Some aspects of the anisotropy of grain boundary segregation and wetting
Source abstract
Abstract
A recently developed model of grain boundary (GB) segregation, in terms of the five macroscopic parameters of GB orientation, has been exercised to explore the anisotropy of GB segregation. The five macroscopic GB orientation parameters are defined by means of the orientations of the two crystallographic planes that terminate the crystals on either side of the GB, and a twist angle. Some important conclusions include the following: (a) the composition of a boundary depends on all five parameters of GB orientation, (b) the segregation profile across a GB depends on the two planes which terminate the adjacent crystals, (c) the composition profile across GB’s terminated by identical crystallographic planes is symmetric, but is asymmetric when GB’s are terminated by different planes, and (d) the strength of the segregation on one side of a GB influences the extent of segregation on the other. Some experimental results on Nb-doped TiO2 are presented in order to verify above predicted trends. In addition, it is shown that the model predicts the possibility of anisotropic GB wetting transitions as two-phase coexistence is approached.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Metallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Pang Y, Wynblatt P (2005) J Am Ceram Soc 88:228610.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.00400.x ↗
2. Pang Y, Wynblatt P (2006) J Am Ceram Soc 89:66610.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.00759.x ↗
3. Wolf D (1989) Acta Metall 37:198310.1016/0001-6160(89)90082-5 ↗
4. Wolf D (1989) Acta Metall 37:282310.1016/0001-6160(89)90317-9 ↗
5. Wolf D (1990) Acta Metall Mater 38:79110.1016/0956-7151(90)90031-B ↗
6. Seidman DN (2002) Annu Rev Mater Res 32:23510.1146/annurev.matsci.32.011602.095455 ↗
7. Wynblatt P, Shi Z (2005) J Mater Sci 40:276510.1007/s10853-005-2406-9 ↗
8. Bishop CM, Cannon RM, Carter WC (2005) Acta Mater 53:475510.1016/j.actamat.2005.07.008 ↗
9. Tang M, Carter WC, Cannon RM (2006) Phys Rev B 73(2):2410210.1103/PhysRevB.73.024102 ↗
10. Wynblatt P, Takashima M (2001) In: Eustathopoulos N, Nogi K, Sobczak N (eds), Proceedings of HTC-2000, Trans JWRI 30:11
11. Wynblatt P, Takashima M (2001) Interface Sci 9:26510.1023/A:1015162929100 ↗
12. López GA, Mittemeijer EJ, Straumal BB (2004) Acta Mater 52:453710.1016/j.actamat.2004.06.011 ↗
13. Avishai A, Sheu C, Kaplan WD (2005) Acta Mater 53:155910.1016/j.actamat.2004.12.009 ↗
14. Avishai A, Kaplan WD (2005) Acta Mater 53:157110.1016/j.actamat.2004.12.008 ↗
15. Mclean D (1957) Grain boundaries in metals. Oxford Press, London
16. Wynblatt P, Ku RC (1979) In: Johnson WC, Blakely JM (eds), Interfacial segregation. ASM, Metals Park, Ohio, p 115
17. Wynblatt P, Saul A, Chatain D (1998) Acta Mater 46:233710.1016/S1359-6454(98)80015-3 ↗
18. Lee YW, Aaronson HI (1980) Surface Sci 95:22710.1016/0039-6028(80)90138-7 ↗
19. Lee YW, Aaronson HI (1980) Acta Metall 28:53910.1016/0001-6160(80)90143-1 ↗
20. Udler D, Seidman DN (1992) Phys Stat Sol B 172:26710.1002/pssb.2221720124 ↗
21. Udler D, Seidman DN (1994) Acta Metall Mater 42:195910.1016/0956-7151(94)90021-3 ↗
22. Foiles SM, Baskes MI, MS Daw (1986) Phys Rev B33:798310.1103/PhysRevB.33.7983 ↗
23. Cahn JW (1977) J Chem Phys 66:366710.1063/1.434402 ↗
24. Schick M (1990) In: Charvolin J, Joanny JF, Zinn-Justin J (eds), Liquids at interfaces. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p 415
25. Widom B (1978) J Chem Phys 68:387810.1063/1.436195 ↗
26. Cahn JW (2000) Physica A 279:19510.1016/S0378-4371(99)00513-0 ↗