Smoothening electrospinning and obtaining high-quality cellulose acetate nanofibers using a modified coaxial process
Source abstract
Abstract
The present research investigates a modified coaxial process for smoothening electrospinning of cellulose acetate (CA) and obtaining its nanofibers with high quality. With 11 w/v% CA in mixed solvent of acetone and N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMAc) (v:v, 3:1) as electrospinnable core fluid, different solvents (acetone, DMAc and their mixture) are taken as sheath fluids to conduct the modified process. SEM observations demonstrate that the modified process is effective in retarding the clogging of spinneret for a smooth electrospinning and in obtaining high quality CA nanofibers in terms of structural uniformity, diameters, and their distributions. The mechanism about the influence of sheath fluid on the process and the formation of nanofibers is discussed. The key for the modified coaxial process is the reasonable selection of sheath fluids and a sheath-to-core flow rate ratio matching the drawing process of core CA fluid during the electrospinning. The present paper provides a simple method to implement the modified coaxial process for smoothening the electrospinning and obtaining polymer nanofibers with high quality.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Nge TT, Sugiyama J (2007) J Biomed Mater Res A 81:124. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.3102010.1002/jbm.a.31020 ↗
2. Nishio Y (2006) Adv Polym Sci 205:97. doi: 10.1007/12_09510.1007/12_095 ↗
3. Ma Z, Kotaki M, Ramakrishna S (2005) J Membr Sci 265:115. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2005.04.04410.1016/j.memsci.2005.04.044 ↗
4. Son WK, Youk JH, Park WH (2006) Carbohydr Polym 65:430. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2006.01.03710.1016/j.carbpol.2006.01.037 ↗
5. Son WK, Youk JH, Lee TS, Park WH (2004) Macromol Rapid Commun 25:1632. doi: 10.1002/marc.20040032310.1002/marc.200400323 ↗
6. Han D, Gouma PI (2006) Nanomed Nanotechnol Biol Med 2:37. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2006.01.00210.1016/j.nano.2006.01.002 ↗
7. Taepaiboon P, Rungsardthong U, Supaphol P (2007) Eur J Pharm Biopharm 67:387. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2007.03.01810.1016/j.ejpb.2007.03.018 ↗
8. Wongsasulak S, Patapeejumruswong M, Weiss J, Supaphol P, Yoovidhya T (2010) J Food Eng 98:370. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2010.01.01410.1016/j.jfoodeng.2010.01.014 ↗
9. Tian L, Prabhakaran MP, Ding X, Kai D, Ramakrishna S (2012) J Mater Sci 47:3272. doi: 10.1007/s10853-011-6166-410.1007/s10853-011-6166-4 ↗
10. Yu DG, Shen XX, Branford-white C, White K, Bligh SWA, Zhu LM (2009) Nanotechnology 20:055104. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/20/5/05510410.1088/0957-4484/20/5/055104 ↗
11. Schoenmaker BD, Goethals A, Der Schueren LV, Rahier H, De Clerck K (2012) J Mater Sci 47:4118. doi: 10.1007/s10853-012-6266-910.1007/s10853-012-6266-9 ↗
12. Reneker DH, Chun I (1996) Nanotechnology 7:216. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/7/3/00910.1088/0957-4484/7/3/009 ↗
13. Agarwal P, Mishra PK, Srivastava P (2012) J Mater Sci 47:4262. doi: 10.1007/s10853-012-6276-710.1007/s10853-012-6276-7 ↗
14. Fridrikh SV, Yu JH, Brenner MP, Rutledge GC (2003) Phys Rev Lett 90:144502. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.14450210.1103/PhysRevLett.90.144502 ↗
15. Yang JM, Yu DG (2012) J Polym Res 19:9789. doi: 10.1007/s10965-011-9789-x10.1007/s10965-011-9789-x ↗
16. Tungprapa S, Puangparn T, Weerasombut M, Jangchud I, Fakum P, Semongkhol S, Meechaisue C, Supaphol P (2007) Cellulose 14:563. doi: 10.1007/s10570-007-9113-410.1007/s10570-007-9113-4 ↗
17. Liu H, Hsieh YL (2002) J Polym Sci: Polym Phys 40:2119. doi: 10.1002/polb.1026110.1002/polb.10261 ↗
18. Son WK, Youk JH, Lee TS, Park WH (2004) J Polym Sci: Polym Phys 42:5. doi: 10.1002/polb.1066810.1002/polb.10668 ↗
19. Wu XM, Branford-White C, Zhu LM, Chatterton NP, Yu DG (2010) Ester prodrug-loaded electrospun cellulose acetate fiber mats as transdermal drug delivery systems.J Mater Sci: Mater Med 21:2403-2411. doi: 10.1007/s10856-010-4100-y10.1007/s10856-010-4100-y ↗
20. Tungprapa S, Jangchud I, Supaphol P (2007) Polymer 48:5030. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2007.06.06110.1016/j.polymer.2007.06.061 ↗
21. Kanjanapongkul K, Wongsasulak S, Yoovidhya T (2010) Chem Eng Sci 65:5217. doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2010.06.01810.1016/j.ces.2010.06.018 ↗
22. Kanjanapongkul K, Wongsasulak S, Yoovidhya T (2010) J Appl Polym Sci 118:1821. doi: 10.1002/app.3249910.1002/app.32499 ↗
23. Zenis Y (2004) Science 304:1917. doi: 10.1126/science.109907410.1126/science.1099074 ↗
24. Díaz JE, Barrero A, Márquez M, Loscertales IG (2006) Adv Funct Mater 16:2110. doi: 10.1002/adfm.20060020410.1002/adfm.200600204 ↗
25. Yu JH, Fridrikh SV, Rutledge GC (2004) Adv Mater 16:1562. doi: 10.1002/adma.20030664410.1002/adma.200306644 ↗
26. Yu DG, Zhu LM, Branford-White C, Bligh SWA, White K (2011) Chem Commun 47:1216. doi: 10.1039/c0cc03521a10.1039/C0CC03521A ↗
27. Yu DG, Branford-White C, Chatterton NP, White K, Zhu LM, Shen XX, Nie W (2010) Macromolecules 43:10743. doi: 10.1021/ma102436310.1021/ma1024363 ↗
28. Yu DG, Williams GR, Gao LD, Bligh SWA, Yang JH, Wang X (2012) Colloid Surf A 396:161. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2011.12.06310.1016/j.colsurfa.2011.12.063 ↗
29. Moghe K, Gupta BS (2008) Polym Rev 48:353. doi: 10.1080/1558372080202225710.1080/15583720802022257 ↗
30. Yu DG, White K, Yang JH, Wang X, Qian W, Li Y (2012) Mater Lett 67:78. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2011.09.03510.1016/j.matlet.2011.09.035 ↗
31. Yeo LY, Friend JR (2006) J Exp Nanosci 2:177. doi: 10.1080/1745808060067001510.1080/17458080600670015 ↗
32. Gopal R, Kaue S, Feng CY, Chan C, Ramakrishna S, Tabe S, Matsuura T (2007) J Membr Sci 289:210. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2006.11.05610.1016/j.memsci.2006.11.056 ↗
33. Yu DG, Lu P, Branford-White C, Yang JH, Wang X (2011) Nanotechnology 22:435301. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/22/43/43530110.1088/0957-4484/22/43/435301 ↗