journal article·2009-02

Failure behavior of Cu–Ti–Zr-based bulk metallic glass alloys

Medhat Awad El-Hadek, Magdy Kassem

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 44· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

Microstructure fracture and mechanical properties of Cu-based bulk metallic glass alloys were investigated. Centrifugal casting into copper molds were used to manufacture basic Cu47Ti33Zr11Ni9, and modified Cu47Ti33Zr11Ni7Si1Sn1 alloys. Although the alloys show an amorphous structure, TEM images revealed the formation of nanoparticles. At room temperature compression tests reveal fracture strength of 2000 MPa, elastic modulus of 127 GPa, and 1.8% fracture strain for the unmodified basic alloy. Whereas the modified alloy exhibits a fracture strength of 2179 MPa, elastic modulus reaches 123 GPa, and 2.4% fracture strain. So, with the addition of 1 at.% Si and Sn, the fracture strength improves by 9% and the fracture strain improves by 25%, but the fracture behavior under compression conditions exhibits a conical shape similar to that produced by tensile testing of ductile alloys. A proposed fracture mechanism explaining the formation of the conical fracture surface was adopted. The formation of homogeneously distributed nano-size (2–5 nm) precipitates changes the mode of fracture of the metallic glass from single to multiple shear plane modes leading to the conical shape fracture surface morphology.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. Zhang T, Inoue A, Masumoto T (1991) Mater Trans JIM 32(11):100510.2320/matertrans1989.32.1005 ↗
2. Inoue A (1998) Acta Mater 48(1):27910.1016/S1359-6454(99)00300-6 ↗
3. Gilbert CG, Ritchie RO, Johnson WL (1997) Appl Phys Lett 71:47610.1063/1.119610 ↗
4. Conner D, Rosakis AJ, Johnson WL, Owen DM (1997) Scr Mater 37(9):137310.1016/S1359-6462(97)00250-9 ↗
5. Zhang QS, Zhang HF, Deng YF, Ding BZ, Hu ZQ (2003) Scr Mater 49(4):27310.1016/S1359-6462(03)00285-9 ↗
6. El-Hadek MA, Kassem M (2008) Int J Mech Mater Des 4(3):27910.1007/s10999-008-9068-0 ↗
7. Hays CC, Kim CP, Johnson WL (2000) Phys Rev Lett 84(13):290110.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2901 ↗
8. Glade SC, Löffler JF, Bossuyt S, Johnson W (2001) J Appl Phys 89:157310.1063/1.1332089 ↗
9. Bae DH, Lim HK, Kim SH, Kim DH, Kim WT (2002) Acta Mater 50(7):174910.1016/S1359-6454(02)00024-1 ↗
10. Schroers J (2007) Acta Mater 56(3):47110.1016/j.actamat.2007.10.008 ↗
11. Park ES, Lim HK, Kim WT, Kim DH (2002) J Non-Cryst Solids 298(1):1510.1016/S0022-3093(01)01047-X ↗
12. Choi-Yim H, Busch R, Johnson WL (1998) J Appl Phys 83(12):799310.1063/1.367981 ↗
13. Spaepen F, Taub A (1983) Amorphous metallic alloys. Butterworth, London
14. Nishiyama N, Inoue A (1997) Mater Trans JIM 38(5):46410.2320/matertrans1989.38.464 ↗
15. Volkert CA, Lilleodden ET (2006) Phil Mag 86(33–35):556710.1080/14786430600567739 ↗
16. El-Hadek MA, Kaytbay S (2008) Strain. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1305.2008.00552.x10.1111/j.1475-1305.2008.00552.x ↗
17. Bruck HA, Christman T, Rosakis AJ, Johnson W (1994) Scr Metall Mater 30(4):42910.1016/0956-716X(94)90598-3 ↗
18. Scudino S, Surreddi KB, Sager S, Sakaliyska M, Kim JS, Löser W, Eckert J (2008) J Mater Sci 43(13):4518. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-008-2647-510.1007/s10853-008-2647-5 ↗
19. Bhowmick R, Majumdar B, Misra DK, Ramamurty U, Chattopadhyay K (2007) J Mater Sci 42(22):9359. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-007-1856-710.1007/s10853-007-1856-7 ↗
20. Donovan PE (1988) Mater Sci Eng 98:48710.1016/0025-5416(88)90213-3 ↗
21. Lowhaphandu P, Montgomery SL, Lewandowski JJ (1999) Scr Mater 41(1):1910.1016/S1359-6462(99)00128-1 ↗
22. Wright WJ, Saha R, Nix WD (2001) Mater Trans JIM 42:64210.2320/matertrans.42.642 ↗
23. Wright WJ, Hufnagel TC, Nix WD (2003) J Appl Phys 93(3):143210.1063/1.1531212 ↗
24. Donovan PE (1989) Acta Mater 37:44510.1016/0001-6160(89)90228-9 ↗
25. Chen D, Takeuchi A, Inoue A (2007) J Mater Sci 42(20):8662. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-007-1830-410.1007/s10853-007-1830-4 ↗
26. Zhang ZF, Eckert J, Schultz L (2003) Acta Mater 51(4):116710.1016/S1359-6454(02)00521-9 ↗
27. Liu CT, Heatherly L, Easton DS, Carmichael CA, Schneibel JH, Chen CH (1998) Metall Mater Trans A 29(7):181110.1007/s11661-998-0004-6 ↗
28. Qiu K, Hao DZ, Ren YL, Zhang H (2007) J Mater Sci 42(9):3223. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0238-x10.1007/s10853-006-0238-x ↗
29. Bian Z, He G, Chen GL (2002) Scr Mater 46(6):40710.1016/S1359-6462(01)01233-7 ↗
30. Kim HS, Bush MB, Esstrin Y (2000) Acta Mater 48(2):49310.1016/S1359-6454(99)00353-5 ↗
31. Palmqvist S (1963) Jernkontoreets Ann 147:107
32. Chen H, He Y, Shiflet GJ, Poon SJ (1994) Nature 367:54110.1038/367541a0 ↗
33. He Y, Shiflet GJ, Poon SJ (1995) Acta Mater 43(1):8310.1016/0956-7151(95)90264-3 ↗
34. Gao MC, Hackenberg RE, Shiflet GJ (2003) Appl Phys Lett 83(13):257510.1063/1.1614420 ↗
35. Leamy HJ, Wang TT, Chen HS (1972) Metall Mater Trans B 3(3):69910.1007/BF02642754 ↗
36. Calin M, Eckert J, Schultz L (2003) Scr Mater 48(6):65310.1016/S1359-6462(02)00560-2 ↗
37. Bian Z, Chen GL, He G, Hui XD (2001) Mater Sci Eng A 316(1–2):13510.1016/S0921-5093(01)01260-6 ↗