journal article·2019-04

Structural and optical characteristics, and bacterial decolonization studies on non-reactive RF sputtered Cu–ZnO@ graphene based nanoparticles thin films

Asim Jilani, Mohd Hafiz Dzarfan Othman, Mohammad Omaish Ansari, Mohammad Oves, Syed Zajif Hussain, Imran Ullah Khan, M. Sh. Abdel-wahab

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 54· Issue 8
Publisher page

Abstract

Graphene oxide (GO) belongs to carbon family with honeycomb structure having hydroxide, carbonyl, and carboxylic moieties at its basal plane. These functionalities are decreased in reduced graphene oxide (rGO), and this boosts the intrinsic properties of GO. Herein, in this work, the effect on physical and chemical properties of GO and rGO in combination with copper-doped zinc oxide (Cu–ZnO) thin films, prepared via DC/RF sputtering, was investigated for the very first time. The deposition of Cu–ZnO over rGO (Cu–ZnO@rGO) showed remarkably superior properties and presented an extension in d-spacing without preferred plane orientation of Cu–ZnO plane, and this was found to be due to its hydrophobic nature. The decrease in band gap of composite thin films was due to the surface electric charge conducted by GO or rGO. The enhanced dielectric constant is attributed due to increase in electron–hole pairs owing to the increase in sp2 hybridization. However, sp2 network was also found to be responsible to provide the conductivity path way which increases the dielectric loss in Cu–ZnO@rGO thin films as compared to that in Cu–ZnO@GO; this might be due to aggregation of Cu–ZnO nanoparticles over the rGO films in comparison with GO as evident from the morphological analysis by AFM. The change in surface chemistry was ascribed with the ratio of COOH, C=O, C–OH and C–C bonding in the Cu–ZnO@GO and Cu–ZnO@rGO thin films as unveiled in their XPS analysis. The developed thin films exhibited enhanced antimicrobial activity against E. coli and E. faecalis which might be due to the synergistic effects of Cu–ZnO with GO or rGO.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications · Graphene research and applications · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (59)

Show source-provided references
1. Jilani A, Othman MHD, Ansari MO et al (2018) A simple route to layer-by-layer assembled few layered graphene oxide nanosheets: optical, dielectric and antibacterial aspects. J Mol Liq 253:284–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2018.01.04210.1016/j.molliq.2018.01.042 ↗
2. Li F, Jiang X, Zhao J, Zhang S (2015) Graphene oxide: a promising nanomaterial for energy and environmental applications. Nano Energy 16:488–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.07.01410.1016/j.nanoen.2015.07.014 ↗
3. Jilani A, Hafiz Dzarfan Othman M, Omaish Ansari M et al (2018) Graphene and its derivatives: synthesis, modifications, and applications in wastewater treatment. Environ Chem Lett 16(4):1301–1323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-018-0755-210.1007/s10311-018-0755-2 ↗
4. Cao S, Liu T, Tsang Y, Chen C (2016) Role of hydroxylation modification on the structure and property of reduced graphene oxide/TiO2 hybrids. Appl Surf Sci 382:225–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.04.13810.1016/j.apsusc.2016.04.138 ↗
5. Yahia IS, Jilani A, Abdel-wahab MS et al (2016) The photocatalytic activity of graphene oxide/Ag3PO4 nano-composite: loading effect. Optik 127:10746–10757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2016.08.11710.1016/j.ijleo.2016.08.117 ↗
6. Jilani A, Othman MHD, Ansari MO et al (2018) Structural, optical, and photocatalytic investigation of nickel oxide@graphene oxide nanocomposite thin films by RF magnetron sputtering. J Mater Sci 53:15034–15050. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2692-710.1007/s10853-018-2692-7 ↗
7. Mei W, Lin M, Chen C, Yan Y, Lin L (2018) Low-temperature synthesis and sunlight-catalytic performance of flower-like hierarchical graphene oxide/ZnO macrosphere. J Nanopart Res 20:286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-018-4392-210.1007/s11051-018-4392-2 ↗
8. Perreault F, De Faria AF, Elimelech M (2015) Environmental applications of graphene-based nanomaterials. Chem Soc Rev 44:5861–589610.1039/C5CS00021A ↗
9. Huang X, Yin Z, Wu S et al (2011) Graphene-based materials: synthesis, characterization, properties, and applications. Small 7:1876–190210.1002/smll.201002009 ↗
10. Chen C, Yu W, Liu T, Cao S, Tsang Y (2017) Graphene oxide/WS2/Mg-doped ZnO nanocomposites for solar-light catalytic and anti-bacterial applications. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 160:43–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2016.10.02010.1016/j.solmat.2016.10.020 ↗
11. Hegab HM, ElMekawy A, Zou L, Mulcahy D, Saint CP, Ginic-Markovic M (2016) The controversial antibacterial activity of graphene-based materials. Carbon 105:362–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2016.04.04610.1016/j.carbon.2016.04.046 ↗
12. Krishnamoorthy K, Umasuthan N, Mohan R, Lee J, Kim S-J (2012) Antibacterial activity of graphene oxide nanosheets. Sci Adv Mater 4:1111–111710.1166/sam.2012.1402 ↗
13. Li R, Mansukhani ND, Guiney LM et al (2016) Identification and optimization of carbon radicals on hydrated graphene oxide for ubiquitous antibacterial coatings. ACS Nano 10:10966–10980. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.6b0569210.1021/acsnano.6b05692 ↗
14. Zeng Z, Yu D, He Z et al (2016) Graphene oxide quantum dots covalently functionalized PVDF membrane with significantly-enhanced bactericidal and antibiofouling performances. Sci Rep 6:20142. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep2014210.1038/srep20142 ↗
15. Vincent M, Duval RE, Hartemann P, Engels-Deutsch M (2018) Contact killing and antimicrobial properties of copper. J Appl Microbiol 124:1032–1046. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.1368110.1111/jam.13681 ↗
16. Jilani A, Abdel-Wahab MS, Hammad AH (2017) Advance deposition techniques for thin film and coating. In: Modern technologies for creating the thin-film systems and coatings InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/6332610.5772/63326 ↗
17. Szunerits S, Boukherroub R (2016) Antibacterial activity of graphene-based materials. J Mater Chem B 4:6892–6912. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TB01647B10.1039/C6TB01647B ↗
18. Shahriary L, Athawale AA (2014) Graphene oxide synthesized by using modified hummers approach. Int J Renew Energy Environ Eng 2:58–63
19. Jilani A, Othman M, Ansari MO et al (2017) Facile spectroscopic approach for optoelectronic properties of few-layered graphene oxide thin films and its role in photocatalysis as composite with RF sputtered ZnO. New J Chem10.1039/C7NJ03614K ↗
20. Liu H, Wang Y, Wu J, Zhang G, Yan Y (2015) Oxygen vacancy assisted multiferroic property of Cu doped ZnO films. Phys Chem Chem Phys 17:9098–9105. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CP00086F10.1039/C5CP00086F ↗
21. Bo W, Liu Z, Hong T et al (2015) Trilaminar graphene/tremella-like CuInS2/graphene oxide nanofilms and the enhanced activity for photoelectrochemical water splitting. J Nanopart Res 17:295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-015-3098-y10.1007/s11051-015-3098-y ↗
22. Saini P, Sharma R, Chadha N (2017) Determination of defect density, crystallite size and number of graphene layers in graphene analogues using X-ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopy. Indian J Pure Appl Phys 55:625–629
23. Cao N, Zhang Y (2015) Study of reduced graphene oxide preparation by hummers’ method and related characterization. J Nanomater 2015:168125. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/16812510.1155/2015/168125 ↗
24. Duan T, Lv Y, Xu H, Jin J, Wang Z (2018) Structural effects of residual groups of graphene oxide on poly (ε-caprolactone)/graphene oxide nanocomposite. Crystals 8:270. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst807027010.3390/cryst8070270 ↗
25. Paul R, Gayen R, Biswas S, Bhat SV, Bhunia R (2016) Enhanced UV detection by transparent graphene oxide/ZnO composite thin films. RSC Adv 6:61661–6167210.1039/C6RA05039E ↗
26. Thool GS, Singh AK, Singh RS, Gupta A, Susan MABH (2014) Facile synthesis of flat crystal ZnO thin films by solution growth method: a micro-structural investigation. J Saudi Chem Soc 18:712–721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jscs.2014.02.00510.1016/j.jscs.2014.02.005 ↗
27. Abdel-wahab MS, Jilani A, Yahia IS, Al-Ghamdi AA (2016) Enhanced the photocatalytic activity of Ni-doped ZnO thin films: morphological, optical and XPS analysis. Superlattices Microstruct 94:108–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spmi.2016.03.04310.1016/j.spmi.2016.03.043 ↗
28. Jilani A, Abdel-wahab MS, Zahran HY, Yahia IS, Al-Ghamdi AA (2016) Linear and nonlinear optical investigations of nano-scale Si-doped ZnO thin films: spectroscopic approach. Appl Phys A 122:862. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-016-0392-110.1007/s00339-016-0392-1 ↗
29. Zhang Q, Qin Z, Luo Q et al (2017) Microstructure and nanoindentation behavior of Cu composites reinforced with graphene nanoplatelets by electroless co-deposition technique. Sci Rep 7:1338. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01439-310.1038/s41598-017-01439-3 ↗
30. Jilani A, Abdel-wahab MS, Al-ghamdi AA, Dahlan AS, Yahia IS (2016) Nonlinear optical parameters of nanocrystalline AZO thin film measured at different substrate temperatures. Physica B 481:97–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2015.10.03810.1016/j.physb.2015.10.038 ↗
31. Whitby RL (2014) Chemical control of graphene architecture: tailoring shape and properties. ACS Nano 8:9733–975410.1021/nn504544h ↗
32. Yin PT, Shah S, Chhowalla M, Lee K-B (2015) Design, synthesis, and characterization of graphene–nanoparticle hybrid materials for bioapplications. Chem Rev 115:2483–253110.1021/cr500537t ↗
33. Azarang M, Shuhaimi A, Sookhakian M (2015) Crystalline quality assessment, photocurrent response and optical properties of reduced graphene oxide uniformly decorated zinc oxide nanoparticles based on the graphene oxide concentration. RSC Adv 5:53117–5312810.1039/C5RA06123G ↗
34. Liu X, Pan L, Zhao Q et al (2012) UV-assisted photocatalytic synthesis of ZnO—reduced graphene oxide composites with enhanced photocatalytic activity in reduction of Cr(VI). Chem Eng J 183:238–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2011.12.06810.1016/j.cej.2011.12.068 ↗
35. Lv T, Pan L, Liu X, Lu T, Zhu G, Sun Z (2011) Enhanced photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue by ZnO-reduced graphene oxide composite synthesized via microwave-assisted reaction. J Alloys Compd 509:10086–10091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.08.04510.1016/j.jallcom.2011.08.045 ↗
36. Jilani A, Abdel-Wahab MS, Othman MHD, Vk S, Alsharie A (2017) Sputtered CuO mono-phase thin films: structural, compositional and spectroscopic linear/nonlinear optical characteristics. Optik 144:207–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2017.06.07510.1016/j.ijleo.2017.06.075 ↗
37. Joshi K, Rawat M, Gautam SK, Singh RG, Ramola RC, Singh F (2016) Band gap widening and narrowing in Cu-doped ZnO thin films. J Alloys Compd 680:252–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.04.09310.1016/j.jallcom.2016.04.093 ↗
38. Lian K-Y, Ji Y-F, Li X-F, Jin M-X, Ding D-J, Luo Y (2013) Big bandgap in highly reduced graphene oxides. J Phys Chem C 117:6049–605410.1021/jp3118067 ↗
39. Guo L, Shao R-Q, Zhang Y-L et al (2012) Bandgap tailoring and synchronous microdevices patterning of graphene oxides. J Phys Chem C 116:3594–359910.1021/jp209843m ↗
40. Ravindra N, Ganapathy P, Choi J (2007) Energy gap–refractive index relations in semiconductors—an overview. Infrared Phys Technol 50:21–2910.1016/j.infrared.2006.04.001 ↗
41. Bhargava R, Khan S (2017) Effect of reduced graphene oxide (rGO) on structural, optical, and dielectric properties of Mg(OH)2/rGO nanocomposites. Adv Powder Technol 28:2812–2819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2017.08.00810.1016/j.apt.2017.08.008 ↗
42. Ahmed B, Ojha AK, Hirsch F, Fischer I, Patrice D, Materny A (2017) Tailoring of enhanced interfacial polarization in WO 3 nanorods grown over reduced graphene oxide synthesized by a one-step hydrothermal method. RSC Adv 7:13985–1399610.1039/C7RA00730B ↗
43. Gupta MK, Kumar B (2011) High T c ferroelectricity in V-doped ZnO nanorods. J Mater Chem 21:14559–1456210.1039/c1jm12107c ↗
44. Manjón F, Mari B, Serrano J, Romero A (2005) Silent Raman modes in zinc oxide and related nitrides. J Appl Phys 97:053516-1–053516-410.1063/1.1856222 ↗
45. Su T, Zhang H (2017) Electrical study of trapped charges in copper-doped zinc oxide films by scanning probe microscopy for nonvolatile memory applications. PLoS ONE 12:e017105010.1371/journal.pone.0171050 ↗
46. Kalbac M, Reina-Cecco A, Farhat H, Kong J, Kavan L, Dresselhaus MS (2010) The influence of strong electron and hole doping on the Raman intensity of chemical vapor-deposition graphene. ACS Nano 4:6055–606310.1021/nn1010914 ↗
47. King AA, Davies BR, Noorbehesht N et al (2016) A new Raman metric for the characterisation of graphene oxide and its derivatives. Sci Rep 6:19491. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep1949110.1038/srep19491 ↗
48. Jerng S-K, Seong Yu D, Hong Lee J, Kim C, Yoon S, Chun S-H (2011) Graphitic carbon growth on crystalline and amorphous oxide substrates using molecular beam epitaxy. Nanoscale Res Lett 6:565. https://doi.org/10.1186/1556-276x-6-56510.1186/1556-276X-6-565 ↗
49. John F, William F, Peter E, Kenneth D (1995) Handbook of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Physical Electronics. Inc., Minnesota
50. Jilani A, Iqbal J, Rafique S, Abdel-wahab MS, Jamil Y, Al-Ghamdi AA (2016) Morphological, optical and X-ray photoelectron chemical state shift investigations of ZnO thin films. Optik Int J Light Electron Optics 127:6358–636510.1016/j.ijleo.2016.04.127 ↗
51. Morimoto N, Kubo T, Nishina Y (2016) Tailoring the oxygen content of graphite and reduced graphene oxide for specific applications. Sci Rep 6:21715. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep2171510.1038/srep21715 ↗
52. Kumar S, Reddy NL, Kushwaha HS et al (2017) Efficient electron transfer across a ZnO-MoS2—reduced graphene oxide heterojunction for enhanced sunlight-driven photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Chemsuschem 10:3588–360310.1002/cssc.201701024 ↗
53. Grimm S, Schweiger M, Eigler S, Zaumseil J (2016) High-quality reduced graphene oxide by CVD-assisted annealing. J Phys Chem C 120:3036–304110.1021/acs.jpcc.5b11598 ↗
54. Chong Y, Ge C, Fang G et al (2017) Light-enhanced antibacterial activity of graphene oxide, mainly via accelerated electron transfer. Environ Sci Technol 51:10154–10161. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b0066310.1021/acs.est.7b00663 ↗
55. Wang X, Lu P, Li Y, Xiao H, Liu X (2016) Antibacterial activities and mechanisms of fluorinated graphene and guanidine-modified graphene. RSC Adv 6:8763–8772. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ra28030c10.1039/C5RA28030C ↗
56. Pei S, Cheng H-M (2012) The reduction of graphene oxide. Carbon 50:3210–322810.1016/j.carbon.2011.11.010 ↗
57. Azam A, Ahmed AS, Oves M, Khan MS, Memic A (2012) Size-dependent antimicrobial properties of CuO nanoparticles against Gram-positive and -negative bacterial strains. Int J Nanomed 7:3527. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S2902010.2147/IJN.S29020 ↗
58. Brayner R, Ferrari-Iliou R, Brivois N, Djediat S, Benedetti MF, Fiévet F (2006) Toxicological impact studies based on Escherichia coli bacteria in ultrafine ZnO nanoparticles colloidal medium. Nano Lett 6:866–870. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl052326h10.1021/nl052326h ↗
59. Zhang Y, Wang L, Xu X, Li F, Wu Q (2018) Combined systems of different antibiotics with nano-CuO against Escherichia coli and the mechanisms involved. Nanomedicine 13:339–351. https://doi.org/10.2217/nnm-2017-029010.2217/nnm-2017-0290 ↗