journal article·2022-03Open access

Formation of pure $$\tau$$-phase in Mn–Al–C by fast annealing using spark plasma sintering

F. Maccari, A. Aubert, S. Ener, E. Bruder, I. Radulov, K. Skokov, O. Gutfleisch

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 57· Issue 10

Abstract

Abstract Mn–Al–C is intended to be one of the “gap magnets” with magnetic performance in-between ferrites and Nd-Fe-B. These magnets are based on the metastable ferromagnetic $$\tau$$-phase with L1$$_0$$ structure, which requires well controlled synthesis to prevent the formation of secondary phases, detrimental for magnetic properties. Here, we investigate the formation of $$\tau$$-phase in Mn–Al–C using Spark Plasma Sintering (SPS) and compare with conventional annealing. The effect of SPS parameters (pressure and electric current) on the phase formation is also studied. Single $$\tau$$-phase is obtained for annealing 5 min at $$500~^\circ \hbox {C}$$ with SPS. In addition, we show that the initial grain size of the $$\epsilon$$-phase is influencing the $$\tau$$-phase transformation and fraction at a given annealing condition, independently of the annealing method used. A faster transformation was observed for smaller initial $$\epsilon$$-grains. The samples obtained by SPS showed comparable magnetic properties with the conventional annealed ones, reaching coercivity of 0.18 T and saturation magnetization of 114 Am$$^2$$/kg in the optimized samples. The similarity in coercivity is related to the microstructure, as we reveal the presence of structure defects like twin boundaries and dislocations in both materials. Graphical abstract
Source: crossref · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic Properties of Alloys · Heusler alloys: electronic and magnetic properties · Rare-earth and actinide compounds

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. Koch AJJ, Hokkeling P, vd Steeg MG, de Vos KJ (1960) New material for permanent magnets on a base of Mn and Al. J Appl Phys 31(5):75–77. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.198461010.1063/1.1984610 ↗
2. Ohtani T, Kato N, Kojima S, Kojima K, Sakamoto Y, Konno I, Tsukahara M, Kubo T (1977) Magnetic properties of Mn–Al–C permanent magnet alloys. IEEE Trans Magn 13(5):1328–1330. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmag.1977.105957410.1109/tmag.1977.1059574 ↗
3. Cui J, Kramer M, Zhou L, Liu F, Gabay A, Hadjipanayis G, Balasubramanian B, Sellmyer D (2018) Current progress and future challenges in rare-earth-free permanent magnets. Acta Mater 158:118–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2018.07.04910.1016/j.actamat.2018.07.049 ↗
4. Skokov KP, Gutfleisch O (2018) Heavy rare earth free, free rare earth and rare earth free magnets - Vision and reality. Scripta Mater 154:289–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.01.03210.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.01.032 ↗
5. Coey JMD (2012) Permanent magnets: plugging the gap. Scripta Mater 67(6):524–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.04.03610.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.04.036 ↗
6. Park J, Hong Y, Bae S, Lee J, Jalli J, Abo G, Neveu N, Kim S, Choi C, Lee J (2010) Saturation magnetization and crystalline anisotropy calculations for MnAl permanent magnet. J Appl Phys 107(9):09–731. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.333764010.1063/1.3337640 ↗
7. Palanisamy D, Singh S, Srivastava C, Madras G, Chattopadhyay K (2016) Predicting pathways for synthesis of ferromagnetic $$\tau$$ phase in binary Heusler alloy Al-55 pct Mn through understanding of the kinetics of $$\varepsilon$$-$$\tau$$ transformation. Metall Mater Trans A 47(12):6555–6568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-016-3756-410.1007/s11661-016-3756-4 ↗
8. Keller T, Baker I (2022) Manganese-based permanent magnet materials. Prog Mater Sci 124:100872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2021.10087210.1016/j.pmatsci.2021.100872 ↗
9. Bittner F, Schultz L, Woodcock TG (2017) The role of the interface distribution in the decomposition of metastable L1$$0$$-Mn$$54$$Al$$46$$. J Alloys Compd 727:1095–1099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.08.19710.1016/j.jallcom.2017.08.197 ↗
10. Xiang Z, Deng Baiwen, Zhang X, Wang X, Cui E, Yu L, Song Y, Lu W (2020) Nanocrystalline MnAlV rare-earth-free permanent magnetic alloys with improved magnetization and thermal stability. Intermetallics 116:106638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intermet.2019.10663810.1016/j.intermet.2019.106638 ↗
11. Bittner F, Freudenberger J, Schultz L, Woodcock TG (2017) The impact of dislocations on coercivity in L1$$0$$-MnAl. J Alloys Compd 704:528–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.02.02810.1016/j.jallcom.2017.02.028 ↗
12. Øygarden V, Rial J, Bollero A, Deledda S (2019) Phase-pure $$\tau$$-MnAlC produced by mechanical alloying and a one-step annealing route. J Alloys Compd 779:776–783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.11.17510.1016/j.jallcom.2018.11.175 ↗
13. Popov VV, Maccari F, Radulov IA, Kovalevsky A, Katz-Demyanetz A, Bamberger M (2021) Microstructure and magnetic properties of Mn–Al–C permanent magnets produced by various techniques. Manufact Rev 8:10. https://doi.org/10.1051/mfreview/202100810.1051/mfreview/2021008 ↗
14. Si P-Z, Qian H-D, Choi C-J, Park J, Han S, Ge H-L, Shinde KP (2017) In situ observation of phase transformation in MnAl(C) magnetic materials. Materials 10(9):1016. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1009101610.3390/ma10091016 ↗
15. Zhang C, Zhang T, Wang J, Zhao S, Wu Y, Jiang C (2018) Anisotropic single-variant of (Mn$$54$$Al$$46$$)97C$$_3$$. Scripta Materialia 143:72–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.09.00810.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.09.008 ↗
16. Palanisamy D, Raabe D, Gault B (2019) On the compositional partitioning during phase transformation in a binary ferromagnetic MnAl alloy. Acta Mater 174:227–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2019.05.03710.1016/j.actamat.2019.05.037 ↗
17. McCallum RW, Lewis L, Skomski R, Kramer MJ, Anderson IE (2014) Practical aspects of modern and future permanent magnets. Annu Rev Mater Sci 44(1):451–477. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-matsci-070813-11345710.1146/annurev-matsci-070813-113457 ↗
18. Zhao S, Wu Y, Zhang C, Wang J, Fu Z, Zhang R, Jiang C (2018) Stabilization of $$\tau$$-phase in carbon-doped MnAl magnetic alloys. J Alloys Compd 755:257–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.04.31810.1016/j.jallcom.2018.04.318 ↗
19. Aubert A, Loyau V, Mazaleyrat F, LoBue M (2017) Uniaxial anisotropy and enhanced magnetostriction of CoFe$$_2$$O$$_4$$ induced by reaction under uniaxial pressure with SPS. J Eur Ceram Soc 37(9):3101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.03.03610.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.03.036 ↗
20. Guillon O, Elsässer C, Gutfleisch O, Janek J, Korte-Kerzel S, Raabe D, Volkert CA (2018) Manipulation of matter by electric and magnetic fields: toward novel synthesis and processing routes of inorganic materials. Mater Today 21(5):527–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2018.03.02610.1016/j.mattod.2018.03.026 ↗
21. Maccari F, Karpenkov DY, Semenova E, Karpenkov AY, Radulov IA, Skokov KP, Gutfleisch O (2020) Accelerated crystallization and phase formation in Fe$$40$$Ni$$40$$B$$20$$ by electric current assisted annealing technique. J Alloys Compd 836:155338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15533810.1016/j.jallcom.2020.155338 ↗
22. Wang H, Kou R, Harrington T, Vecchio KS (2020) Electromigration effect in Fe-Al diffusion couples with field-assisted sintering. Acta Mater 186:631–643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2020.01.00810.1016/j.actamat.2020.01.008 ↗
23. Tyrman M, Quetel-Weben S, Pasko A, Perrière L, Guillot I, Etgens V, Mazaleyrat F (2017) Ferromagnetic L1$$0$$ phase formation in the Mn–Al–C alloys induced by high-pressure spark plasma sintering. IEEE Trans Magn 53(11):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2017.273250010.1109/TMAG.2017.2732500 ↗
24. Tyrman M, Ahmim S, Pasko A, Etgens V, Mazaleyrat F, Quetel-Weben S, Perrière L, Guillot I (2018) Anisotropy of the ferromagnetic L1$$0$$ phase in the Mn–Al–C alloys induced by high-pressure spark plasma sintering. AIP Adv 8(5):056217. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.500724110.1063/1.5007241 ↗
25. Gorynski C, Anselmi-Tamburini U, Winterer M (2020) Controlling current flow in sintering: a facile method coupling flash with spark plasma sintering. Rev Sci Instrum 91(1):015112. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.511905910.1063/1.5119059 ↗
26. Rodríguez-Carvajal J (1993) Recent advances in magnetic structure determination by neutron powder diffraction. Physica B Condens Matter 192(1–2):55–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-4526(93)90108-i10.1016/0921-4526(93)90108-i ↗
27. Jian H, Skokov KP, Gutfleisch O (2015) Microstructure and magnetic properties of Mn–Al–C alloy powders prepared by ball milling. J Alloys Compounds 622:524–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.10.13810.1016/j.jallcom.2014.10.138 ↗
28. Zhao S, Wu Y, Jiao Z, Jia Y, Xu Y, Wang J, Zhang T, Jiang C (2019) Evolution of intrinsic magnetic properties in L1$$0$$ Mn–Al alloys doped with substitutional atoms and correlated mechanism: experimental and theoretical studies. Phys Rev Appl 11(6):064008. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevapplied.11.06400810.1103/physrevapplied.11.064008 ↗
29. Liu Z, Su K, Cheng Y, Ramanujan R (2015) Structure and properties evolutions for hard magnetic MnAl and MnGa based alloys prepared by melt spinning or mechanical milling. Mater Sci Eng Adv Res 1(1):12–1910.24218/msear.2015.03 ↗
30. Yanar C, Wiezorek JMK, Soffa WA, Radmilovic V (2002) Massive transformation and the formation of the ferromagnetic L1$$0$$ phase in manganese-aluminium-based alloys. Metall Mater Trans A 33:2413–2423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-002-0363-310.1007/s11661-002-0363-3 ↗
31. Jia Y, Wu Y, Zhao S, Wang J, Jiang C (2018) Relation between solidification microstructure and coercivity in MnAl permanent-magnet alloys. Intermetallics 96:41–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intermet.2018.02.01110.1016/j.intermet.2018.02.011 ↗
32. Wiezorek JMK, Kulovits AK, Yanar C, Soffa WA (2010) Grain boundary mediated displacive-diffusional formation of $$\tau$$-phase MnAl. Metall Mater Trans A 42(3):594–604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-010-0308-110.1007/s11661-010-0308-1 ↗
33. Zhao P, Feng L, Nielsch K, Woodcock TG (2021) Microstructural defects in hot deformed and as-transformed $$\tau$$-Mn–Al–C. J Alloys Compd 852:156998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15699810.1016/j.jallcom.2020.156998 ↗
34. Jia Y, Wu Y, Zhao S, Zuo S, Skokov KP, Gutfleisch O, Jiang C, Xu H (2020) L1$$0$$ rare-earth-free permanent magnets: the effects of twinning versus dislocations in Mn–Al magnets. Phys Rev Mater 4(9):094402. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevmaterials.4.09440210.1103/physrevmaterials.4.094402 ↗
35. Wei J, Song Z, Yang Y, Liu S, Du H, Han J, Zhou D, Wang C, Yang Y, Franz A et al (2014) $$\tau$$-MnAl with high coercivity and saturation magnetization. AIP Adv 4(12):127113. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.490377310.1063/1.4903773 ↗
36. Si P, Qian H, Wang X, Yang Y, Park J, Ge H, Choi C-J (2019) High-pressure synthesis of high coercivity bulk mnal-c magnets from melt-spun ribbons. J Electron Mater 48(2):794–798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-018-6798-010.1007/s11664-018-6798-0 ↗
37. Rial J, Palmero EM, Bollero A (2020) Efficient nanostructuring of isotropic gas-atomized MnAl powder by rapid milling (30 s). Engineering 6(2):173–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2019.03.01310.1016/j.eng.2019.03.013 ↗
38. Bance S, Bittner F, Woodcock TG, Schultz L, Schrefl T (2017) Role of twin and anti-phase defects in MnAl permanent magnets. Acta Mater 131:48–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2017.04.00410.1016/j.actamat.2017.04.004 ↗
39. Jakubovics JP, Jolly TW (1977) The effect of crystal defects on the domain structure of Mn–Al alloys. Phys B 86–88:1357–1359. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4363(77)90910-x10.1016/0378-4363(77)90910-x ↗
40. Gutierrez-Urrutia I, Zaefferer S, Raabe D (2013) Coupling of electron channeling with EBSD: toward the quantitative characterization of deformation structures in the SEM. JOM 65(9):1229–1236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0678-010.1007/s11837-013-0678-0 ↗
41. Zaefferer S, Elhami N-N (2014) Theory and application of electron channelling contrast imaging under controlled diffraction conditions. Acta Mater 75:20–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2014.04.01810.1016/j.actamat.2014.04.018 ↗