Fracture strength of ion-exchange silicate-containing dental glass ceramics
Source abstract
Abstract
Dental glass ceramics with the composition of (0.2K, 0.8Na)2O–xAl2O3–ySiO2 (x = 0.4–0.8, y = 4–6) were studied for their mechanical properties. Different ion-exchange practices were used to modify the sub-surface concentration distributions of K+, Na+, and H+ of these glass ceramics. Specimens were heat-treated in molten KNO3, and NaNO3 + KNO3 salt baths at 350–450 °C for the ion exchanges of K+ and Na+, or in the 4% acetic aqueous solution at 85 °C for a hydration treatment. Some glass ceramics contained a feldspar crystalline phase, which was not affected by different ion-exchange practices. Specimens with a single ion-exchange process or with the hydration treatment had higher flexural strength than those without either of these two treatments. For double ion-exchange specimens, the flexural strength increased with decreasing ion-exchange temperature. The double ion-exchange specimens had flexural strength up to 280 MPa, which was slightly lower than that of the single ion-exchange specimens, but much higher than that of the as-annealed specimens. However, the Weibull modulus of these double ion-exchange specimens was 5–8 because of the presence of large defects. For further increasing mechanical reliability, silicate-containing dental glass ceramics were required to have appropriate flaw controls and ion-exchange processes.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nuclear materials and radiation effects · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. McLean JW (1982) In: McLean JW (ed) Dental ceramics: proceedings of the first international symposium on ceramics, April 1982. Quintessence, Chicago, IL, pp 13–40
2. Jones DW (1985) Dent Clin N Am 29:62110.2208/prohe1975.29.621 ↗
3. O’Brien WJ (1985) J Am Dent Assoc 110:54810.14219/jada.archive.1985.0365 ↗
4. Grossmann DG (1985) In: O’Brien WJ, Craig RG (eds) Proceedings of conference on recent developments in dental ceramics, Ann Arbor, October 1983. Ceramic Engineering and Science Proceedings, American Ceramics Society, Columbus, OH, pp 19–40
5. Rouf MA, Hermansson L, Carlsson R (1978) Br Ceram Trans J 77:36
6. Morena R, Lockwood PE, Evans AL, Fairhurst CW (1986) J Am Ceram Soc 69:C-7510.1111/j.1151-2916.1986.tb04756.x ↗
7. Green DJ, Tandon R, Sglavo VM (1999) Science 283:129510.1126/science.283.5406.1295 ↗
8. Green DJ (1999) Z Metallkd 90:059
9. Sglavo VM, Larentis L, Green DJ (2001) J Am Ceram Soc 84:82710.1111/j.1151-2916.2001.tb00748.x ↗
10. Sglavo VM, Green DJ (2001) J Am Ceram Soc 84:832
11. Anusavice KJ, Shen C, Lee RB (1992) J Dent Res 71:13410.1177/00220345920710050101 ↗
12. Sheu TS, O’Brien WJ, Rasmussen ST, Tien TY (1994) J Mater Sci 29:12510.1007/BF00356582 ↗
13. Fischer H, Maier HR, Marx R (2000) Dent Mater l6:20
14. Sheu TS, Ou CJ, Hon LY, Chen DY (2000) Proc Natl Sci Counc ROC (A) 24 (4):1
15. Denry IL, Rosebstiel SF, Holloway JA, Niemiec MS (1993) J Dent Res 72:142910.1177/00220345930720101301 ↗
16. Fisher H, Marx R (2001) J Dent Res 80:33610.1177/00220345010800010701 ↗
17. Fisher H, Marx R (2003) J Biomed Mater Res 66A:88510.1002/jbm.a.10051 ↗
18. Scholze H (1991) In: Glass nature, structure, and properties, translated by MJ Lakin. Springler-Verlag, New York, pp 135–137
19. Griggs JA, Kishen A, Le KN (2003) Mechanism of strength for a hydrothermal porcelain. Dent Mater 19:625