journal article·2015-05

Reduction of the repulsive interaction as origin of helium trapping inside a monovacancy in BCC metals

C. González, M. A. Cerdeira, S. L. Palacios, R. Iglesias

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 50· Issue 10
Publisher page

Abstract

We present the energetic, structural and electronic properties that explain the accumulation of He inside a single vacancy in both a BCC W and a BCC Nb crystals. Using density functional theory, we have obtained the most stable structures for an increasing number of He atoms within the monovacancy, with and without the presence of van der Waals (vdW) interactions. Our results show that the maximum number of He atoms that can be placed in the monovacancy is nine and suggest that the vdW interactions should be taken into account for higher He concentrations produced in bigger n-vacancies. The analysis of the density of states and the He–metal interaction reveals a reduction of the repulsion as the origin of He trapping inside the metallic vacancy. The formation energy grows almost linearly with the number of He atoms included, showing a strong dependence on the bulk modulus, while the binding energy presents a more complex behaviour. Finally, the deformations of the first (1NN), second (2NN) and third (3NN) nearest neighbour atomic distances to the vacancy change in different ways. The maximum deformation obtained (around 0.5 A) is found with precisely nine He atoms inside the vacancy, just before the bubble collapses.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Nuclear Materials and Properties · Microstructure and mechanical properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. Demkowicz MJ, Misra A, Caro AJ (2012) The role of interface structure in controlling high helium concentrations. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci 16:101–10810.1016/j.cossms.2011.10.003 ↗
2. Höchbauer T, Misra A, Hattar K, Hoagland RG (2005) Influence of interfaces on the storage of ion-implanted He in multilayered metallic composites. J Appl Phys 98:123516–12351710.1063/1.2149168 ↗
3. Misra A, Demkowicz MJ, Zhang X, Hoagland RG (2007) The radiation damage tolerance of ultra-high strength nanolayered composites. JOM 59:62–6510.1007/s11837-007-0120-6 ↗
4. Hattar K, Demkowicz MJ, Misra A, Robertson IM, Hoagland RG (2008) Arrest of He bubble growth in CuNb multilayer nanocomposites. Scripta Mater 58:541–54410.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.11.007 ↗
5. Gao Y, Yang T, Xue J, Yan S, Zhou S, Wanga Y, Kwok DTK, Chu PK, Zhang Y (2011) Radiation tolerance of Cu/W multilayered nanocomposites. J Nucl Mater 413:11–1510.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.03.030 ↗
6. Demkowicz MJ, Bellon P, Wirth BD (2010) Atomic-scale design of radiation-tolerant nanocomposites. MRS Bull 35:1–710.1557/mrs2010.704 ↗
7. Zinkle SJ, Ghoniem NM (2011) Prospects for accelerated development of high performance structural materials. J Nucl Mater 417:2–810.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.05.021 ↗
8. Brodrick J, Hepburn DJ, Ackland GJ (2014) Mechanism for radiation damage resistance in yttrium oxide dispersion strengthened steels. J Nucl Mater 445:291–29710.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.10.045 ↗
9. Was GS (2007) Fundamentals of radiation materials science. Springer, New York 191
10. González C, Fernández-Pello D, Cerdeira MA, Palacios SL, Iglesias R (2014) Helium bubble clustering in copper from first principles. Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng 22:035013–03501910.1088/0965-0393/22/3/035019 ↗
11. Becquart CS, Domain C (2007) Ab initio calculations about intrinsic point defects and He in W. Nucl Instrum Meth B 255:23–2610.1016/j.nimb.2006.11.006 ↗
12. Lhuillier PE, Belhabib T, Desgardin P, Courtois B, Sauvage T, Barthe MF, Thomann AL, Brault P, Tessier Y (2013) Helium retention and early stages of helium-vacancy complexes formation in low energy helium-implanted tungsten. J Nucl Mater 433:305–31310.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.09.001 ↗
13. Abd El Keriem MS, van der Werf DP, Pleiter F (1993) Helium-vacancy interaction in tungsten. Phys Rev B 47:14771–1477710.1103/PhysRevB.47.14771 ↗
14. Henriksson KOE, Nordlund K, Keinonen J (2006) Molecular dynamics simulations of helium cluster formation in tungsten. Nucl Instrum Meth B 244:377–39110.1016/j.nimb.2005.10.020 ↗
15. Li XC, Shu X, Liu YN, Yu Y, Gao F, Lu GH (2012) Analytical WHe and HHe interatomic potentials for a WHHe system. J Nucl Mater 426:31–3710.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.03.039 ↗
16. Zhou YL, Wang J, Hou Q, Deng AH (2014) Molecular dynamics simulations of the diffusion and coalescence of helium in tungsten. J Nucl Mater 446:49–5510.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.11.034 ↗
17. Becquart CS, Barthe MF, De Backer A (2011) Modelling radiation damage and He production in tungsten. Phys Scr T 145:01404810.1088/0031-8949/2011/T145/014048 ↗
18. Takayama A, Ito AM, Saito S, Ohno N, Nakamura H (2013) First-principles investigation on trapping of multiple helium atoms within a tungsten monovacancy. Jpn J Appl Phys 52:01AL03–01AC0510.7567/JJAP.52.01AL03 ↗
19. Seletskaia T, Osetsky Y, Stoller RE, Stocks GM (2008) First-principles theory of the energetics of He defects in bcc transition metals. Phys Rev B 78:134103–13411110.1103/PhysRevB.78.134103 ↗
20. Kashinath A, Demkowicz MJ (2011) A predictive interatomic potential for He in Cu and Nb. Model Simul Mater Sci 19:03500710.1088/0965-0393/19/3/035007 ↗
21. Dunn AY, McPhie MG, Capolungo L, Martínez E, Cherkaoui M (2013) A rate theory study of helium bubble formation and retention in CuNb nanocomposites. J Nucl Mater 435:141–15210.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.12.041 ↗
22. Björkman T, Gulans A, Krasheninnikov AV, Nieminen RM (2012) Are we van der Waals ready? J Phys 24:424218
23. Kresse G, Hafner J (1993) Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals. Phys Rev B 47:R558–R56110.1103/PhysRevB.47.558 ↗
24. Kresse G, Furthmuller JJ (1996) Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys Rev B 54:11169–1118610.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
25. Kresse G, Joubert D (1999) From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B 59:1758–177510.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
26. Blöchl PE (1994) Projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B 50:17953–1797910.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
27. Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M (1996) Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys Rev Lett 77:3865–386810.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
28. James AM, Lord MP (1992) Macmillan’s chemical and physical data. Macmillan, Basingstoke
29. Methfessel M, Paxton AT (1989) High-precision sampling for Brillouin-zone integration in metals. Phys Rev B 40:3616–362110.1103/PhysRevB.40.3616 ↗
30. Grimme S (2006) Semiempirical GGA-type density functional constructed with a long-range dispersion correction. J Comput Chem 27:1787–179910.1002/jcc.20495 ↗
31. Becquart CS, Domain C (2009) An object Kinetic Monte Carlo Simulation of the dynamics of helium and point defects in tungsten. J Nucl Mater 385:223–22710.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.11.027 ↗
32. Klaver TPC, Hepburn DJ, Ackland GJ (2012) Defect and solute properties in dilute Fe–Cr–Ni austenitic alloys from first principles. Phys Rev B 85:17411110.1103/PhysRevB.85.174111 ↗
33. Juslin N, Wirth BD (2013) Interatomic potentials for simulation of He bubble formation in W. J Nucl Mater 432:61–6610.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.07.023 ↗
34. Derlet PM, Nguyen-Manh D, Dudarev SL (2007) Multiscale modeling of crowdion and vacancy defects in body-centered-cubic transition metals. Phys Rev B 76:05410710.1103/PhysRevB.76.054107 ↗
35. González C, Iglesias R (2014) Migration mechanisms of helium in copper and tungsten. J Mater Sci 49:8127–8139. doi: 10.1007/s10853-014-8522-710.1007/s10853-014-8522-7 ↗
36. Söderlind P, Yang LH, Moriarty JA, Wills JM (2000) First-principles formation energies of monovacancies in bcc transition metals. Phys Rev B 61:2579–258610.1103/PhysRevB.61.2579 ↗
37. Birch F (1947) Finite elastic strain of cubic crystals. Phys Rev 71:809–82410.1103/PhysRev.71.809 ↗
38. Satta A, Willaime F, de Gironcoli S (1998) Vacancy self-diffusion parameters in tungsten: finite electron-temperature LDA calculations. Phys Rev B 57:11184–1119210.1103/PhysRevB.57.11184 ↗
39. Seletskaia T, Osetsky Y, Stoller RE, Stocks GM (2005) Magnetic interactions influence the properties of helium defects in iron. Phys Rev Lett 94:04640310.1103/PhysRevLett.94.046403 ↗
40. Becquart CS, Domain C, Sarkar U, DeBacker A, Hou M (2010) Microstructural evolution of irradiated tungsten: Ab initio parameterisation of an OKMC model. J Nucl Mater 403:758810.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.06.003 ↗
41. Valles G, González C, Martín-Bragado I, Iglesias R, Perlado JM, Rivera A (2015) The influence of high grain boundary density on helium retention in tungsten. J Nucl Mater 457:80–8710.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.10.038 ↗