Bilinear approach to tensile properties of flax composites in finite element analyses
Source abstract
Abstract
Flax fibers show potential in bio-efficiency compared to conventional composite fibers with good mechanical properties. The tensile behavior of flax fibers shows a nonlinear stress–strain relation. Within this work, a bilinear elastic–plastic approach is described, which is based on the generalized Hill potential theory and easily applicable in ANSYS. The method was used to model the nonlinear stress–strain behavior under quasi-static tensile loading of flax fiber-reinforced laminates. Hashin failure mechanisms using the stress–strain data of the bilinear model are applied as well. The results were compared to experimental data, carried out using pre-impregnated flax fibers in three types of tensile test specimens. The layups of investigation were $$[0]_6$$ , $$[90]_6$$ and $$[\pm \, 45]_8$$ . The strain was evaluated using the non-contact, digital image correlation measurement ARAMIS. Good agreement with the test results was achieved, and the method of bilinear elastic–plastic modeling of flax fiber-reinforced structures was evaluated as simple but effective for quasi-static elongation under uniaxial tensile loading.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Mechanical Engineering and Vibrations Research · Mechanical Behavior of Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. Alkbir M, Sapuan S, Nuraini A, Ishak M (2016) Fibre properties and crashworthiness parameters of natural fibre-reinforced composite structure: a literature review. Compos Struct 148:59–7310.1016/j.compstruct.2016.01.098 ↗
2. Anandjiwala R, Blouw S (2007) Composites from bast fibres: prospects and potential in the changing market environment. J Nat Fibers 4(2):91–90110.1300/J395v04n02_07 ↗
3. Andersons J, Modniks J, Spārninš E (2015) Modeling the nonlinear deformation of flax-fiber-reinforced polymer matrix laminates in active loading. J Reinf Plast Compos 34:248–25610.1177/0731684414568043 ↗
4. ANSYS (2009) Theory reference for the mechanical APDL and mechanical applications, Release 12.0, SAS IP, Inc., Canonsburg, PA, USA , pp 71–94
5. Baley C, Bourmaud A (2014) Average tensile properties of French elementary flax fibers. Mater Lett 122(Supplement C):159–16110.1016/j.matlet.2014.02.030 ↗
6. Baley C, Perrot Y, Busnel F, Guezenoc H, Davies P (2006) Transverse tensile behaviour of unidirectional plies reinforced with flax fibres. Mater Lett 60:2984–298710.1016/j.matlet.2006.02.028 ↗
7. Charlet K, Jernot J, Breard J, Gomina M (2010) Scattering of morphological and mechanical properties of flax fibres. Ind Crops Prod 32:220–22410.1016/j.indcrop.2010.04.015 ↗
8. Charlet K, Jernot J, Gomina M, Bizet L, Bré Ard J (2010) Mechanical properties of flax fibers and of the derived unidirectional composites. J Compos Mater 44:2887–289610.1177/0021998310369579 ↗
9. Depuydt D, Hendrickx K, Biesmans W, Ivens J, van Vuure A (2017) Digital image correlation as a strain measurement technique for fibre tensile tests. Compos Part A 99:76–8310.1016/j.compositesa.2017.03.035 ↗
10. Dissanayake NP, Summerscales J, Grove SM, Singh MM (2009) Energy use in the production of flax fiber for the reinforcement of composites. J Nat Fibers 6(4):331–34610.1080/15440470903345784 ↗
11. Dittenber D, Gangarao H (2012) Critical review of recent publications on use of natural composites in infrastructure. Compos Part A 43:1419–142910.1016/j.compositesa.2011.11.019 ↗
12. El-Hajjar R, Qamhia I (2013) Modeling and characterization of the moisture-dependent bilinear behavior of regenerated cellulose composites. J Wood Sci 59:331–33610.1007/s10086-013-1330-x ↗
13. EN2561:1995 (1995) Aerospace series: carbon fibre reinforced plastics: unidirectional laminates. Tensile test parallel to the fibre direction; German Version EN 2561:1995. Deutsches Institut für Normung, Berlin
14. EN2597:1998 (1998) Aerospace series: carbon fibre reinforced plastics, unidirectional laminates. Tensile test perpendicular to the fibre direction; German version EN 2597:1998. Deutsches Institut für Normung, Berlin
15. EN6031:2015 (2016) Aerospace series: fibre reinforced plastics: test method—determination of in-plane shear properties ( $$\pm 45$$ ± 45 tensile test); German and English version EN 6031:2015
16. Gilat A, Goldberg RK, Roberts GD (2002) Experimental study of strain-rate-dependent behavior of carbon/epoxy composite. Compos Sci Technol 62:1469–147610.1016/S0266-3538(02)00100-8 ↗
17. Gning L, Liang S, Guillaumat L, Pui W (2011) Influence of process and test parameters on the mechanical properties of flax/epoxy composites using response surface methodology. J Mater Sci 46:6801–6811. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-011-5639-910.1007/s10853-011-5639-9 ↗
18. GOM mbH (2007) ARAMIS, Benutzerhandbuch-Software, v6, Gesellschaft für Optische Messtechnik mbH, Braunschweig, GER
19. Hashin Z (1980) Failure criteria for unidirectional fiber composites. J Appl Mech 47:329–33410.1115/1.3153664 ↗
20. Hendrickx K, Depuydt D, Van Vuure A, Ivens J (2016) The relationship between the tensile properties of natural fibers and their UD composites. 17th European conference on composite materials, Munich, Germany, 26–30 June 2016
21. Hill R (1998) The mathematical theory of plasticity. Oxford classic texts in the physical sciences. Clarendon Press, Clarendon
22. Howarth J, Mareddy SSR, Mativenga PT (2014) Energy intensity and environmental analysis of mechanical recycling of carbon fibre composite. J Clean Prod 81:46–5010.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.023 ↗
23. Hughes M, Carpenter J, Hill C (2007) Deformation and fracture behaviour of flax fibre reinforced thermosetting polymer matrix composites. J Mater Sci 42:2499–2511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-1027-210.1007/s10853-006-1027-2 ↗
24. Huntsman (2012) Technical data sheet, Araldite® LY 5150*/Aradur® 1571*/Accelerator 1573*/Hardener XB 3471*Prepreg System, Huntsman, Basel, SUI
25. Kersani M, Lomov S, Willem A, van Vuure A, Ne Bouabdallah A, Verpoest I (2015) Damage in flax/epoxy quasi-unidirectional woven laminates under quasi-static tension. J Compos Mater 49:403–41310.1177/0021998313519282 ↗
26. Liang S, Gning P, Guillaumat L (2015) Quasi-static behaviour and damage assessment of flax/epoxy composites. Mater Des 67:344–35310.1016/j.matdes.2014.11.048 ↗
27. Littell J, Ruggeri C, Goldberg R, Roberts G, Arnold W, Binienda W (2008) Measurement of epoxy resin tension, compression, and shear stress–strain curves over a wide range of strain rates using small test specimens. J Aerosp Eng 21(3):162–17310.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(2008)21:3(162) ↗
28. Madsen B (2007) Guidelines for mechanical design with biocomposites: properties, weight and cost. In: JEC Magazine, vol 37
29. Mahboob Z, Chemisky Y, Meraghni F, Bougherara H (2017) Mesoscale modelling of tensile response and damage evolution in natural fibre reinforced laminates. Compos Part B 119:168–18310.1016/j.compositesb.2017.03.018 ↗
30. Mahboob Z, El Sawi I, Zdero R, Fawaz Z, Bougherara H (2017) Tensile and compressive damaged response in flax fibre reinforced epoxy composites. Compos Part A 92:118–13310.1016/j.compositesa.2016.11.007 ↗
31. Panamoottil S, Das R, Jayaraman K (2016) Anisotropic continuum damage model for prediction of failure in flax/polypropylene fabric composites. Polym Compos 37(8):2588–259710.1002/pc.23453 ↗
32. Pitarresi G, Tumino D, Mancuso A (2015) Thermo-mechanical behaviour of flax-fibre reinforced epoxy laminates for industrial applications. Materials 8(11):7371–738810.3390/ma8115384 ↗
33. Raja T, Anand P, Karthik M, Sundaraj M (2017) Evaluation of mechanical properties of natural fibre reinforced composites: a review. IJMET 8(7):915–924
34. Rohit K, Dixit S (2016) A review: future aspect of natural fiber reinforced composite. Polym Renew Resour 7(2):43–60
35. Shah D (2016) Damage in biocomposites: stiffness evolution of aligned plant fibre composites during monotonic and cyclic fatigue loading. Compos Part A 83:160–16810.1016/j.compositesa.2015.09.008 ↗
36. Shah D, Schubel P, Clifford M, Licence P (2012) The tensile behavior of off-axis loaded plant fiber composites: an insight on the nonlinear stress–strain response. Polym Compos 33(9):1494–150410.1002/pc.22279 ↗
37. Shih C, Lee D (1978) Further developments in anisotropic plasticity. J Eng Mater Technol 100:294–30210.1115/1.3443493 ↗
38. Valliappan S, Boonlaulohr P, Lee I (1976) Nonlinear analysis for anisotropic materials. Int J Numer Methods Eng 10(3):597–60610.1002/nme.1620100309 ↗
39. Lineo (2015) Technical data sheet-FLAXPREG T-UD, Lineo, Saint Martin du Tilleul, FRA
40. Wang W, Zhang X, Chouw N, Li Z, Shi Y (2018) Strain rate effect on the dynamic tensile behaviour of flax fibre reinforced polymer. Compos Struct 200:135–14310.1016/j.compstruct.2018.05.109 ↗
41. Weeks CA, Sun CT (1998) Modeling non-linear rate-dependent behavior in fiber-reinforced composites. Compos Sci Technol 58:603–61110.1016/S0266-3538(97)00183-8 ↗
42. Zhong Y, Quan L, Tran N, Kureemun U, Lee H (2017) Prediction of the mechanical behavior of flax polypropylene composites based on multi-scale finite element analysis. J Mater Sci 52:4957–4967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-016-0733-710.1007/s10853-016-0733-7 ↗