journal article·2009-02

Phase-field simulation of directional solidification of a binary alloy under different boundary heat flux conditions

Jinjun Tang, Xiang Xue

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 44· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Complicated morphologies of directional solidification structures attract a lot of theoretical studies and commercial uses. As known, the boundary heat flux has an important significance to the microstructures of directional solidification. In this article, the interface evolution of directional solidification with different boundary heat fluxes is discussed. In this study, only one interface has heat flow, and Neumann boundary conditions are imposed at the other three interfaces. From the calculated results, it is found that different heat fluxes cause different microstructures in the directional solidification. When the heat flux equal to 18 W/cm2, the growth of lengthways side branches is accelerated and the growth of transverse side branches is restrained. At the same time, there is dendritic remelting in the calculating domain. When the heat flux equal to 36 W/cm2, the growth of the transverse side branches and the growth of the lengthways side branches compete with each other. When the heat flux equal to 90 or 180 W/cm2, the growth of transverse side branches absolutely dominates. The temperature field of dendritic growth is also analyzed and the relation between heat flux and temperature field is found.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Solidification and crystal growth phenomena · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. Wheeler AA, Boettinger WJ, McFadden GB (1992) Phys Rev A 45:742410.1103/PhysRevA.45.7424 ↗
2. Wheeler AA, Boettinger WJ, McFadden GB (1993) Phys Rev E 47:189310.1103/PhysRevE.47.1893 ↗
3. Boettinger WJ, Warren JA (1996) Metall Mater Trans A 27:65710.1007/BF02648953 ↗
4. Warren JA, Boettinger WJ (1995) Acta Metall Mater 43:68910.1016/0956-7151(94)00285-P ↗
5. Boettinger WJ, Warren JA (1999) J Cryst Growth 200:58310.1016/S0022-0248(98)01063-X ↗
6. Kim SG, Kim WT, Suzuki T (1999) Phys Rev E 60:718610.1103/PhysRevE.60.7186 ↗
7. Kim SG, Kim WT, Suzuki T (1998) Phys Rev E 58:331610.1103/PhysRevE.58.3316 ↗
8. Boettinger WJ, Warren JA, Beckermann C, Karma A (2002) Annu Rev Mater Sci 32:16310.1146/annurev.matsci.32.101901.155803 ↗
9. Kim SG, Kim WT (2001) Mater Sci Eng A Structure 304–306:28110.1016/S0921-5093(00)01453-2 ↗
10. Diepers H-J, Ma D, Steinbach I (2002) J Cryst Growth 237–239:14910.1016/S0022-0248(01)01932-7 ↗
11. Bi Z, Sekerka RF (2002) J Cryst Growth 237–239:13810.1016/S0022-0248(01)01893-0 ↗
12. Guo JJ, Li XZ, Su YQ, Wu SP, Li BS, Fu HZ (2004) Rare Met Mater Eng 33:195
13. Costa Filho RN, Kosterlitz JM, Granato E (2005) Physica A 354:33310.1016/j.physa.2005.03.010 ↗
14. Lan CW, Chang YC (2003) J Cryst Growth 250:52510.1016/S0022-0248(02)02393-X ↗
15. Lan CW, Shih CJ, Lee MH (2005) Acta Mater 53:228510.1016/j.actamat.2005.01.034 ↗
16. Lan CW, Lee MH, Chuang MH, Shih CJ (2006) J Cryst Growth 295:20210.1016/j.jcrysgro.2006.07.032 ↗
17. Singer HM, Singer-Loginova I, Bilgram JH, Amberg G (2006) J Cryst Growth 296:5810.1016/j.jcrysgro.2006.07.033 ↗
18. Plapp M (2007) J Cryst Growth 303:4910.1016/j.jcrysgro.2006.12.064 ↗
19. McCarthy JF (1997) Acta Mater 45:407710.1016/S1359-6454(97)00082-7 ↗