Shock behaviour of a phenolic resin
Source abstract
Abstract
Phenolic resins are used in many aspects of everyday life, e.g. as the matrix material for carbon fibre laminates used in the aerospace industry. Consequently, detailed knowledge of this material, especially while under shock loading, is extremely useful for the design of components that could be subjected to impact during their lifespan. The shock Hugoniot equations of state for phenolic resin (Durite SC-1008), with initial density of 1.18 g cm−3 have been determined using the plate-impact technique with in situ manganin stress gauges. The Hugoniot equation in the shock velocity–particle velocity plane was found to be non-linear in nature with the following equation: US = 2.14 + 3.79up − 1.68up2. Further, the Hugoniot in the pressure–volume plane was observed to largely follow the hydrostatic curve. Lateral gauge measurements were also obtained. An ANSYS AutodynTM 2D model was used to investigate the lateral stress behaviour of the SC-1008. A comparison of the Hugoniot elastic limit calculated from the shear strength and measured sound speeds gave reasonable agreement with a value of 0.66 ± 0.35 GPa obtained.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High-pressure geophysics and materials · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Energetic Materials and Combustion
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Cowie JMG (1991) Polymers: chemistry and physics of modern materials. Blackie, Glasgow, p 17
2. Burrell RH, Barnes NK, Keightley PT, Millett JCF, Bourne NK (2009) In: Americian Physical Society, 16th APS conference, poster presentation
3. Fujiwara S (1992) In: Sawaoka AB (ed) Shock compression technology and material science. KTK Scientific Publisher, Tokyo, p 7
4. Boustie M, Berthe L, de Resseguier T, Arrigoni M (2008) In: 1st International symposium on laser ultrasonics: science, technology and applications
5. Bourne NK (2003) Meas Sci Technol 14:27310.1088/0957-0233/14/3/304 ↗
6. Meyers MA (1994) Dynamic behavior of materials. Wiley-Interscience Publication, New York, p 11610.1002/9780470172278 ↗
7. Barker LM, Hollenbach RE (1970) J Appl Phys 41:420810.1063/1.1658439 ↗
8. Carter WJ, Marsh SP (1995) Hugoniot equation of state of polymers. Report LA-13006-MS. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos
9. Porter D, Gould PJ (2009) Int J Solids Struct 46:198110.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.01.012 ↗
10. Munson DE, May RP (1972) J Appl Phys 43:96210.1063/1.1661315 ↗
11. Hazell PJ, Stennett C, Cooper G (2008) Polym Comp 29:110610.1002/pc.20614 ↗
12. Appleby-Thomas G, Hazell P, Stennett C (2009) J Mater Sci 44:6187. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-009-3859-z10.1007/s10853-009-3859-z ↗
13. Millett JCF, Bourne NK, Deas D (2005) J Phys D 38:93010.1088/0022-3727/38/6/023 ↗
14. Marsh SP (1980) LASL shock hugoniot data. University of California Press, California
15. Stennett C, Cooper GA, Hazell PJ, Appleby-Thomas GJ (2009) In: Proceedings of the American Physical Society Topical Group on shock compression of condensed matter, 2009, American Institute of Physics, Melville, p 267
16. Volger TJ, Chhabildasa LC (2006) Int J Imp Eng 33:81210.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.09.069 ↗
17. Rosenberg Z, Yaziv D, Partom Y (1980) J Appl Phys 51:370210.1063/1.328155 ↗
18. Rosenberg Z, Brar NS (1995) J Appl Phys 77:144310.1063/1.358891 ↗
19. Rosenberg Z, Partom Y (1985) Lateral stress measurement in shock-loaded targets with transverse piezoresistance gauges. J Appl Phys 58:307210.1063/1.335833 ↗
20. Millett JCF, Bourne NK, Rosenberg Z (1996) J Phys D 29:246610.1088/0022-3727/29/9/035 ↗
21. Van Den Berg P, De Borst R, Hutink H (1996) J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 20:86510.1002/(SICI)1096-9853(199612)20:12<865::AID-NAG854>3.0.CO;2-A ↗
22. Appleby-Thomas GJ, Hazell PJ, Stennett C, Cooper G, Cleave R (2009) In: DYMAT 2009, 9th International conference on the mechanical and physical behaviour of materials under dynamic loading, vol 2, p 108110.1051/dymat/2009151 ↗
23. Millett J, Bourne N (2006) J Mater Sci 41:1683. doi: 10.1007/s10853-006-3951-610.1007/s10853-006-3951-6 ↗
24. Millett JCF, Bourne NK (2004) J Phys D Appl Phys 37:290110.1088/0022-3727/37/20/018 ↗
25. Park SW, Xia Q, Zhou M (2001) Int J Imp Eng 25:88710.1016/S0734-743X(01)00021-5 ↗
26. Tham CY (2005) Finite Elem Anal Des 41:140110.1016/j.finel.2004.08.003 ↗
27. Ma GW, Hao H, Zhou YX (1998) Comp Geotech 22:28310.1016/S0266-352X(98)00011-1 ↗
28. Winter RE, Harris EJ (2003) J Phys D 41:03550310.1088/0022-3727/41/3/035503 ↗
29. Winter RE, Owen GD, Harris EJ (2008) J Phys D 41:20200610.1088/0022-3727/41/20/202006 ↗
30. Appleby-Thomas GJ, Hazell PJ, Wilgeroth JM, Wood DC (2010) J Appl Phys 108:03352410.1063/1.3460812 ↗
31. Rosenberg Z, Partom Y (1994) J Appl Phys 76:193510.1063/1.357680 ↗
32. Millett JCF, Bourne NK, Barnes NK (2002) J Appl Phys 92:659010.1063/1.1506389 ↗
33. Bourne NK, Millett JCF, Goveas SG (2007) J Phys D 40:571410.1088/0022-3727/40/18/030 ↗
34. Millett JCF, Bourne NK, Gray III GT, Cooper G (2002) In: Shock compression of condensed matter 2001, 12th APS topical conference, American Institute of Physics, Melville, p 131
35. Millett JCF, Bourne NK, Gray III GT (2004) J Phys D 37:94210.1088/0022-3727/37/6/021 ↗
36. Pickup IM, Millett JCF, Bourne NK (2004) In: Shock compression of condensed matter 2003, proceedings of the conference of the American Physical Society Topical Group, American Institute of Physics, Melville, p 751
37. Ragford DD (2005) J Appl Phys 98:06350410.1063/1.2041840 ↗
38. Appleby-Thomas GJ, Hazell PJ (2010) J Appl Phys 107:12350810.1063/1.3431346 ↗
39. Bourne NK, Millett JCF (2003) Proc R Soc London Ser A 459:59710.1098/rspa.2002.1033 ↗