Grain boundary reorientation in copper
Source abstract
Abstract
The present route to grain boundary engineering (GBE) is usually based on multiple annealing twinning which can only be applied to a certain subset of materials, namely those that twin prolifically. A more general approach has been highlighted recently, following experimental evidence that certain boundary planes in iron bicrystals are ‘special’, and that this classification is not based on misorientation. It was suggested that, under suitable conditions, individual interfaces could reorient the most energetically advantageous orientations. This approach concurs with a similar concept of ‘grain boundary plane engineering’, proposed previously. In the present article we explore this concept and report the effect of long duration, low temperature annealing on the distribution of boundary misorientation and planes in copper. The new findings give support to the possibility of grain boundary structure optimisation via controlled annealing. To have established that grain boundary plane reorientation is feasible opens up new avenues and challenges in the field of grain boundary research. This could have significant impact both scientifically in terms of understanding grain boundary structure and technologically in the field of GBE.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Magnetic Properties and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Randle V (2004) Acta Mater 52:406710.1016/j.actamat.2004.05.031 ↗
2. Kumar M, Schuh CA (eds) (2006) Viewpoint set no. 40, Scripta Mater. Grain boundary engineering, vol 54, p 96110.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.11.059 ↗
3. Lin P, Palumbo G, Erb U, Aust KT (1995) Scripta Met Mater 33:138710.1016/0956-716X(95)00420-Z ↗
4. Janssens KGF, Olmsted D, Holm EA, Foiles SM, Plimpton SJ, Derlet PM (2006) Nat Mater 5:12410.1038/nmat1559 ↗
5. Wolf D (1990) Acta Metall Mater 38:79110.1016/0956-7151(90)90031-B ↗
6. Merkle KL, Wolf D (1992) Philos Mag 65A:51310.1080/01418619208201536 ↗
7. Randle V, Davies P, Hulm B (1999) Philos Mag 79A:30510.1080/01418619908210299 ↗
8. Lejcek P, Hofmann S, Paidar V (2003) Acta Mater 51:395110.1016/S1359-6454(03)00219-2 ↗
9. Saylor DM, Adams BL, El-Dasher BS, Rohrer GS (2003) Metall Mater Trans 34A:1
10. Saylor DM, Morawiec A, Rohrer GS (2003) Acta Mater 51:366310.1016/S1359-6454(03)00181-2 ↗
11. Saylor DM, El-Dasher BS, Rollett AD, Rohrer GS (2004) Acta Mater 52:364910.1016/j.actamat.2004.04.018 ↗
12. Randle V, Rohrer GS, Kim C, Hu Y (2006) Acta Mater 54:448010.1016/j.actamat.2005.11.046 ↗
13. Brandon DG (1966) Acta Metall 14:147910.1016/0001-6160(66)90168-4 ↗
14. Fullman RL (1951) J Appl Phys 22:45610.1063/1.1699983 ↗
15. Sargent CM (1968) Trans Metall Soc AIME 242
16. Randle V, Davies H (2002) Ultramicroscopy 90:15310.1016/S0304-3991(01)00137-1 ↗
17. Wolf U, Ernst F, Muschik T, Finnis MW, Fischmeister HF (1992) Philos Mag A 66:99110.1080/01418619208248003 ↗
18. Gindraux G, Form W (1973) J Inst Metal 101:85
19. Reed BW, Kumar M (2006) Scripta Mater 54:102910.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.11.045 ↗
20. Garg A, Clark WAT, Hirth JP (1989) Philos Mag 59:47910.1080/01418618908229780 ↗
21. Randle V (1999) Acta Mater 47:418710.1016/S1359-6454(99)00277-3 ↗