journal article·2000-10

Nonlinear electrical properties of ZnO varistors fast-fired by using millimeter-wave sintering process

Wan-Chui Lee, Kuo-Shung Liu, I-Nan Lin

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 35· Issue 19
Publisher page

Abstract

Fast firing of Bi2O3-based ZnO varistor materials, which includes zero minutes soaking at 1100°C with 120°C/min heating and 145°C/min cooling rate, was made possible using millimeter-wave sintering (mS) technique. The overall sintering time of the process is less than 18 minutes, and the varistor characteristics obtained are α = 38, JL = 5.55 × 10−6 A/cm2 and Vbk = 600 V/mm, whereas the intrinsic parameters of the materials are φb = 2.84 eV, Nd = 1.85 × 1024 m−3 and Ns = 7.02 × 1011 cm−2. By contrast, conventional sintering (cS) process needs higher sintering temperature (1200°C), longer soaking time (60 min) and slower ramping rate (30°C/min) to obtain ZnO materials with the same marvelous nonlinear properties as those prepared by mS-process. Moreover, millimeter-wave sintering (24 GHz, mS) process enhances the densification kinetics and grain growth behavior more efficiently than the microwave sintering (2.45 GHz, μS) process, resulting in better varistor characteristics for ZnO materials. However, sintering by millimeter-wave for too long period induces overfiring of the samples, which results in a density reversion phenomenon. Such a phenomenon leads to the decrease in surface state (Ns) and the potential barrier height (φb), which are presumed to be the mechanism leading to the degradation of ZnO materials' nonlinear properties.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: ZnO doping and properties · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Microwave Dielectric Ceramics Synthesis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (18)

Show source-provided references
1. M. Inad, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 17 (1978) 1.10.1143/JJAP.17.1 ↗
2. L. M. Levinson and H. R. Philipp, Amer. Ceram Soc. Bull. 65 (1986) 639.
3. T. K. Gupta, J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 93 (1990) 1817.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1990.tb05232.x ↗
4. K. Eda, A. Iga and M. Matsuoka, J. Appl. Phys. 51 (1980) 2678.10.1063/1.327927 ↗
5. J. Erickson and B. Reich, IEEE Trans. Aerospace Electron. Syst. 12 (1976) 104.10.1109/TAES.1976.308273 ↗
6. H. R. Philipp and L. M. Levinson, J. Appl. Phys. 52 (1981) 1083.10.1063/1.328807 ↗
7. M. Matsuoka, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 10 (1972) 736.10.1143/JJAP.10.736 ↗
8. K. Mukae, K. Tsuda and I. Magasawa, ibid. 16 (1977) 1361.10.1143/JJAP.16.1361 ↗
9. T. R. N. Kutty and N. Raghu, Mater. Sci. Eng. B13 (1992) 181.10.1016/0921-5107(92)90162-3 ↗
10. J. K. Tasi and T. B. Wu, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 34 (1995) 6452.10.1143/JJAP.34.6452 ↗
11. W. H. Sutton, Amer. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 68 (1989) 376.
12. M. A. JANNEY, C. L. Calhoum and H. D. Kimery, J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 75 (1992) 341.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1992.tb08184.x ↗
13. H. Y. Chang, K. S. Liu and I. N. Lin, J. Appl. Phys. 77 (1995) 1.10.1063/1.359369 ↗
14. C. S. Chen, C. T. Kuo and I. N. Lin, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 35 (1996) 4696.10.1143/JJAP.35.4696 ↗
15. C. T. Kuo and I. N. Lin Idem., J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 81(11) (1998) 2949.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1998.tb02718.x ↗
16. A. Birnboim, D. Gershon, J. Calame, A. Birman, Y. Carmel, J. Rodgers, B. Levush, Y. V. Bykov, A. G. Eremeev, V. V. Holoptset, V. E. Semenov, D. Dadon, P. L. Martin and M. Rosen, ibid. 81(6) (1998) 1493.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1998.tb02508.x ↗
17. M. I. Mendelson, ibid. 52 (1969) 443.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1969.tb11975.x ↗
18. K. Mukae, K. Tsuda and I. Nagasawa, J. Appl. Phys. 50 (1979) 4475.10.1063/1.326411 ↗