Barkhausen noise characterisation during elastic bending and tensile-compression loading of case-hardened and tempered samples
Source abstract
Abstract
This study examined the Barkhausen noise (BN) response of carburising case-hardened steel with varying tempering stages. The test material was loaded in bending and in alternating loading. The aim of the study was to obtain relevant multiparameter BN data from different loading conditions and to investigate the effect of applied stress on the BN response. The test bar series was made from case-hardened steel. Different tempering parameters were used to vary the surface hardness and the surface residual stresses of the studied series of test bars. In the bending tests, the samples were subjected to incrementally applied loading in the purely elastic deformation region. In addition, uniaxial stepwise loading with tensile and compressive stress was applied to selected samples simultaneously with the BN measurements. The BN measurements were performed under different loading conditions along with X-ray diffraction strain measurements in bending. The results revealed linear behaviour between the reciprocal root mean square value and the stress values obtained with strain gages and X-ray diffraction for the tempered samples.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic Properties and Applications · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Internet: http://www.msm.cam.ac.uk/phasetrans/2004/Tempered.Martensite/ tempered.martensite.html, 14.2.2012
2. Porter DA, Easterling KE (1992) Phase transformations in metals and alloys, 2nd edn. Nelson Thornes, Cheltenham10.1007/978-1-4899-3051-4 ↗
3. Honeycombe R, Bhadeshia HKDH (1995) Steels, microstructures and properties, 2nd edn edn. Edward Arnold, London
4. Totten GE (ed) (1997) Steel heat treatment: metallurgy and technologies. Deklor, New York
5. Moorthy V, Vaidyanathan S, Jayakumar T, Raj B (1997) J Magn Magn Mater 171:17910.1016/S0304-8853(97)00049-8 ↗
6. Shaw BA, Evans JT, Blaow M (2005) Proceedings of 5th international conference on Barkhausen noise and micromagnetic testing, Petten, The Netherlands, 2–3 June, 2005, p 133
7. Ahn ST, Kim DS, Nam WJ (2005) J Mater Process Technol 160:5410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.03.019 ↗
8. Moorthy V, Vaidyanathan S, Jayakumar T, Raj B (1998) Philos Mag A 77(6):149910.1080/01418619808214266 ↗
9. Jiles DC (1991) Introduction to magnetism and magnetic materials. Chapman and Hall, New York10.1007/978-1-4615-3868-4 ↗
10. Lindgren M, Lepistö T (2001) NDT E Int 34(5):33710.1016/S0963-8695(00)00073-6 ↗
11. Blaow M, Evans JT, Shaw BA (2007) J Mater Sci 42(12):4364. doi: 10.1007/s10853-006-0631-510.1007/s10853-006-0631-5 ↗
12. Hyde TR, Evans JT, Shaw BA (2000) Mater Eval 58(8):985
13. Anglada-Rivera J, Padovese LR, Capó-Sánchez J (2001) J Magn Magn Mater 231:29910.1016/S0304-8853(01)00066-X ↗
14. Stewart DM, Stevens KJ, Kaiser AB (2004) Curr Appl Phys 4:30810.1016/j.cap.2003.11.035 ↗
15. Cullity BD (1972) Introduction to magnetic materials. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading
16. Krause TW, Pattantyus A, Atherton DL (1995) IEEE Trans Magn 31(6):337610.1109/20.490387 ↗
17. Stefanita CG, Atherton DL, Clapham L (2000) Acta Mater 48(13):354510.1016/S1359-6454(00)00134-8 ↗
18. Kleber X, Vincent A (2004) NDT E Int 37:43910.1016/j.ndteint.2003.11.008 ↗
19. Stefanita CG, Atherton DL, Clapham L (2000) J Mater Sci 35:2675. doi: 10.1023/A:100474160671310.1023/A:1004741606713 ↗
20. Blaow M, Evans JT, Shaw BA (2005) Acta Mater 53:27910.1016/j.actamat.2004.09.021 ↗
21. Blaow M, Evans JT, Shaw BA (2004) Mat Sci Eng A 386:7410.1016/j.msea.2004.08.007 ↗
22. Moorthy V, Shaw BA, Hopkins P (2006) J Magn Magn Mater 299(2):36310.1016/j.jmmm.2005.04.028 ↗
23. Santa-aho S, Vippola M, Lepistö T, Lindgren M (2009) Insight 51(4):21210.1784/insi.2009.51.4.212 ↗
24. Mierczak L, Jiles DC, Fantoni G (2011) IEEE Trans Magn 47(2):45910.1109/TMAG.2010.2091418 ↗
25. Santa-aho S, Vippola M, Sorsa A, Latokartano J, Lindgren M, Leiviskä K, Lepistö T (2012) J Mater Process Technol 212(2):40810.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.10.003 ↗
26. Sorsa A, Leiviskä K, Santa-aho S, Lepistö T (2012) NDT E Int 46:10010.1016/j.ndteint.2011.11.008 ↗
27. Sorsa A, Leiviskä K, Santa-aho S, Vippola M, Lepistö T (2010) Insight 52(6):29310.1784/insi.2010.52.6.293 ↗
28. European Committee for Standardization, SFS-EN 15305:2008 (2008) Non-destructive testing—Test method for residual stress analysis by X-ray diffraction, Brussels
29. Hauk V (1997) Structural and residual stress analysis by nondestructive methods. Elsevier, Amsterdam
30. Hoffmann K (1989) An introduction to measurements using strain gages. Hottinger Baldwin Messtechnik GmbH, Darmstadt
31. Cullity BD (1978) Elements of X-ray diffraction, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company Inc, Reading
32. Garikepati P, Chang TT, Jiles DC (1988) IEEE Trans Magn 24(6):292210.1109/20.92289 ↗
33. Allison HD, Hendricks RW (1997) Fifth international conference on residual stresses, Linköping, Sweden, 16–17 June 1997, p 640