Effects of the core of liquid-like SiO2 nanoparticle organic hybrid materials on CO2 capture
Source abstract
Abstract
A series of specific liquid-like silicon dioxide (SiO2) nanoparticle organic hybrid materials (NOHMs) were successfully prepared by employing different contents of SiO2 as the core, 3-glycidoxypropyl trime thoxysilane (KH-560) or 3-(trihydroxysilyl)-1-propane sulfonic acid (SIT) as the corona and polyetheramine M-1000 (M-1000) as the canopy. These materials showed a solvent-free and liquid-like state at room temperature. The effect of the SiO2 content in the NOHMs with different bonding types on the CO2 capture capacity was investigated at 298 K and CO2 pressures ranging from 1.0 to 2.5 MPa. It was demonstrated that the capacity of the sorbents improved with the decreasing of SiO2 content. This result was due to the larger number of reactive groups and lower viscosity of the NOHMs. The reactive groups, such as secondary amine and ether groups, react with CO2 molecules, while the lower viscosity creates larger molecular gap and weaker intermolecular forces, which facilitates the penetration of CO2 molecules into the potential space between organic chains. In addition, the NOHMs synthesized via covalent bonds had a much better CO2 capture capacity than the NOHMs with ionic bonds and the same content of SiO2, owing to the protonation of the amine groups in the ionic bond-typed NOHMs, which renders them inactive for CO2 uptake.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies · Membrane Separation and Gas Transport · Covalent Organic Framework Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Miller RL, Schmidt GA, Shindell DT (2007) Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Cambridge University Press, UK
2. Creamer AE, Gao B (2015) Carbon dioxide capture: an effective way to combat global warming. Springer International Publishing, Berlin10.1007/978-3-319-17010-7 ↗
3. Revesz RL, Howard PH et al (2014) Global warming: improve economic models of climate change. Nature 508:173–17510.1038/508173a ↗
4. Metz B (2005) IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage. Economics and politics of climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
5. Sun N, Tang Z, Wei W et al (2015) Solid adsorbents for low-temperature CO2 capture with low-energy penalties leading to more effective integrated solutions for power generation and industrial processes. Front Energy Res 3:1–16
6. Wang J, Wang M, Li W et al (2014) Application of polyethylenimine-impregnated solid adsorbents for direct capture of low-concentration CO2. AIChE J 61(3):972–98010.1002/aic.14679 ↗
7. Makhseed S, Samuel J (2013) Microporous organic polymers incorporating dicarboximide units for H2 storage and remarkable CO2 capture. J Mater Chem A 1(41):13004–1301010.1039/c3ta12233f ↗
8. Liu SH, Wu CH, Lee HK et al (2010) Highly stable amine-modified mesoporous silica materials for efficient CO2 capture. Top Catal 53(3):210–217
9. SánchezSánchez A, Suárezgarcía F, Martínezalonso A et al (2017) Influence of porous texture and surface chemistry on the CO2 adsorption capacity of porous carbons: acidic and basic site interactions. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6(23):21237–2124710.1021/am506176e ↗
10. Chen J, Yang J, Hu X et al (2016) Enhanced CO2 capture capacity of nitrogen-doped biomass-derived porous carbons. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 4(3):1439–144510.1021/acssuschemeng.5b01425 ↗
11. Khan AA, Halder GN, Saha AK (2015) Carbon dioxide capture characteristics from flue gas using aqueous 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol (AMP) and monoethanolamine (MEA) solutions in packed bed absorption and regeneration columns. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 32(32):15–2310.1016/j.ijggc.2014.10.009 ↗
12. Krótki A, Więcław-Solny L, Tatarczuk A et al (2016) Laboratory studies of post-combustion CO2 capture by absorption with MEA and AMP solvents. Arab J Sci Eng 41(2):371–37910.1007/s13369-015-2008-z ↗
13. Kang MK, Kim ID, Kim BJ et al (2015) Characteristics of absorption/regeneration of AMP/MEA using hybrid packing for the improvement of CO2 absorption performance. Ind Eng Chem Res 54(22):5853–586110.1021/acs.iecr.5b01378 ↗
14. Eckeveld ACV, Ham LVVD, Geers LFG et al (2014) Online monitoring of the solvent and absorbed acid gas concentration in a CO2 capture process using monoethanolamine. Ind Eng Chem Res 53(13):5515–552310.1021/ie402310n ↗
15. Smith DGA, Patkowski K (2015) Benchmarking the CO2 adsorption energy on carbon nanotubes. J Phys Chem C 119(9):4934–494810.1021/jp512926n ↗
16. Saleh M, Kim KS (2015) Highly selective CO2 adsorption performance of carbazole based microporous polymers. RSC Adv 5(52):41745–4175010.1039/C5RA06767G ↗
17. Wu Q, Chen S, Luo S et al (2015) Aminating modification of viscose fibers and their CO2 adsorption properties. J Appl Polym Sci 133(1):4284010.1002/app.42840 ↗
18. Yu NK, Dong YY, Arul NS et al (2015) Carrier transport mechanisms of multilevel nonvolatile memory devices with a floating gate consisting of hybrid organic/inorganic nanocomposites. Org Electron 17(17):270–274
19. Casula G, Cosseddu P (2015) Air-stable, non-volatile resistive memory based on hybrid organic/inorganic nanocomposites. Org Electron 18:17–2310.1016/j.orgel.2015.01.001 ↗
20. Padmaraj O, Rao BN, Jena P et al (2014) Electrochemical studies of electrospun organic/inorganic hybrid nanocomposite fibrous polymer electrolyte for lithium battery. Polymer 55(5):1136–114210.1016/j.polymer.2014.01.015 ↗
21. Fanelli F, Mastrangelo AM, Fracassi F (2014) Correction to aerosol-assisted atmospheric cold plasma deposition and characterization of superhydrophobic organic–inorganic nanocomposite thin films. Langmuir ACS J Surf Colloids 30(3):259–26210.1021/la404755n ↗
22. Qi G, Fu L, Giannelis EP (2014) Sponges with Covalently tethered amines for high-efficiency carbon capture. Nat Commun 5:579610.1038/ncomms6796 ↗
23. Lin KY, Park AH (2011) Effects of bonding types and functional groups on CO2 capture using novel multiphase systems of liquid-like nanoparticle organic hybrid materials. Environ Sci Technol 45(15):6633–663910.1021/es200146g ↗
24. Petit C, Park Y, Lin KYA et al (2012) Spectroscopic investigation of the canopy configurations in nanoparticle organic hybrid materials of various grafting densities during CO2 capture. J Phys Chem C 116(1):516–52510.1021/jp210391c ↗
25. Park Y, Decatur J (2011) Investigation of CO2 capture mechanisms of liquid-like nanoparticle organic hybrid materials via structural characterization. Phys Chem Chem Phys 13(40):18115–1812210.1039/c1cp22631b ↗
26. Qu P, Zheng YP, Yang RL et al (2015) Effect of canopy structures on CO2 capture capacity and properties of NONMs. Colloid Polym Sci 293(6):1–12
27. Choudhury S, Agrawal A, Kim SA, Archer LA (2015) Self-suspended suspensions of covalently grafted hairy nanoparticles. Langmuir 31:3222–323110.1021/la5048326 ↗
28. Li PP, Yang RL, Zheng YP et al (2015) Effect of polyether amine canopy structure on carbon dioxide uptake of solvent-free nanofluids based on multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Carbon 95:408–41810.1016/j.carbon.2015.08.060 ↗
29. Yang RL, Zheng YP, Li PP et al (2017) Investigation of power strip like composite nanoparticles derivative with liquid-like behaviour on capturing carbon dioxide. New J Chem 41:603–61010.1039/C6NJ02797K ↗
30. Yang RL, Zheng YP, Li PP et al (2016) Effects of acidification time of MWCNTs on carbon dioxide capture of liquid-like MWCNTs organic hybrid materials. RSC Adv 6:85970–8597710.1039/C6RA16909K ↗
31. Lin KYA, Petit C, Park AH (2013) Effect of SO2 on CO2 capture using liquid-like nanoparticle organic hybrid materials. Energy Fuels 27(8):4167–417410.1021/ef400374q ↗
32. Srivastava S, Archer LA (2011) Nanoparticle organic hybrid suspensions: structure and rheology. https://meetings.aps.org/link/BAPS.2011.MAR.X44.1 . Accessed 12 Feb 2017
33. Agrawal A, Choudhury S, Archer LA (2015) A highly conductive, non-flammable polymer–nanoparticle hybrid electrolyte. RSC Adv 5:20800–2080910.1039/C5RA01031D ↗