Understanding the ballistic event: methodology and initial observations
Source abstract
Abstract
The purpose of the study is to accelerate the development of ceramic materials for armour applications by substantially increasing the information obtained from a high-energy projectile impact event. This has been achieved by modifying an existing test configuration to incorporate a block of ballistic gel, attached to the strike face of a ceramic armour system, to capture fragments generated during the ballistic event such that their final positions are maintained. Three different materials, representative of the major classes of ceramics for armour applications, alumina, silicon carbide, and boron carbide, have been tested using this system. Ring-on-ring biaxial disc testing has also been carried out on the same materials. Qualitative analysis of the fracture surfaces using scanning electron microscopy and surface roughness quantification, via stereo imaging, has shown that the fracture surfaces of biaxial fragments and ballistic fragments recovered from the edges of the tile are indistinguishable. Although the alumina and boron carbide fragments generated from areas closer to the point of impact were also similar, the silicon carbide fragments showed an increase in porosity with respect to the fragments from further away and from biaxial testing. This porosity was found to result from the loss of a boron-rich second phase, which was widespread elsewhere in the material, although the relevance of this to ballistic performance needs further investigation. The technique developed in this work will help facilitate such studies.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · High-pressure geophysics and materials · Energetic Materials and Combustion
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Medvedovski E (2010) Ballistic performance of armour ceramics: influence of design and structure, part I. Ceram Int 36(7):2103–211510.1016/j.ceramint.2010.05.021 ↗
2. Karandikar PG, Evans G, Wong S, Aghajanian MK (2008) A review of ceramics for armour applications. Ceram Eng Sci Proc 29(6):163–17510.1002/9780470456286.ch16 ↗
3. Woodward RL, Gooch WA, O’Donnell RG, Perciballi WJ, Baxter BJ, Pattie SD (1994) A study of fragmentation in the ballistic impact of ceramics. Int J Impact Eng 15(5):605–61810.1016/0734-743X(94)90122-2 ↗
4. Lankford J (1981) Temperature-strain rate dependence of compressive strength and damage mechanisms in aluminium oxide. J Mat Sci 16(6):1567–157810.1007/BF02396874 ↗
5. Krell A, Strassburger E (2007) Hierarchy of key influences on the ballistic strength of opaque and transparent armour. Ceram Eng Sci Proc 28(5):45–55
6. O’Donnell RG (1993) Deformation energy of Kevlar backing plates for ceramic armours. J Mater Sci Lett 12(18):1485–148610.1007/BF00591616 ↗
7. Kneubuehl BP (1996) Improved test procedure for body armour; statistical base and evaluation program, Proc PASS96, Colchester
8. Gotts PL, Fenne PM, Leeming DW (2004) The application of critical perforation analysis to UK military and police body armour, Proc PASS04, The Hague
9. Krell A, Strassburger E (2012) Discrimination of basic influences on the ballistic strength of opaque and transparent ceramics. Ceram Eng Sci Proc 33(5):161–17610.1002/9781118217498.ch15 ↗
10. Wu H, Ghosh S, Dancer C, Todd R (2014) Ballistic damage of alumina ceramics—learning from fragments. Ceram Eng Sci Proc 35(4):49–6210.1002/9781119040590.ch5 ↗
11. Tan ZH, Han X, Zhang W, Luo SH (2010) An investigation on failure mechanisms of ceramic/metal armour subjected to the impact of tungsten projectile. Int J Impact Eng 37(12):1162–116910.1016/j.ijimpeng.2010.07.004 ↗
12. Sherman D (2000) Impact failure mechanisms in alumina tiles on finite thickness support and the effect of confinement. Int J Impact Eng 24(3):313–32810.1016/S0734-743X(99)00147-5 ↗
13. Ernst CM, Barnouin-Jha OS, Ramesh KT, Swaminathan PK, Kimberley J (2009) Strain rate and dynamic fracturing in planetary-scale impacts. In: 40th lunar and planetary science conference, Texas
14. Morgan Advanced Materials (2013) Sintox FA Ballistic data sheet. http://www.morgantechnicalceramics.com/media/2328/rugby-sintox-fa-ballistic.pdf . Accessed 19 Aug 2016
15. Saint-Gobain (2012) Hexoloy SA data sheet. http://www.refractories.saint-gobain.com/hexoloy/hexoloy-sic-materials . Accessed 19 July 2016
16. 3 M (2015) B4C data sheet. http://technical-ceramics.3mdeutschland.de/en/products/3m-ballistic-ceramics.html#c509 . Accessed 19 July 2016
17. Morrell R (2008) Fractography and fracture toughness measurement. Key Engin Mater 409:17–2710.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.409.17 ↗
18. Salem JA (2009) Fracture toughness of thin plates by double-torsion test method. Ceram Engin Sci Proc 27(2):63–73
19. Thévenot F (1990) Boron carbide—a comprehensive review. J Euro Ceram Soc 6:205–22510.1016/0955-2219(90)90048-K ↗
20. Kecskes LJ, Magness LS (2007) Recovery apparatus for fragmented ballistic materials and method for collection of the same, Patent number US 7,163,205, Washington, DC
21. Strassburger E, Hunzinger M, Patel P, McCauley JW (2013) Analysis of the fragmentation of AlON and spinel under ballistic impact. J Appl Mech 80(3):03180710.1115/1.4023573 ↗
22. Wereszcak A, Swab JJ, Kraft RH (2005) Effects of machining on the uniaxial and equibiaxial flexure strength of CAP3 AD-995 Al2O3. Army Research Laboratory, Adelphi
23. Morrell R (2007) Measurement good practise Guide No.12—biaxial flexural strength testing of ceramic materials, NPL Guide
24. Lankford J, Blanchard CR (1991) Fragmentation of brittle materials at high rates of loading. J Mater Sci 26(11):3067–3072. doi: 10.1007/BF0112484410.1007/BF01124844 ↗
25. Hull D (1999) Fractography: observing, measuring and interpreting fracture surface topography. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 124
26. MoberlyChan WJ, Cao JJ, Gilbert CJ, Ritchie RO, De Jonghe LC (1998) The cubic-to-hexagonal transformation to toughen SiC. Ceramic Microstructures, pp. 177–19010.1007/978-1-4615-5393-9_15 ↗
27. Horsfall I, Edwards MR, Hallas MJ (2010) Ballistic and physical properties of highly fractured alumina, Staff Publications—Cranfield Defence and Security, London10.1179/174367610X12804792635341 ↗
28. Gàlvez F, Rodríguez J, Gàlvez VS (1997) Influence of the strain rate on the tensile strength in aluminas of different purity. J Phys IV 10(9):323–328
29. Belenky A, Rittel D (2012) Static and dynamic flexural strength of 99.5% alumina: relation to surface roughness. Mech Mater 54:91–9910.1016/j.mechmat.2012.07.003 ↗
30. Ischenko V, Jang YS, Kormann M, Greil P, Popovska N, Zollfrank C, Woltersdorf J (2011) The effect of SiC substrate microstructure and impurities on the phase formation in carbide-derived carbon. Carbon 49:1189–119810.1016/j.carbon.2010.11.035 ↗
31. Elliot S (2007) Silicon carbide ceramic armour. AM&P Mag 165(10):29–30