Processing and properties of bulk ultrafine-grained pure niobium
Source abstract
Abstract
An ultrafine-grained (UFG) microstructure in electron beam-melted casts of commercial pure niobium (Nb) was produced in an equal-channel angular pressing die with a right angle, without roundings, at 12 passes, and by the Bc route. Additional microstructural improvements were made by hard cyclic viscoplastic deformation and the double-bounded microstructure was formed. The new nanoindentation technique was used to study the pure Nb micro-mechanical properties of the shear bands (SBs). The wear resistance of Nb was studied by a ball-on-plate tribometer with an alumina (Al2O3) counterface ball. The results showed that the nanohardness of pure Nb on boundaries of SBs was ~6 GPa, while inside of SBs, it was only ~3.5 GPa (measured under an indentation load of 10 mN). The corresponding elastic modules were ~150 and ~100 GPa, respectively. Such heterogeneity of the micromechanical properties has an influence on the coefficient of friction (COF) and the wear rate. The Nb with an UFG microstructure has an increased COF and a higher specific wear rate as compared to the as-cast sample. The COF depends on the direction of the wear test relative to the SBs’ orientation. As the boundaries of SBs have the highest hardness, compared to areas inside of SBs, the wear track surface has a high roughness, which leads to an increase in the COF of the double-banded ultrafine-rained pure Nb.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Advanced materials and composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Reed RC (2006) The superalloys. Fundamentals and applications. Cambridge University Press, New York10.1017/CBO9780511541285 ↗
2. Grinberg BA, Ivanov MA (2002) The intermetallides Ni3Al and TiAl. Microstructure and deformation behavior. Ekaterinburg, Russia, UDK 548.4.001: 669.24571 (in Russian)
3. Heisterkamp F, Carneiro T (2001) Niobium science and technology: proceedings of the international symposium niobium 2001, Orlando, FL, USA. Niobium 2001 Ltd, 2002. ISBN: 9780971206809. http://www.cbmm.com.br/portug/sources/techlib/science_techno/table_content/images/pdfs/closing.pdf
4. Zeng-Hui L, Jia-Xiang S (2012) Chin Phys B 21-1:016202-1. doi: 10.1088/1674-1056/21/1/016202
5. Lindenhovius JLH, Hornsveld EM, Den Ouden A, Wessel WAJ, Ten Kate HHJ (2000) IEEE Trans Appl Supercond 10:975. doi: 10.1109/77.82839410.1109/77.828394 ↗
6. Nave CR (2008) Superconducting magnets. Georgia State University, Department of Physics and Astronomy. http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/solids/scmag.html
7. Mathaudhu SN, Blum S, Barber RE, Hartwig KT (2005) IEEE Trans Appl Supercond 15(2):343810.1109/TASC.2005.849044 ↗
8. Grill R, Gnadenberge A (2006) Int J Refr Met Hard Mater 24(4):275. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2005.10.00810.1016/j.ijrmhm.2005.10.008 ↗
9. Nikulina AV (2003) Met Sci Heat Treat 45:287. doi: 10.1023/A102738850383710.1023/A:1027388503837 ↗
10. Lide DR (2004) The elements. CRC handbook of chemistry and physics, 85th edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, p 4. ISBN 978-0-8493-0485-9
11. Kommel L (2008) Mater Sci Forum 584–586:34910.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.584-586.349 ↗
12. Kommel L (2008) Mater Sci (Medžiagotyra) 14:319
13. Kommel L (2004) Rev Adv Mater Sci 10:442
14. Kommel L, Veinthal R (2005) Rev Adv Mater Sci 10:442
15. Kommel L, Mikli V, Traksmaa R, Saarna M, Pokatilov A, Pikker S, Kommel I (2011) Mater Sci Forum 667–669:785. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.667-669.785
16. Li WL, Tao NR, Han Z, Lu K (2012) Wear 274–275:306. doi: 10.1016/j.wear.2011.09.010
17. El Aal MIA, El Mahallawy N, Shehata FA, El Hameed MA, Yoon EY, Kim HS (2010) Mater Sci Eng A527:3726. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2010.03.05710.1016/j.msea.2010.03.057 ↗
18. Purcek G, Saray O, Kul O, Karaman I, Yapici GG, Haouaoui M, Maier HJ (2009) Mater Sci Eng A517:97. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2009.03.05410.1016/j.msea.2009.03.054 ↗
19. Wang CT, Gao N, Gee MG, Wood RJK, Langdon TG (2012) Wear 280–281:28. doi: 10.016/j.wear.2012.01.01210.1016/j.wear.2012.01.012 ↗
20. La PQ, Ma JQ, Zhu YT, Yang J, Liu WM, Xue QJ, Valiev RZ (2005) Acta Mater 53:5167. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2005.07.03110.1016/j.actamat.2005.07.031 ↗
21. Stolyarov VV, Shuster LS, Migranov MS, Valiev RZ, Zhu YT (2004) Mater Sci Eng A371:313. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2003.12.02610.1016/j.msea.2003.12.026 ↗
22. Michalczewski R, Piekoszewski W, Szczerek M, Tuszynski W (2002) Tribotest J 9(117):117. ISSN: 1354-4063
23. Mathieu JP, Suwas S, Eberhardt A, Toth LS, Moll P (2006) J Mater Proc Technol 173:29. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.11.00710.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.11.007 ↗
24. Sandim HRZ, Bernardi HH, Verlinden B, Raabe D (2007) Mater Sci Eng A467:44. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2007.02.08610.1016/j.msea.2007.02.086 ↗
25. http://www.micromaterials.co.uk/Hardness_Scale_Conversio.asp
26. Kommel L, Saarna M, Traksmaa R, Kommel I (2012) Mater Sci (Medžiagotyra) 18-4:330
27. Shen TD, Zhang J, Zhao Y (2008) Acta Mater 56:366310.1016/j.actamat.2008.04.003 ↗
28. Zhu YT, Wu XL, Liao XZ, Narayan J, Mathaudhu SN, Kecskes LJ (2009) Appl Phys Lett 95:031909. doi: 10.1063/1.318753910.1063/1.3187539 ↗
29. Wang YB, Ho JC, Cao Y, Liao XZ, Li HQ, Zhao YH, Lavernia EJ, Ringer SP, Zhu YT (2009) Appl Phys Lett 94:091911. doi: 10.1063/1.309585210.1063/1.3095852 ↗
30. Wu XL, Zhu YT, Wei YG, Wei Q (2009) Phys Rev Lett 103:205504. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.20550410.1103/PhysRevLett.103.205504 ↗
31. Narayan J, Zhu YT (2008) Appl Phys Lett 92:15190810.1063/1.2911735 ↗