materials · Composite Material Mechanics · Graphene research and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. Yu J, Xiong J, Cheng B, Liu S (2005) Appl Catal B 60:211–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2005.03.00910.1016/j.apcatb.2005.03.009 ↗
2. Gupta TK, Singh BP, Mathur RB, Dhakate SR (2014) Nanoscale 6:842–851. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3nr04565j10.1039/C3NR04565J ↗
3. De Vivo B, Lamberti P, Spinelli G et al (2013) Composites Science and Technology 89:69–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.09.02110.1016/j.compscitech.2013.09.021 ↗
4. Yang K, Gu M (2010) Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 41:215–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.10.01910.1016/j.compositesa.2009.10.019 ↗
5. Safdari M, Al-Haik MS (2013) Carbon 64:111–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2013.07.04210.1016/j.carbon.2013.07.042 ↗
6. Naffakh M, Diez-Pascual AM, Marco C, Ellis G (2012) J Mater Chem 22:1418–1425. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1jm12543e10.1039/C1JM12543E ↗
7. Kumar UN, Kratz K, Wagermaier W, Behl M, Lendlein A (2010) J Mater Chem 20:3404–3415. https://doi.org/10.1039/b923000a10.1039/b923000a ↗
8. Sumfleth J, de Almeida Prado LAS, Sriyai M, Schulte K (2008) Polymer 49:5105–5112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2008.09.01610.1016/j.polymer.2008.09.016 ↗
9. Li L, Wang S, Hui D, Qiu J (2015) Compos B Eng 71:40–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.11.03910.1016/j.compositesb.2014.11.039 ↗
10. Gong F, Ding Z, Fang Y et al (2018) ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10:14614–14621. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b1958210.1021/acsami.7b19582 ↗
11. Gong F, Li H, Wang W et al (2018) Coatings 8:63–8010.3390/coatings8020063 ↗
12. Yuan C, Duan B, Li L, Xie B, Huang M, Luo X (2015) ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:13000–13006. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b0300710.1021/acsami.5b03007 ↗
13. Guan F-L, Gui C-X, Zhang H-B, Jiang Z-G, Jiang Y, Yu Z-Z (2016) Compos B Eng 98:134–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.04.06210.1016/j.compositesb.2016.04.062 ↗
14. Yu A, Ramesh P, Sun X, Bekyarova E, Itkis ME, Haddon RC (2008) Adv Mater 20:4740–4744. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20080040110.1002/adma.200800401 ↗
15. Han Z, Fina A (2011) Prog Polym Sci 36:914–944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.11.00410.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.11.004 ↗
16. Gong F, Papavassiliou DV, Duong HM (2014) Numerical Heat Transfer. Part A: Applications 65:1023–1043. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407782.2013.85097210.1080/10407782.2013.850972 ↗
17. Gong F, Duong HM, Papavassiliou DV (2015) The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 119:7614–7620. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0065110.1021/acs.jpcc.5b00651 ↗
18. Gong F, Tam YS, Nguyen ST, Duong HM (2015) Chem Phys Lett 627:116–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2015.03.03510.1016/j.cplett.2015.03.035 ↗
19. Gong F, Duong H, Papavassiliou D (2016) Nanomaterials 6:142–15610.3390/nano6080142 ↗
20. Gong F, Liu J, Yang J et al (2017) RSC Advances 7:13615–13622. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra27768c10.1039/C6RA27768C ↗
21. Gong F, Bui K, Papavassiliou DV, Duong HM (2014) Carbon 78:305–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2014.07.00710.1016/j.carbon.2014.07.007 ↗
22. Gong F, Hongyan Z, Papavassiliou DV, Bui K, Lim C, Duong HM (2014) Nanotechnology 25:20510110.1088/0957-4484/25/20/205101 ↗
23. Gao Y, Müller-Plathe F (2016) J Phys Chem B 120:1336–1346. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b0839810.1021/acs.jpcb.5b08398 ↗
24. Roy AK, Farmer BL, Varshney V, Sihn S, Lee J, Ganguli S (2012) ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 4:545–563. https://doi.org/10.1021/am201496z10.1021/am201496z ↗
25. Nan C-W (1993) Prog Mater Sci 37:1–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/0079-6425(93)90004-510.1016/0079-6425(93)90004-5 ↗
26. Nan C-W, Birringer R, Clarke DR, Gleiter H (1997) J Appl Phys 81:6692–6699. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.36520910.1063/1.365209 ↗
27. Chu K, Li W-S, Jia C-C, Tang F-L (2012) Appl Phys Lett 101:211903. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.476789910.1063/1.4767899 ↗
28. Nan C-W, Liu G, Lin Y, Li M (2004) Appl Phys Lett 85:3549–3551. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.180887410.1063/1.1808874 ↗
29. Huang X, Qi X, Boey F, Zhang H (2012) Chem Soc Rev 41:666–686. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1cs15078b10.1039/C1CS15078B ↗
30. Geng Y, Liu MY, Li J, Shi XM, Kim JK (2008) Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 39:1876–1883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.09.00910.1016/j.compositesa.2008.09.009 ↗
31. Novoselov KS, Fal′ko VI, Colombo L, Gellert PR, Schwab MG, Kim K (2012) Nature 490:192–200. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature1145810.1038/nature11458 ↗
32. Biercuk MJ, Llaguno MC, Radosavljevic M, Hyun JK, Johnson AT, Fischer JE (2002) Appl Phys Lett 80:2767–2769. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.146969610.1063/1.1469696 ↗
33. Mi Y-N, Liang G, Gu A, Zhao F, Yuan L (2013) Ind Eng Chem Res 52:3342–3353. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie302956910.1021/ie3029569 ↗
34. Jianwei C, Tahir Ç, William AG III (2000) Nanotechnology 11:6510.1088/0957-4484/11/2/305 ↗
35. Berber S, Kwon Y-K, Tománek D (2000) Phys Rev Lett 84:4613–461610.1103/PhysRevLett.84.4613 ↗
36. Balandin AA, Ghosh S, Bao W et al (2008) Nano Lett 8:902–907. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl073187210.1021/nl0731872 ↗
37. Balandin AA (2011) Nat Mater 10:569–581. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat306410.1038/nmat3064 ↗
38. http://accuratus.com/alumni.html
39. Shenogin S, Xue L, Ozisik R et al (2004) J Appl Phys 95:8136–8144. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.173632810.1063/1.1736328 ↗
40. Huxtable ST, Cahill DG, Shenogin S et al (2003) Nat Mater 2:731–734. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat99610.1038/nmat996 ↗
41. Dikin DA, Stankovich S, Zimney EJ et al (2007) Nature 448:457–460. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature0601610.1038/nature06016 ↗
42. Mohammad A, Elena A, Michael CB, Florian M-P (2009) Nanotechnology 20:11570410.1088/0957-4484/20/11/115704 ↗
43. Bui K, Grady BP, Saha MC, Papavassiliou DV (2013) Appl Phys Lett 102:203116. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.480776910.1063/1.4807769 ↗
44. Gong F, Liu X, Yang Y et al (2017) Nanomaterials 7:420–43110.3390/nano7120420 ↗
45. Guo Z, Zhang D, Gong X-G (2009) Appl Phys Lett 95:163103. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.324615510.1063/1.3246155 ↗
46. Nika D, Ghosh S, Pokatilov E et al (2009) Appl Phys Lett 94:203103. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.313686010.1063/1.3136860 ↗