Effects of thermal aging on fracture performance of polychloroprene
Source abstract
Abstract
Measurements of tensile and tearing resistance have been conducted as a function of aging time and aging temperature for a polychloroprene (CR). The steady increase in stiffness indicates that crosslinking is dominant during the aging of CR. In the early stage of aging, tensile strength and tearing energy increase thanks to an optimized balance between the strength enhancement from the crosslink network and the network capability in dissipating energy. Prolonged aging after a characteristic time results in a gradual decrease in strength and tearing energy and this change is more pronounced with higher aging temperatures. The superposition principle between aging time and aging temperature was used to determine the activation energy controlling the change of tearing energy in thermal aging. This value agrees with the activation energy Ea = 91 kJ/mol reported in current literature by monitoring the oxygen consumption rates during the aging of CR, suggesting that the change in tearing energy is controlled by chemical reactions much the same as the change in oxygen consumption dissolved in the material. It was also found that the variation in the strain energy density to break is also controlled by the same activation energy.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Polymer crystallization and properties · Smart Materials for Construction
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. E. T. MCDONEL and J. R. SHELTON, J. Chem. Eng. Data. 4 (1959) 360.10.1021/je60004a021 ↗
2. G. R. HAMED and J. ZHAO, Rubber Chem. Technol. 72 (1999) 721.10.5254/1.3538829 ↗
3. R. FAN, Y. ZHANG, C. HUANG, Y. ZHANG, Y. FAN and K. SUN, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 81 (2001) 710.10.1002/app.1488 ↗
4. A. S. DEURI and A. K. BHOWMICK, J. Mater. Sci. 22 (1987) 4299.10.1007/BF01132021 ↗
5. P. BUDRUGEAC, Die Angewandte Makromolekulare Chemie 247 (1997) 19.10.1002/apmc.1997.052470102 ↗
6. K. T. GILLEN, R. L. CLOUGH and J. WISE, ACS Adv. Chem. Ser. 249 (1996) 557.10.1021/ba-1996-0249.ch034 ↗
7. M. LE HUY and G. EVRARD, Die Angewandte Makromolekulare Chemie 261/262 (1998) 135.10.1002/(SICI)1522-9505(19981201)261-262:1<135::AID-APMC135>3.0.CO;2-W ↗
8. R. S. RIVLIN and A. G. THOMAS, J. Polym. Sci. 10 (1953) 291.10.1002/pol.1953.120100303 ↗
9. H. W. GREENSMITH, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 7 (1963) 993.10.1002/app.1963.070070316 ↗
10. H. W. GREENSMITH and A. G. THOMAS, J. Polym. Sci. 18 (1955) 189.10.1002/pol.1955.120188803 ↗
11. A. G. THOMAS, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 3 (1960), 168.10.1002/app.1960.070030805 ↗
12. K. TSUNODA, J. J. C. BUSFIELD, C. K. L. DAVIES and A. G. THOMAS, J. Mater. Sci. 35 (2000) 5187.10.1023/A:1004860522186 ↗
13. A. K. BHOWMICK, A. N. GENT and T. R. PULFORD, Rubb. Chem. Technol. 56 (1983) 226.10.5254/1.3538115 ↗
14. A. N. GENT, S.-M. LAI, C. NAH and CHI WANG, ibid. 67 (1995) 610.10.5254/1.3538696 ↗
15. A. N. GENT, P. B. LINDLEY and A. G. THOMAS, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 8 (1964) 455.10.1002/app.1964.070080129 ↗
16. G. J. LAKE and P. B. LINDLEY, ibid. 8 (1964) 707.10.1002/app.1964.070080212 ↗
17. D. G. YOUNG, Rubb. Chem. Technol. 58 (1985) 785.10.5254/1.3536093 ↗
18. G. J. LAKE and O. H. YEOH, Inter. J. Fract., 14(5) (1978) 509.10.1007/BF01390472 ↗
19. A. N. GENT and CHI WANG, J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Phys. Ed. 34 (1996) 2231.10.1002/(SICI)1099-0488(19960930)34:13<2231::AID-POLB12>3.0.CO;2-6 ↗
20. KILWON CHO and DAEHO LEE, ibid. 36 (1997) 1283.
21. E. SOUTHERN and A. G. THOMAS, Plast. Rubber Mater. Appl. 3 (1978) 133.
22. M. CELINA, J. WISE, D. K. OTTESEN, K. T. GILLEN and R. L. CLOUGH, Polym. Degrad. Stab. 60 (1998) 493.10.1016/S0141-3910(97)00113-4 ↗
23. J. WISE, K. T. GILLEN and R. L. CLOUGH, ibid. 49 (1995) 403.10.1016/0141-3910(95)00137-B ↗
24. K. AB. MALEK and A. STEVENSON, J. Nat. Rubb. Res. 7 (1992) 126.
25. M. CELINA, J. WISE, D. K. OTTENSE, K. T. GILLEN and R. L. CLOUGH, Polym. Degrad. Stab. 68 (2000) 171.10.1016/S0141-3910(99)00183-4 ↗
26. J. C. BAMENT and J. G. PILLOW, “Developments in Rubber Technology-2” (Applied Science Publishers Ltd., London, 1981) p. 147.
27. W. P. FLETCHER, “Rubber Technology and Manufacture” (Butterworth Scientific, London, 1982) p. 121.
28. A. N. GENT and J. SCHULTZ, J. Adhes. 3 (1972) 281.10.1080/00218467208072199 ↗
29. S. GLASSTONE, K. J. LAIDLER and H. EYRING, “The Theory of Rate Processes” (McGraw-Hill Book Co., Newyork, 1941).
30. T. W. DAKIN, Electrotechnology 66 (1960) 123.
31. L. MULLINS, Trans. Inst. Rubber Ind. 35 (1959) 213.
32. E. H. ANDREWS and Y. FUKAHORI, J. Mater. Sci. 12 (1977) 1307.10.1007/BF00540844 ↗
33. A. N. GENT and S.-M. LAI, J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Phys. Ed. 32 (1994) 1543.10.1002/polb.1994.090320826 ↗
34. A. G. THOMAS, J. Polym. Sci. 18 (1955) 177.10.1002/pol.1955.120188802 ↗
35. H. W. GREENSMITH, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 3 (1960) 183.10.1002/app.1960.070030807 ↗