Manufacturing of a metallic 3D framework coated with a bioglass matrix for implant applications
Source abstract
Abstract
In a new approach combining additive manufacturing with bioceramics, a metallic 3D porous structure coated with bioactive glass was produced for possible use in orthopedic implants. This approach aims to combine high mechanical properties of the metallic structure with enhanced biological activity. 316L stainless steel (316L-SS) lattice structures were fabricated using selective laser melting. Despite its good mechanical properties, 316L-SS lacks the biofunctionality required to achieve long-term implantation. To be successfully used as biomaterial, these porous 3D lattice structures were thus coated by 58S bioglass through a simple impregnation method. The use of a silica layer was evaluated as possible pretreatment to improve bioglass adhesion. The coated parts are then assessed by scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy-dispersive spectrometry to qualify the coating. Porous sample parts pretreated with a silica layer presented a denser coating structure when compared with untreated porous metallic structures. The bioactivity in SBF medium shows the formation of a uniform apatite layer after 7 days of immersion, producing the bioregeneration capability. This latter, combined with the lightweight framework structure provided by 316-SS, will increase the lifetime of this new generation of orthopedic implants.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Dental materials and restorations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (60)
Show source-provided references
1. Smith MC, Ben-Shlomo Y, Dieppe P, et al (2017) Rates of hip and knee joint replacement amongst different ethnic groups in England: an analysis of National Joint Registry data. Osteoarthr Cartil 25:448–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2016.12.03010.1016/j.joca.2016.12.030 ↗
2. Culliford D, Maskell J, Judge A et al (2015) Future projections of total hip and knee arthroplasty in the UK: results from the UK clinical practice research datalink. Osteoarthr Cartil 23:594–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2014.12.02210.1016/j.joca.2014.12.022 ↗
3. Lübbeke A, Silman AJ, Barea C et al (2018) Mapping existing hip and knee replacement registries in Europe. Health Policy (N Y) 122:548–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.03.01010.1016/j.healthpol.2018.03.010 ↗
4. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E et al (2007) Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Jt Surg Ser A 89:780–785. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.F.0022210.2106/JBJS.F.00222 ↗
5. Ginebra M-P, Espanol M, Maazouz Y et al (2018) Bioceramics and bone healing. EFORT Open Rev 3:173–183. https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.3.17005610.1302/2058-5241.3.170056 ↗
6. Strumza E, Yeheskel O, Hayun S (2019) The effect of texture on the anisotropy of thermophysical properties of additively manufactured AlSi10Mg. Addit Manuf 29:100762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.06.01310.1016/j.addma.2019.06.013 ↗
7. Gumbleton R, Cuenca JA, Klemencic GM et al (2019) Evaluating the coefficient of thermal expansion of additive manufactured AlSi10Mg using microwave techniques. Addit Manuf 30:100841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.10084110.1016/j.addma.2019.100841 ↗
8. Gao C, Peng S, Feng P, Shuai C (2017) Bone biomaterials and interactions with stem cells. Bone Res 5:1–33. https://doi.org/10.1038/boneres.2017.5910.1038/boneres.2017.59 ↗
9. Yan Q, Dong H, Su J et al (2018) A review of 3D printing technology for medical applications. Engineering 4:729–742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2018.07.02110.1016/j.eng.2018.07.021 ↗
10. Zadpoor AA, Malda J (2017) Additive manufacturing of biomaterials, tissues, and organs. Ann Biomed Eng 45:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-016-1719-y10.1007/s10439-016-1719-y ↗
11. Liu F, Mao Z, Zhang P et al (2018) Functionally graded porous scaffolds in multiple patterns: new design method, physical and mechanical properties. Mater Des 160:849–860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.09.05310.1016/j.matdes.2018.09.053 ↗
12. Ibrahim MZ, Sarhan AAD, Yusuf F, Hamdi M (2017) Biomedical materials and techniques to improve the tribological, mechanical and biomedical properties of orthopedic implants—a review article. J Alloys Compd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.04.23110.1016/j.jallcom.2017.04.231 ↗
13. Mahmoud D, Elbestawi M (2017) Lattice structures and functionally graded materials applications in additive manufacturing of orthopedic implants: a review. J Manuf Mater Process 1:13. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp102001310.3390/jmmp1020013 ↗
14. Harrysson OLA, Cansizoglu O, Marcellin-Little DJ et al (2008) Direct metal fabrication of titanium implants with tailored materials and mechanical properties using electron beam melting technology. Mater Sci Eng C 28:366–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2007.04.02210.1016/j.msec.2007.04.022 ↗
15. Murr LE, Gaytan SM, Martinez E et al (2012) Next generation orthopaedic implants by additive manufacturing using electron beam melting. Int J Biomater. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/24572710.1155/2012/245727 ↗
16. Yuan L, Ding S, Wen C (2019) Additive manufacturing technology for porous metal implant applications and triple minimal surface structures: a review. Bioact Mater 4:56–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2018.12.00310.1016/j.bioactmat.2018.12.003 ↗
17. Pantoja M, Velasco F, Abenojar J, Martinez MA (2019) Development of superhydrophobic coatings on AISI 304 austenitic stainless steel with different surface pretreatments. Thin Solid Films 671:22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2018.12.01610.1016/j.tsf.2018.12.016 ↗
18. Fathi MH, Doost Mohammadi A (2008) Preparation and characterization of sol–gel bioactive glass coating for improvement of biocompatibility of human body implant. Mater Sci Eng A 474:128–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2007.05.04110.1016/j.msea.2007.05.041 ↗
19. Fathi MH, Doostmohammadi A (2009) Bioactive glass nanopowder and bioglass coating for biocompatibility improvement of metallic implant. J Mater Process Technol 209:1385–1391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.03.05110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.03.051 ↗
20. Omar SA, Ballarre J, Ceré SM (2016) Protection and functionalization of AISI 316 L stainless steel for orthopedic implants: hybrid coating and sol gel glasses by spray to promote bioactivity. Electrochim Acta 203:309–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2016.01.05110.1016/j.electacta.2016.01.051 ↗
21. Al-Rashidy ZM, Farag MM, Ghany NAA et al (2017) Aqueous electrophoretic deposition and corrosion protection of borate glass coatings on 316 L stainless steel for hard tissue fixation. Surfaces Interfaces 7:125–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2017.03.01010.1016/j.surfin.2017.03.010 ↗
22. Deposition AL (2010) Atomic layer deposition を用いた磁性薄膜の作製スカーミオンの作製. 250. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4377-7867-0.00019-210.1016/B978-1-4377-7867-0.00019-2 ↗
23. George SM (2010) Atomic layer deposition: an overview. Chem Rev 110:111–131. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr900056b10.1021/cr900056b ↗
24. Putkonen M, Sajavaara T, Rahkila P et al (2009) Atomic layer deposition and characterization of biocompatible hydroxyapatite thin films. Thin Solid Films 517:5819–5824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2009.03.01310.1016/j.tsf.2009.03.013 ↗
25. Wang D, Bierwagen GP (2009) Sol–gel coatings on metals for corrosion protection. Prog Org Coat 64:327–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2008.08.01010.1016/j.porgcoat.2008.08.010 ↗
26. Houmard M, Nunes EHM, Vasconcelos DCL et al (2014) Correlation between sol–gel reactivity and wettability of silica films deposited on stainless steel. Appl Surf Sci 289:218–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.10.13710.1016/j.apsusc.2013.10.137 ↗
27. Pourhashem S, Afshar A (2014) Double layer bioglass-silica coatings on 316L stainless steel by sol–gel method. Ceram Int 40:993–1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.06.09610.1016/j.ceramint.2013.06.096 ↗
28. Luo J, Jia X, Gu R et al (2018) 316L stainless steel manufactured by selective laser melting and its biocompatibility with or without hydroxyapatite coating. Metals (Basel) 8:548. https://doi.org/10.3390/met807054810.3390/met8070548 ↗
29. Melo-Fonseca F, Lima R, Costa MM et al (2018) 45S5 BAG-Ti6Al4V structures: The influence of the design on some of the physical and chemical interactions that drive cellular response. Mater Des 160:95–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.08.05610.1016/j.matdes.2018.08.056 ↗
30. Yamamoto A, Kohyama Y, Kuroda D, Hanawa T (2004) Cytocompatibility evaluation of Ni-free stainless steel manufactured by nitrogen adsorption treatment. Mater Sci Eng C 24:737–743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2004.08.01710.1016/j.msec.2004.08.017 ↗
31. Zadpoor AA (2019) Additively manufactured porous metallic biomaterials. J Mater Chem B 7:4088–4117. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9tb00420c10.1039/c9tb00420c ↗
32. Gopi D, Ramya S, Rajeswari D, Kavitha L (2013) Corrosion protection performance of porous strontium hydroxyapatite coating on polypyrrole coated 316L stainless steel. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces 107:130–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.01.06510.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.01.065 ↗
33. He L, Wang Z, Sheath P et al (2015) Growth of nano-textured graphene coatings across highly porous stainless steel supports towards corrosion resistant coatings. Carbon. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2015.02.04210.1016/j.carbon.2015.02.042 ↗
34. Manakari V, Parande G, Gupta M (2016) Selective laser melting of magnesium and magnesium alloy powders: a review. Metals 7:210.3390/met7010002 ↗
35. Yan X, Yu C, Zhou X et al (2004) Highly ordered mesoporous bioactive glasses with superior in vitro bone-forming bioactivities. Angew Chemie Int Ed 43:5980–5984. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20046059810.1002/anie.200460598 ↗
36. Brinker CJ, Lu Y, Sellinger A, Fan H (2010) ChemInform abstract: evaporation-induced self-assembly: nanostructures made easy. ChemInform. https://doi.org/10.1002/chin.19992828810.1002/chin.199928288 ↗
37. Tabia Z, El Mabrouk K, Bricha M, Nouneh K (2019) Mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles doped with magnesium: drug delivery and acellular in vitro bioactivity. RSC Adv. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RA01133A10.1039/C9RA01133A ↗
38. Bricha M, Belmamouni Y, Essassi EM et al (2013) Hydrothermal synthesis and appraisal of Mg-doped hydroxyapatite nanopowders. J Biomater Tissue Eng 3:570–580. https://doi.org/10.1166/jbt.2013.112010.1166/jbt.2013.1120 ↗
39. Belmamouni Y, Bricha M, Ferreira J, El Mabrouk K (2015) Hydrothermal synthesis of Si-doped hydroxyapatite nanopowders: mechanical and bioactivity evaluation. Int J Appl Ceram Technol 12:329–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijac.1221010.1111/ijac.12210 ↗
40. Karapatis N, Egger G (1999) Optimization of powder layer density in selective laser sintering. Int Solid Free Fabr Symp. https://doi.org/10.26153/tsw/74610.26153/tsw/746 ↗
41. Zegzulka J, Gelnar D, Jezerska L et al (2018) Internal friction angle of metal powders. Metals (Basel) 8:255. https://doi.org/10.3390/met804025510.3390/met8040255 ↗
42. Li XN, Chen XM, Hu WL (2009) In Situ synthesis and characterization of β-tricalcium phosphate/Na doped 58S bioglass composite by sol–gel technique. Mater Sci Forum 610–613:1278–1283. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.610-613.127810.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.610-613.1278 ↗
43. Mozafari M, Moztarzadeh F, Tahriri M (2010) Investigation of the physico-chemical reactivity of a mesoporous bioactive SiO2-CaO-P2O5 glass in simulated body fluid. J Non Cryst Solids 356:1470–1478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2010.04.04010.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2010.04.040 ↗
44. Liu Y, Xue K, YAO S, (2019) Structure, degradation and hydroxyapatite conversion of B-doped 58S bioglass and glass-ceramics. J Ceram Soc Jpn 127:232–241. https://doi.org/10.2109/jcersj2.1820610.2109/jcersj2.18206 ↗
45. Chitra S, Bargavi P, Durgalakshmi D et al (2019) Role of sintering temperature dependent crystallization of bioactive glasses on erythrocyte and cytocompatibility. Process Appl Ceram 13:12–23. https://doi.org/10.2298/pac1901012c10.2298/pac1901012c ↗
46. Busca G, Lorenzelli V (1982) Materials chemistry infrared spectroscopic identification of species arising from reactive adsorption of carbon oxides on metal oxide surfaces. Mater Chem 7:89–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/0390-6035(82)90059-110.1016/0390-6035(82)90059-1 ↗
47. Filgueiras MRT, La Torre G, Hench LL (1993) Solution effects on the surface reactions of three bioactive glass compositions. J Biomed Mater Res 27:1485–1493. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.82027120410.1002/jbm.820271204 ↗
48. Bui XV, Dang TH (2019) Bioactive glass 58S prepared using an innovation sol–gel process. Process Appl Ceram 13:98–10310.2298/PAC1901098B ↗
49. Joughehdoust S, Manafi S (2012) Synthesis and in vitro investigation of sol–gel derived bioglass-58S nanopowders. Mater Sci Pol 30:45–52. https://doi.org/10.2478/s13536-012-0007-210.2478/s13536-012-0007-2 ↗
50. Gong W, Dong Y, Wang S et al (2017) A novel nano-sized bioactive glass stimulates osteogenesis via the MAPK pathway. RSC Adv 7:13760–13767. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra26713k10.1039/c6ra26713k ↗
51. Gu D, Shen Y (2009) Balling phenomena in direct laser sintering of stainless steel powder: metallurgical mechanisms and control methods. Mater Des 30:2903–2910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2009.01.01310.1016/j.matdes.2009.01.013 ↗
52. Mahmoud D, Elbestawi MA (2019) Selective laser melting of porosity graded lattice structures for bone implants. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 100:2915–2927. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2886-910.1007/s00170-018-2886-9 ↗
53. Gopi D, Murugan N, Ramya S, Kavitha L (2014) Electrodeposition of a porous strontium-substituted hydroxyapatite/zinc oxide duplex layer on AZ91 magnesium alloy for orthopedic applications. J Mater Chem B 2:5531–5540. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4tb00960f10.1039/c4tb00960f ↗
54. Arumugam MK, Hussein MA, Adesina AY (2019) In vitro corrosion and bioactivity performance of surface-treated Ti-20Nb-13Zr alloys for orthopedic applications. Coatings 9:34410.3390/coatings9050344 ↗
55. Sidane D, Khireddine H, Yala S et al (2015) Morphological and mechanical properties of hydroxyapatite bilayer coatings deposited on 316L SS by sol–gel method. Metall Mater Trans B Process Metall Mater Process Sci 46:2340–2347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-015-0397-810.1007/s11663-015-0397-8 ↗
56. Sidane D, Khireddine H, Bir F et al (2017) Hydroxyapatite-TiO2-SiO2-coated 316L stainless steel for biomedical application. Metall Mater Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci 48:3570–3582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-017-4108-810.1007/s11661-017-4108-8 ↗
57. Bricha M, Belmamouni Y, Essassi EM et al (2012) Surfactant-assisted hydrothermal synthesis of hydroxyapatite nanopowders. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 12:8042–8049. https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2012.666410.1166/jnn.2012.6664 ↗
58. Taghian Dehaghani M, Ahmadian M, Fathi M (2015) Synthesis, Characterization, and Bioactivity Evaluation of Amorphous and Crystallized 58S Bioglass Nanopowders. Int J Appl Ceram Technol 12:867–874. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijac.1229310.1111/ijac.12293 ↗
59. Kokubo T, Kushitani H, Sakka S et al (1990) Solutions able to reproduce in vivo surface-structure changes in bioactive glass-ceramic A-W3. J Biomed Mater Res 24:721–734. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.82024060710.1002/jbm.820240607 ↗
60. Xia W, Chang J (2008) Preparation, in vitro bioactivity and drug release property of well-ordered mesoporous 58S bioactive glass. J Non Cryst Solids 354:1338–1341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2006.10.08410.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2006.10.084 ↗