Structure and evolution of multiphase composites for 3D printing
Source abstract
Abstract
Ethylene-vinyl acetate–glycidyl methacrylate random terpolymer (EVM–GMA, VA = 60 wt%, GMA = 2.9%) was used as a polymeric plasticizer replacing the traditional dioctyl phthalate (DOP) to prepare a polyvinyl chloride (PVC) masterbatch. Polylactic acid (PLA) was applied to blend with the PVC masterbatch in melt to examine the epoxy ring-opening reactions between epoxy groups in EVM–GMA and end carboxyl groups in PLA in order to construct a special phase structure in PVC/PLA improving the mechanical properties and 3D printing performance. The formation and evolution of phase structures were revealed by aids of the unique rheological responses of multi-component composite system. The results showed that with the increase in EVM–GMA content, the phase morphology of PVC/PLA was refined from co-continuous phase structure to denser one and then evolved to sea-island structure. It was also found that the addition of EVM–GMA inhibited the crystallization of PLA and the cold crystallization as well. When PVC/EVM–GMA/PLA was incorporated in weight ratio of 45/5/50, the denser co-continuous phase structure with smaller domain imparted the composite a highest zero shear viscosity and viscous flow activation energy. This unique structure existed stably when the shear rate was less than 230 s−1 or below 180 °C. Consequently, it endowed composite the highest impact strengths and smoothest appearance of 3D printed specimens. Therefore, moderate EVM–GMA is not only a reliable alternative plasticizer for PVC, but also an ideal modifier for the compatibility of PVC/PLA blends which presented an excellent performance in 3D printing.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization · Polymer crystallization and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Araújo EM, Hage E, Carvalho AJF (2004) Thermal properties of nylon6/ABS polymer blends: compatibilizer effect. J Mater Sci 39(4):1173–1178. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSC.0000013872.86575.3610.1023/B:JMSC.0000013872.86575.36 ↗
2. Sarasua JR, Arraiza AL, Balerdi P, Maiza I (2005) Crystallization and thermal behaviour of optically pure polylactides and their blends. J Mater Sci 40(8):1855–1862. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-005-1204-810.1007/s10853-005-1204-8 ↗
3. Li TY, Wang N, Fang QH (2010) Incorporation of modified soy protein isolate as filier in BR/SBR blends. J Mater Sci 45(7):1904–1911. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-009-4176-210.1007/s10853-009-4176-2 ↗
4. Bama GK, Devi PI, Ramachandran K (2009) Structural and thermal properties of PVDF/PVA blends. J Mater Sci 44(5):1302–1307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-009-3271-810.1007/s10853-009-3271-8 ↗
5. Haque MU, Pracella M (2010) Reactive compatibilization of composites of ethylene–vinyl acetate copolymers with cellulose fibres. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 41(10):1545–155010.1016/j.compositesa.2010.07.001 ↗
6. Lyu Y, Pang JG, Gao ZJ, Zhang QL, Shi XY (2019) Characterization of the compatibility of PVC/PLA blends by aid of rheological responses. Polymer 176:20–2910.1016/j.polymer.2019.05.016 ↗
7. Li XL, Xiao Y, Wang B, Xi HL, Ting X (2011) MMT and short time soaking in hexane to suppress DOP migrating from flexible PVC. Adv Mater Res 328–330:410.1364/FILAS.2011.FThB4 ↗
8. Jian YH, Liu DP, Ding YL, Li XH, Wang CL (2005) Release of dioctyl phthalate (DOP) from polyvinyl chloride (PVC) in apple packaging. Prog Nat Sci 15(1):145–14810.1080/10020070512330022 ↗
9. Papaspyrides CD, Tingas SG (2015) Effect of thermal annealing on plasticizer migration in poly(vinyl chloride)/dioctyl phthalate system. J Appl Polym Sci 79(10):1780–178610.1002/1097-4628(20010307)79:10<1780::AID-APP60>3.0.CO;2-A ↗
10. Stringer R, Labunska I, Santillo D, Paul J, John S, Angela S (2000) Concentrations of phthalate esters and identification of other additives in PVC children’s toys. Environ Sci Pollut Res 7(1):27–3610.1065/espr199910.007 ↗
11. Tarvainen M, Sutinen R, Somppi M, Petteri P, Antti P (2001) Predicting plasticization efficiency from three-dimensional molecular structure of a polymer plasticizer. Pharm Res 18(12):176010.1023/A:1013386900232 ↗
12. Lizymol PP, Thomas S, Jayabalan M (1997) Effect of dehydrochlorination of PVC on miscibility and phase separation of binary and ternary blends of poly(vinyl chloride), poly(ethylene-co-vinyl acetate) and poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile). Polym Int 44(1):23–2910.1002/(SICI)1097-0126(199709)44:1<23::AID-PI796>3.0.CO;2-P ↗
13. Lizymol PP, Thomas S (2010) Miscibility studies of polymer blends by viscometry methods. J Appl Polym Sci 51(4):635–64110.1002/app.1994.070510407 ↗
14. Lizymol PP, Thomas S (1993) Thermal behaviour of polymer blends: a comparison of the thermal properties of miscible and immiscible systems. Polym Degrad Stab 41(1):59–6410.1016/0141-3910(93)90061-M ↗
15. Nomai J, Jarukumjorn K (2014) Effect of maleic anhydride grafted poly(lactic acid) on properties of sawdust/poly(lactic acid) composites toughened with poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate). Adv Mater Res 970:74–7810.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.970.74 ↗
16. Zhang YC, Zhu ZF, Wu HY, Qiu YP (2010) Optimization fabrication of plasma treated nano-titanium dioxide particles/PP/PLA composites filaments using melt spinning. Mater Sci Forum 658:467–47010.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.658.467 ↗
17. Haque MU, Puglia D, Fortunati E, Pracella M (2017) Effect of reactive functionalization on properties and degradability of poly(lactic acid)/poly(vinyl acetate) nanocomposites with cellulose nanocrystals. React Funct Polym 110:1–910.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2016.11.003 ↗
18. Chen XL, Yu J, Guo SY, Lu SJ, Luo Z, He M (2009) Surface modification of magnesium hydroxide and its application in flame retardant polypropylene composites. J Mater Sci 44(5):1324–1332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-009-3273-610.1007/s10853-009-3273-6 ↗
19. Huang ZY, Lu SR, Yang ZY (2011) Studies on the properties of epoxy resins modified with novel liquid crystalline polyurethane. Adv Mater Res 150–151(9):727–731
20. Kumar M, Mohanty S, Nayak SK, Parvaiz MR (2010) Effect of glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) on the thermal, mechanical and morphological property of biodegradable PLA/PBAT blend and its nanocomposites. Biores Technol 101(21):8406–841510.1016/j.biortech.2010.05.075 ↗
21. Bredikhina ZA, Novikova VG, Zakharychev DV, Bredikhin AA (2004) Solid state properties and effective for guaifenesin, 3-(2-methoxyphenoxy)-1, 2-propanediol. Powder Diffr 19(2):127–13210.1154/1.1725274 ↗
22. Hardis R, Jessop JLP, Peters FE, Kessler MR (2013) Cure kinetics characterization and monitoring of an epoxy resin using DSC, Raman spectroscopy, and DEA. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 49(49):100–10810.1016/j.compositesa.2013.01.021 ↗
23. Vo Hong N, Trujillo E, Puttemans F, Jansens KJA, Goderis B, Puyvelde PV, Verpoest I, Vuure AWV (2016) Developing rigid gliadin based biocomposites with high mechanical performance. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 85:76–8310.1016/j.compositesa.2016.03.003 ↗
24. Zheng J, Dang H, Feng XY, Chien PH, Hu YY (2017) Li-ion transport in a representative ceramic–polymer–plasticizer composite electrolyte: Li7La3Zr2O12–polyethylene oxide–tetraethylene glycol dimethyl ether. J Mater Chem A 5(35):1845710.1039/C7TA05832B ↗
25. Jojibabu P, Jagannatham M, Haridoss P, Ram GDJ, Deshpande AP, Bakshi SR (2016) Effect of different carbon nano-fillers on rheological properties and lap shear strength of epoxy adhesive joints. Compos A 82:53–6410.1016/j.compositesa.2015.12.003 ↗
26. Han CD (1973) Influence of the die entry angle on the entrance pressure drop, recoverable elastic energy, and onset of flow instability in polymer melt flow. J Appl Polym Sci 17(5):1403–141310.1002/app.1973.070170508 ↗
27. Crossley RJ, Schubel PJ, De Focatiis DSA (2013) Time-temperature equivalence in the tack and dynamic stiffness of polymer prepreg and its application to automated composites manufacturing. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 52(5):126–13310.1016/j.compositesa.2013.05.002 ↗
28. Cheng C, Zhang XL, Meng YB, Zhang ZH, Chen JD, Zhang QQ (2017) Multiresponsive and biocompatible self-healing hydrogel: its facile synthesis in water, characterization and properties. Soft Matter 13(16):3003–301210.1039/C7SM00350A ↗
29. Marciel A, Srivastava S, Tirrell MV (2018) Structure and rheology of polyelectrolyte complex coacervates. Soft Matter 14(13):2454–246410.1039/C7SM02041D ↗
30. Chen HZ, Cheng X, Li JJ, Zhang Y (2018) Dynamic rheological characteristics of polycarbosilance melt in linear viscoelastic region. Silicon 4:1–7
31. Gilbert L, Picard C, Savary G, Grisel M (2013) Rheological and textural characterization of cosmetic emulsions containing natural and synthetic polymers: relationships between both data. Colloid Surface A 421:150–16310.1016/j.colsurfa.2013.01.003 ↗
32. Rohindra DR, Lata RA, Coll RK (2012) A simple experiment to determine the activation energy of the viscous flow of polymer solutions using a glass capillary viscometer. Eur J Phys 33(5):1457–146410.1088/0143-0807/33/5/1457 ↗
33. Pattanayek SK, Ghosh AK (2018) Dynamic shear rheology of colloidal suspensions of surface-modified silica nanoparticles in PEG. J Nanopart Res 20(3):5310.1007/s11051-017-4121-2 ↗