journal article·2018-03Open access

Deformation and damage of sintered low-porosity aluminum under planar impact: microstructures and mechanisms

Y. Yao, H. W. Chai, C. Li, B. X. Bie, X. H. Xiao, J. Y. Huang, M. L. Qi, S. N. Luo

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 53· Issue 6

Abstract

Plate impact experiments are conducted to study compaction and spallation of 5% porosity aluminum. Free surface velocity histories, the Hugoniot elastic limit (HEL), and spall strengths are obtained at different peak stresses and pulse durations. Scanning electron microscopy, electron backscatter diffraction, and X-ray computed tomography are used to characterize 2D and 3D microstructures. 3D void topology analyses yield rich information on size distribution, shape, orientation, and connectivity of voids. HEL decreases/increases with sample thickness/impact velocity and approaches saturation. Its tensile strength increases with increasing peak stress and shock-induced densification. With the enhanced compaction under increasing impact velocities, spall damage modes change from growth of original voids to inter-particle crack propagation and to “random” nucleation of new voids. Such a change in damage mechanism also gives rise to a distinct decrease in damage extent at high impact velocities. Compaction induces strain localizations around the original voids, while subsequent tension results in grain refinement, and shear deformation zones between staggered cracks.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Powder Metallurgy Techniques and Materials · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. Liu YB, Lim SC, Lu L, Lai MO (1994) Recent development in the fabrication of metal matrix-particulate composites using powder metallurgy techniques. J Mater Sci 29(8):1999–2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0115467310.1007/BF01154673 ↗
2. Cavaliere P, Sadeghi B, Shabani A (2017) Carbon nanotube reinforced aluminum matrix composites produced by spark plasma sintering. J Mater Sci 52(14):8618–8629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1086-610.1007/s10853-017-1086-6 ↗
3. Wang YG, He HL, Qi ML, Shen L, Bai B (2007) Time-resolved dynamic compaction and tensile fracture of low-porosity aluminum under impact loading. J Appl Phys 102(7):07351810.1063/1.2787160 ↗
4. Victoria M, Baluc N, Bailat C, Dai Y, Luppo MI, Schaublin R, Singh BN (2000) The microstructure and associated tensile properties of irradiated fcc and bcc metals. J Nucl Mater 276(1):114–12210.1016/S0022-3115(99)00203-2 ↗
5. San Marchi C, Mortensen A (2001) Deformation of open-cell aluminum foam. Acta Mater 49(19):3959–396910.1016/S1359-6454(01)00294-4 ↗
6. Mao XH (2013) Dynamic response of the compound structure of foam aluminum core composite sandwich material to the shock wave of gas explosion. Adv Mater Res 690:1149–1157
7. Farrell K (1981) Microstructure and tensile properties of heavily irradiated 5052–0 aluminum alloy. J Nucl Mater 97(1–2):33–4310.1016/0022-3115(81)90415-3 ↗
8. Song P, Cai LC, Wang QS, Zhou XM, Li XZ, Zhang Y, Yuan S, Weng JD, Li JB (2011) Sound velocity, temperature, melting along the Hugoniot and equation of state for two porosity aluminums. J Appl Phys 110(10):10352210.1063/1.3662193 ↗
9. Wang Y, Qi M, He H, Wang L (2014) Spall failure of aluminum materials with different microstructures. Mech Mater 69(1):270–27910.1016/j.mechmat.2013.11.005 ↗
10. Kraus RG, Chapman DJ, Proud WG, Swift DC (2009) Hugoniot and spall strength measurements of porous aluminum. J Appl Phys 105(11):11491410.1063/1.3133237 ↗
11. Xiao Y, Liu H, Chen Q, Long L, Xiang J (2017) Evolution of particle breakage and volumetric deformation of binary granular soils under impact load. Granul Matter 19(4):71–8110.1007/s10035-017-0756-z ↗
12. Li C, Li B, Huang JY, Ma HH, Zhu MH, Zhu J, Luo SN (2016) Spall damage of a mild carbon steel: effects of peak stress, strain rate and pulse duration. Mater Sci Eng A 660:139–14710.1016/j.msea.2016.02.080 ↗
13. Bonnan S, Hereil PL, Collombet F (1998) Experimental characterization of quasi static and shock wave behavior of porous aluminum. J Appl Phys 83(11):5741–574910.1063/1.367430 ↗
14. Ifergane S, Barkay Z, Beeri O, Eliaz N (2010) Study of fracture evolution in copper sheets by in situ tensile test and EBSD analysis. J Mater Sci 45(23):6345–6352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-010-4596-z10.1007/s10853-010-4596-z ↗
15. Lu L, Huang JW, Fan D, Bie BX, Sun T, Fezzaa K, Gong XL, Luo SN (2016) Anisotropic deformation of extruded magnesium alloy AZ31 under uniaxial compression: a study with simultaneous in situ synchrotron X-ray imaging and diffraction. Acta Mater 120:86–9410.1016/j.actamat.2016.08.029 ↗
16. Patterson BM, Henderson K, Smith Z (2013) Measure of morphological and performance properties in polymeric silicone foams by X-ray tomography. J Mater Sci 48(5):1986–1996. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-012-6965-210.1007/s10853-012-6965-2 ↗
17. Tran H, Doumalin P, Delisee C, Dupre J, Malvestio J, Germaneau A (2013) 3D mechanical analysis of low-density wood-based fiberboards by X-ray microcomputed tomography and digital volume correlation. J Mater Sci 48(8):3198–3212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-012-7100-010.1007/s10853-012-7100-0 ↗
18. Li T, Fan D, Lu L, Huang JY, E JC, Zhao F, Qi ML, Sun T, Fezzaa K, Xiao XH, Zhou XM, Suo T, Chen W, Li YL, Zhu MH, Luo SN (2015) Dynamic fracture of C/SiC composites under high strain-rate loading: microstructures and mechanisms. Carbon 91:468–47810.1016/j.carbon.2015.05.015 ↗
19. Escobedo JP, Brown EN, Trujillo CP, Cerreta EK, Gray GT III (2013) The effect of shock-wave profile on dynamic brittle failure. J Appl Phys 113(10):10350610.1063/1.4794002 ↗
20. Xiao Y, Stuedlein A, Chen Q, Liu H, Liu P (2017) Stress-strain-strength response and ductility of gravels improved by polyurethane foam adhesive. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 10. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.000181210.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001812 ↗
21. Yang Z, Maurey A, Kang J, Wilkinson DS (2016) 2D and 3D characterization of pore defects in die cast AM60. Mater Charact 114:254–26210.1016/j.matchar.2016.02.007 ↗
22. Qi ML, Yao Y, Bie BX, Ran XX, Ye W, Fan D, Li P (2015) Nucleation and growth of damage in polycrystalline aluminum under dynamic tensile loading. AIP Adv 5(3):03711610.1063/1.4914919 ↗
23. Huang JY, Li Y, Liu QC, Zhou XM, Liu LW, Liu CL, Zhu MH, Luo SN (2015) Origin of compression-induced failure in brittle solids under shock loading. Phys Rev B 92(14):14410110.1103/PhysRevB.92.144101 ↗
24. Strand OT, Goosman D, Martinez C, Whitworth T, Kuhlow W (2006) Compact system for high-speed velocimetry using heterodyne techniques. Rev Sci Instrum 77(8):08310810.1063/1.2336749 ↗
25. Arman B, Luo SN, Germann T, Cagin T (2010) Dynamic response of Cu $$46$$ 46 Zr $$54$$ 54 metallic glass to high-strain-rate shock loading: plasticity, spall, and atomic-level structures. Phys Rev B 81(14):14420110.1103/PhysRevB.81.144201 ↗
26. Antoun T, Curran DR, Razorenov SV, Seaman L, Kanel GI, Utkin AV (2003) Spall fracture. Springer, New York
27. Luo SN, An Q, Germann TC, Han LB (2009) Shock-induced spall in solid and liquid Cu at extreme strain rates. J Appl Phys 106(1):01350210.1063/1.3158062 ↗
28. Kanel GI, Razorenov SV, Bogatch A, Utkin AV, Grady DE (1997) Simulation of spall fracture of aluminum and magnesium over a wide range of load duration and temperature. Int J Impact Eng 20(6):467–47810.1016/S0734-743X(97)87435-0 ↗
29. Arvidsson TE, Gupta YM, Duvall GE (1975) Precursor decay in 1060 aluminum. J Appl Phys 46(10):4474–447810.1063/1.321423 ↗
30. Wang YG, He HL, Wang LL (2010) Experimental investigation of precursor decay in shock compressed mild steel by the VISAR interferometry technique. Strain 46(3):298–30110.1111/j.1475-1305.2008.00473.x ↗
31. Adams CD, Anderson WW, Blumenthal WR, Gray GT III (2014) Elastic precursor decay in S-200F beryllium. In: Journal of physics: conference series, vol 500, p 11200110.1088/1742-6596/500/11/112001 ↗
32. Whitley VH, McGrane SD, Eakins DE, Bolme CA, Moore DS, Bingert JF (2011) The elastic-plastic response of aluminum films to ultrafast laser-generated shocks. J Appl Phys 109(1):01350510.1063/1.3506696 ↗
33. Huang H, Asay JR (2005) Compressive strength measurements in aluminum for shock compression over the stress range of 4–22 GPa. J Appl Phys 98(3):03352410.1063/1.2001729 ↗
34. Qi ML, He HL, Yan SL (2007) Measurement and analysis of spall characteristics of high-pure aluminium at one-dimensional strain loading. Chin Phys Lett 24(8):2338–234010.1088/0256-307X/24/8/050 ↗
35. Stevens AL, Tuler FR (1972) Effect of shock precompression on the dynamic fracture strength of 1020 steel and 6061 T6 aluminum. J Appl Phys 42(13):5665–567010.1063/1.1659997 ↗
36. Zhao FP, Li B, Jian WR, Wang L, Luo SN (2015) Shock-induced melting of honeycomb-shaped Cu nanofoams: effects of porosity. J Appl Phys 118(3):03590410.1063/1.4926785 ↗
37. Jian WR, Li B, Wang L, Yao XH, Luo SN (2015) Shock response of open-cell nanoporous Cu foams: effects of porosity and specific surface area. J Appl Phys 118(16):16590210.1063/1.4934244 ↗
38. Brown AD, Pham Q, Peralta P, Luo SN, Patterson BM, Byler D, Koskelo A, Xiao X (2015) Correlations between spall damage mode preference and microstructure in shocked polycrystalline copper: a 3-D X-ray tomography study. J Dyn Behav Mater 1(4):388–39610.1007/s40870-015-0034-2 ↗
39. Bontaz-Carion J, Pellegrini Y-P (2006) X-ray microtomography analysis of dynamic damage in tantalum. Adv Eng Mater 8(6):480–48610.1002/adem.200600058 ↗
40. Soulard L, Bontaz-Carion J, Cuq-Lelandais JP (2012) Experimental and numerical study of the tantalum single crystal spallation. Eur Phys J B 85(10):1–1510.1140/epjb/e2012-30269-9 ↗
41. Hartley K, Duffy J, Hawley R (1987) Measurement of the temperature profile during shear band formation in steels deforming at high strain rates. J Mech Phys Solids 35(3):283–30110.1016/0022-5096(87)90009-3 ↗
42. Xue Q, Meyers MA, Nesterenko VF (2002) Self-organization of shear bands in titanium and Ti–6Al–4V alloy. Acta Mater 50(3):575–59610.1016/S1359-6454(01)00356-1 ↗
43. Packard C, Schuh C (2007) Initiation of shear bands near a stress concentration in metallic glass. Acta Mater 55(16):5348–535810.1016/j.actamat.2007.05.054 ↗
44. Traiviratana S, Bringa EM, Benson DJ, Meyers MA (2008) Void growth in metals: atomistic calculations. Acta Mater 56(15):3874–388610.1016/j.actamat.2008.03.047 ↗
45. Kim D-K, Lee S, Noh J-W (1998) Dynamic and quasi-static torsional behavior of tungsten heavy alloy specimens fabricated through sintering, heat-treatment, swaging and aging. Mater Sci Eng A 247(1):285–29410.1016/S0921-5093(97)00547-9 ↗
46. Kovalčíková A, Dusza J, Šajgalík P (2009) Thermal shock resistance and fracture toughness of liquid-phase-sintered SiC-based ceramics. J Eur Cerm Soc 29(11):2387–239410.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2009.01.021 ↗