Modelling and analysis of effective thermal conductivity for polymer composites with sheet-like nanoparticles
Source abstract
Abstract
Effective thermal conductivity models for nanosheet-based composites are less common than those for composites containing spherical nanoparticle. A novel theoretical model for effective thermal conductivity is proposed aiming to the sheet-like nanoparticle polymer composites in this paper, and comparative analysis is made with other relevant models as well as experimental data. The effective thermal conductivity of the anisotropic nanoparticle is obtained by analysing the differential equations of a sheet-like nanoparticle with an interphase layer in both in-plane and through-plane directions in a cylindrical coordinate system. Then the present model is established based on the Nan’s model and the solutions of these differential equations. The present model which contains the effects of detailed geometry and anisotropy of nanosheet as well as interphase layer are analysed and validated with other models and experimental data. The results of present model are in good agreement with some available experimental results.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Thermal properties of materials · Composite Material Mechanics · Nanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. Han Z, Fina A (2011) Thermal conductivity of carbon nanotubes and their polymer nanocomposites: a review. Prog Polym Sci 36:914–94410.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.11.004 ↗
2. Chen H, Ginzburg VV, Yang J, Yang Y, Liu W, Huang Y, Du L, Chen B (2016) Thermal conductivity of polymer-based composites: fundamentals and applications. Prog Polym Sci 59:41–8510.1016/j.progpolymsci.2016.03.001 ↗
3. Ji H, Sellan DP, Pettes MT, Kong X, Ji J, Shi L, Ruoff RS (2014) Enhanced thermal conductivity of phase change materials with ultrathin-graphite foams for thermal energy storage. Energy Environ Sci 7:1185–119210.1039/C3EE42573H ↗
4. Burger N, Laachachi A, Ferriol M, Lutz M, Toniazzo V, Ruch D (2016) Review of thermal conductivity in composites: mechanisms, parameters and theory. Prog Polym Sci 61:1–2810.1016/j.progpolymsci.2016.05.001 ↗
5. Zhang P, Yuan P, Jiang X, Zhai S, Zeng J, Xian Y, Qin H, Yang D (2017) A Theoretical review on interfacial thermal transport at the nanoscale. Small 14:170276910.1002/smll.201702769 ↗
6. Zhang P, Zeng J, Zhai S, Xian Y, Yang D, Li Q (2017) Thermal properties of graphene filled polymer composite thermal interface materials. Macromol Mater Eng 302:1700068. https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.20170006810.1002/mame.201700068 ↗
7. Zhai S, Zhang P, Xian Y, Zeng J, Shi B (2018) Effective thermal conductivity of polymer composites: theoretical models and simulation models. Int J Heat Mass Trans 117:358–37410.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.09.067 ↗
8. Maxwell-Garnett JC (1904) Colours in metal glasses and in metallic films. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser A 203:385–42010.1098/rsta.1904.0024 ↗
9. Hamilton RL, Crosser OK (1962) An Experimental Determination of the Thermal Conductivity of Several Greases. J Chem Eng Data 7:59–6210.1021/je60012a017 ↗
10. Every AG, Tzou Y, Hasselman DPH, Raj R (1992) The effect of particle size on the thermal conductivity of ZnS/diamond composites. Acta Metall Mater 40:123–12910.1016/0956-7151(92)90205-S ↗
11. Xu JZ, Gao BZ, Kang FY (2016) A reconstruction of Maxwell model for effective thermal conductivity of composite materials. Appl Therm Eng 102:972–97910.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.03.155 ↗
12. Nan C, Birringer R, Clarke DR, Gleiter H (1997) Effective thermal conductivity of particulate composites with interfacial thermal resistance. J Appl Phys 81:6692–669910.1063/1.365209 ↗
13. Chen G, Yang R (2004) Thermal conductivity modeling of periodic two-dimensional nanocomposites. Phys Rev B 69:19531610.1103/PhysRevB.69.195316 ↗
14. Shahil KMF, Balandin AA (2012) Graphene-multilayer graphene nanocomposites as highly efficient thermal interface materials. Nano Lett 12:861–86710.1021/nl203906r ↗
15. Shen X, Wang Z, Wu Y, Liu X, He Y, Kim J (2016) Multilayer graphene enables higher efficiency in improving thermal conductivities of graphene/epoxy composites. Nano Lett 16:3585–359310.1021/acs.nanolett.6b00722 ↗
16. Chu K, Jia C, Tian W, Liang X, Chen H, Guo H (2010) Thermal conductivity of spark plasma sintering consolidated SiCp/Al composites containing pores: numerical study and experimental validation. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 41:161–16710.1016/j.compositesa.2009.10.001 ↗
17. Yu W, Xie H, Yin L, Zhao J, Xia L, Chen L (2015) Exceptionally high thermal conductivity of thermal grease: synergistic effects of graphene and alumina. Int J Therm Sci 91:76–8210.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2015.01.006 ↗
18. Rittigstein P, Priestley RD, Broadbelt LJ, Torkelson JM (2007) Model polymer nanocomposites provide an understanding of confinement effects in real nanocomposites. Nat Mater 6:278–28210.1038/nmat1870 ↗
19. Fragiadakis D, Pissis P, Bokobza L (2005) Glass transition and molecular dynamics in poly(dimethylsiloxane)/silica nanocomposites. Polymer 46:6001–600810.1016/j.polymer.2005.05.080 ↗
20. Ding W, Eitan A, Fisher FT, Chen X, Dikin DA, Andrews R, Brinson LC, Schadler LS, Ruoff RS (2003) Direct Observation of Polymer Sheathing in Carbon Nanotube − Polycarbonate Composites. Nano Lett 3:1593–159710.1021/nl0345973 ↗
21. Liu YY, Hamon A, Haghi-Ashtiani P, Reiss T, Fan B, He D, Bai J (2016) Quantitative study of interface/interphase in epoxy/graphene-based nanocomposites by combining STEM and EELS. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:34151–3415810.1021/acsami.6b12915 ↗
22. Xian Y, Zhang P, Zhai S, Yuan P, Yang D (2018) Experimental characterization methods for thermal contact resistance: a review. Appl Therm Eng 130:1530–154810.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.10.163 ↗
23. Schadler LS, Kumar SK, Benicewicz BC, Lewis SL, Harton SE (2007) Designed interfaces in polymer nanocomposites: a fundamental viewpoint. MRS Bull 32:335–34010.1557/mrs2007.232 ↗
24. Kochetov R, Korobko A, Andritsch T, Smit JJ (2011) Modelling of the thermal conductivity in polymer nanocomposites and the impact of the interface between filler and matrix. J Phys D Appl Phys 44:39540110.1088/0022-3727/44/39/395401 ↗
25. Xie H, Fujii M, Zhang X (2005) Effect of interfacial nanolayer on the effective thermal conductivity of nanoparticle–fluid mixture. Int J Heat Mass Trans 48:2926–293210.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2004.10.040 ↗
26. Todd MG, Shi FG (2005) Complex permittivity of composite systems: a comprehensive interphase approach. IEEE Trans Dielectr Electr Insul 12:601–61110.1109/TDEI.2005.1453466 ↗
27. Parker K, Schneider RT, Siegel RW, Ozisik R, Cabanelas JC, Serrano B, Antonelli C, Baselga J (2010) Molecular probe technique for determining local thermal transitions: the glass transition at Silica/PMMA nanocomposite interfaces. Polymer 51:4891–489810.1016/j.polymer.2010.08.051 ↗
28. Coleman JN, Cadek M, Ryan KP, Fonseca A, Nagy JB, Blau WJ, Ferreira MS (2006) Reinforcement of polymers with carbon nanotubes. The role of an ordered polymer interfacial region. Experiment and modeling. Polymer 47:8556–856110.1016/j.polymer.2006.10.014 ↗
29. Tsekmes IA, Kochetov R, Morshuis PHF, Smit JJ (2014) Modeling the thermal conductivity of polymeric composites based on experimental observations. IEEE Trans Dielectr Electr Insul 21:412–42310.1109/TDEI.2013.004142 ↗
30. Qu M, Deng F, Kalkhoran SM, Gouldstone A, Robisson A, Van Vliet KJ (2011) Nanoscale visualization and multiscale mechanical implications of bound rubber interphases in rubber-carbon black nanocomposites. Soft Matter 7:1066–107710.1039/C0SM00645A ↗
31. Leong KC, Yang C, Murshed SMS (2006) A model for the thermal conductivity of nanofluids: the effect of interfacial layer. J Nanoparticle Res 8:245–25410.1007/s11051-005-9018-9 ↗
32. Yang L, Xu X (2017) A renovated Hamilton-Crosser model for the effective thermal conductivity of CNTs nanofluids. Int Commun Heat Mass 81:42–5010.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2016.12.010 ↗
33. Jiang H, Xu Q, Huang C, Shi L (2015) The role of interfacial nanolayer in the enhanced thermal conductivity of carbon nanotube-based nanofluids. Appl Phys A 118:197–20510.1007/s00339-014-8902-5 ↗
34. Yang L, Xu X, Jiang W, Du K (2017) A new thermal conductivity model for nanorod-based nanofluids. Appl Therm Eng 114:287–29910.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.11.183 ↗
35. Luo T, Lloyd JR (2012) Enhancement of thermal energy transport across graphene/graphite and polymer interfaces: a molecular dynamics study. Adv Funct Mater 22:2495–250210.1002/adfm.201103048 ↗
36. Lindsay L, Broido DA, Mingo N (2010) Flexural phonons and thermal transport in graphene. Phys Rev B 82:11542710.1103/PhysRevB.82.115427 ↗
37. Duan HL, Karihaloo BL (2007) Effective thermal conductivities of heterogeneous media containing multiple imperfectly bonded inclusions. Phys Rev B 75:64206–6421510.1103/PhysRevB.75.064206 ↗
38. Nan C, Liu G, Lin Y, Li M (2004) Interface effect on thermal conductivity of carbon nanotube composites. Appl Phys Lett 85:3549–355110.1063/1.1808874 ↗
39. Hemmat Esfe M, Saedodin S, Mahian O, Wongwises S (2014) Thermal conductivity of Al2O3/water nanofluids. J Therm Anal Calorim 117:675–68110.1007/s10973-014-3771-x ↗
40. Ganguli S, Roy AK, Anderson DP (2008) Improved thermal conductivity for chemically functionalized exfoliated graphite/epoxy composites. Carbon 46:806–81710.1016/j.carbon.2008.02.008 ↗
41. Zabihi Z, Araghi H (2016) Effect of functional groups on thermal conductivity of graphene/paraffin nanocomposite. Phys Lett A 380:3828–383110.1016/j.physleta.2016.09.028 ↗
42. Yu W, Xie H, Chen L, Zhu Z, Zhao J, Zhang Z (2014) Graphene based silicone thermal greases. Phys Lett A 378:207–21110.1016/j.physleta.2013.10.017 ↗
43. Lin Z, Liu Y, Raghavan S, Moon K, Sitaraman SK, Wong C (2013) Magnetic alignment of hexagonal boron nitride platelets in polymer matrix: toward high performance anisotropic polymer composites for electronic encapsulation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5:7633–764010.1021/am401939z ↗
44. Yuan C, Duan B, Li L, Xie B, Huang M, Luo X (2015) Thermal conductivity of polymer-based composites with magnetic aligned hexagonal boron nitride platelets. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:13000–1300610.1021/acsami.5b03007 ↗
45. Jo I, Pettes MT, Kim J, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Yao Z, Shi L (2013) Thermal conductivity and phonon transport in suspended few-layer hexagonal boron nitride. Nano Lett 13:550–55410.1021/nl304060g ↗
46. Chen L, Sun Y, Xu H, He S, Wei G, Du X, Lin J (2016) Analytic modeling for the anisotropic thermal conductivity of polymer composites containing aligned hexagonal boron nitride. Compos Sci Technol 122:42–4910.1016/j.compscitech.2015.11.013 ↗
47. Wu H, Kessler MR (2015) Multifunctional cyanate ester nanocomposites reinforced by hexagonal boron nitride after noncovalent biomimetic functionalization. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:5915–592610.1021/acsami.5b00147 ↗
48. Ning N, Mi T, Chu G, Zhang L, Liu L, Tian M, Yu H, Lu Y (2018) A quantitative approach to study the interface of carbon nanotubes/elastomer nanocomposites. Eur Polym J 102:10–1810.1016/j.eurpolymj.2018.03.007 ↗