Relevance of instrumented nano-indentation for the assessment of the mechanical properties of eutectic crystals and α-Al grain in cast aluminum alloys
Source abstract
Abstract
To better understand the material properties of cast aluminum alloys, the mechanical properties of microscopic structures (the eutectic structure and the α-Al phase) have been systematically examined using a special nano-indentation hardness test machine. In this approach, a triangular indentation is applied directly to the eutectic structure or α-Al phase, and the mechanical properties evaluated through hardness and load-strain relationships. The hardness of the eutectic phase varied, depending on the structural characteristics of the different intermetallic compounds. High values of hardness were obtained structures of the DO3 type, e.g., Al5FeSi, but low hardness for CuAl2 and Mg2Si. The hardness of CuAl2 and Mg2Si had almost the same values as that of the α-Al matrix. In addition, from the nano-indentation hardness test, the effects of α-Al grain characteristics on the mechanical properties were clarified. The hardness of the α-Al grain was linearly related to the grain size and the distance from the grain boundary, where the higher the hardness, the smaller the grain size and the closer to the grain boundary. The hardness level was attributed to the different severity of slip resistance of the atoms during the indentation loading.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. Mae H, Teng X, Bai Y, Wiezbicki T (2008) Int J Solid Struct 45:143010.1016/j.ijsolstr.2007.10.016 ↗
2. Polmear IJ (2007) Light alloys from traditional alloys to nanocrystals, 4th edn. Elsevier, London, p 205
3. Okayasu M, Nishi N, Kanazawa K (1998) J Jpn Foundry Eng Soc 70:266 (Japanese)
4. Kim JJ, Kim DH, Shin KS, Kim NJ (1999) Scr Mater 41:33310.1016/S1359-6462(99)00172-4 ↗
5. Yoo MS, Kwang SS, Kim NJ (2002) Metall Mater Trans A 35:162910.1007/s11661-004-0268-4 ↗
6. Okayasu M, Takasu S, Yoshie S (2010) J Mater Process Tech 210:152910.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.04.012 ↗
7. Chuang TH, Yeh MS, Tsao LC, Tsai TC, Wu CS (2000) Metall Mater Trans A 31:223910.1007/s11661-000-0141-z ↗
8. Li Z, Samuel AM, Samuel FH, Ravindran C, Valtierra S (2003) J Mater Sci 38:1203. doi: 10.1023/A:102285770399510.1023/A:1022857703995 ↗
9. Hertzberg RW (1996) Deformation and fracture mechanics of engineering materials, 4th edn. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York
10. Osório WR, Goulart PR, Santos GA, Neto CM, Garcia A (2006) Metall Mater Trans A 37:252510.1007/BF02586225 ↗
11. Kanazawa K, Okayasu M (1998) Trans Jpn Soc Mech Eng 64:1956 Japanese10.1299/kikaia.64.1956 ↗
12. Iwahori H, Tozawa K, Asano T, Yamamoto Y, Nakamura M, Hashimoto M, Uenishi S (1984) J Jpn Inst Light Met 34:525 Japanese10.2464/jilm.34.525 ↗
13. Hekmat-Ardakan A, Ajersch F, Chen X-G (2011) J Mater Sci 46:2370. doi: 10.1007/s10853-010-5084-110.1007/s10853-010-5084-1 ↗
14. Shimadzu, Technical Manual for DUH-211 (Shimadzu Co.), p 5-2 (Japanese)
15. Okayasu M, Yoshifuji S, Mizuno M, Hitomi M, Yamazaki H (2009) Int J Cast Metal Res 22:37410.1179/174313309X380413 ↗
16. Okayasu M, Hitomi M, Yamazaki H (2009) J Eur Ceram Soc 29:236910.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2009.01.013 ↗